Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU Caps & Beanies... just made a deal, any1 want one?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

keep in mind, the narrower the design, the smaller it will have to be on the cap to fit it on the front... this dosen't apply to the beanie.

I reckon we get a narrow design for the beanie and a thick blocky design for the cap.

Funky,

If the caps and beanies are going to be in any way linked to the club then you will need to get permission from Nissan Australia to use anything that is Nissan or Skyline etc. This was a condition of us being able to use the "Skyline" in Skylines Australia.

Hope this helps.

Dan.

Originally posted by WazR32GTSt

i would be interested in a beanie but i don't want something crappy

it would have to be skull type (no fold over) and black. Maybe just the block letters of "S K Y L I N E" across the front like in the pic attached

keep it simple, but yeah i rekon i'm in if there are people that agree with this idea

i rkn thats cool! lurv tha font of the word SKYLINE

I'm tryin to find a 3d model of a cap that don't strect the image out to ungodly amounts (like in my last render). There's a really good cap model, but it costs $$$ to buy. I'll post when I figure one out.

Dan, with askin Nissan Australia... I was told that this was only the case for SAU NSW as you guys are a registered club. I was also told that all merchandise had to be put past Nissan Australia by you guys for approval. Us ppl in VIC n WA etc don't have this yet, so I don't see why we'd have to put it past them. Not sure about the legalities about the whole thing. Do you have a Nissan Aust rep contact details I could use?

Originally posted by Majanal

Funky,

If the caps and beanies are going to be in any way linked to the club then you will need to get permission from Nissan Australia to use anything that is Nissan or Skyline etc. This was a condition of us being able to use the "Skyline" in Skylines Australia.

Hope this helps.

Dan.

That sucks, I understand the "nissan" part needing permission but "skyline", the pricks dont even sell the car here [as we all know].

lokkin forward 2 cap / beanie :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...