Jump to content
SAU Community

Legalities Of Replacing Hicas With Lock Bar…

BAMR33
 Share

Recommended Posts

BAMR33 Mentor

BAMR33

Posted
Posted

I’ve replaced my HICAS with a lock bar and it’s been in there a while now, couldn’t be happier with it, but unfortunately my old man found HICAS unit and was instantly worried :laugh: .

Are there any legal issues with doing what I have done? Will it wipe my insurance? More importantly does anyone know if insurance assessors would look for something like this so vehicle specific?

Now I’ve I called around to a couple places and no one can seem to tell me what I need. My Dad seems to think I need an engineers report, but this seems a little excessive for something that essentially just making it the same as every other car on the road without HICAS. Would a mod plate cover this sought thing or is it deeper than that?

Cheers,

Brett.

DJRIFT Veteran

DJRIFT

Posted
Posted

i would be thinking that yes there would be a legal issue with them. say for example you was in a car accident that killed someone than your car may be examined and it could be found that because you had a un-tested lock bar it may have caused the accident. then you would be in the shit. like any mods thoe.

the chances of this senareo ever happening would be very slim but if you was conserned then just get a engerneer cert ant it should be all good.

hope that help and its only my oppinion so it has not legal bearing or anything like that.

i had a simmilar issue when i made myself a set of adjustable castor rods. i was told if they snapped and i had a bad accident then i would be at falt. but that goes for any mods you do.

BAMR33 Mentor

BAMR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
i would be thinking that yes there would be a legal issue with them. say for example you was in a car accident that killed someone than your car may be examined and it could be found that because you had a un-tested lock bar it may have caused the accident. then you would be in the shit. like any mods thoe.

the chances of this senareo ever happening would be very slim but if you was conserned then just get a engerneer cert ant it should be all good.

hope that help and its only my oppinion so it has not legal bearing or anything like that.

i had a simmilar issue when i made myself a set of adjustable castor rods. i was told if they snapped and i had a bad accident then i would be at falt. but that goes for any mods you do.

Cheers, that's kind of confirmed my fears. An Engineers report costs lots I believe, so looks like I'll just have to put the standard equipment back in.

BHDave Grand Master

BHDave

Posted
Posted

Unless the lock bar you have installed is made of tin foil, you really have nothing to worry about. It's not going to break, it's not going to be the cause of an accident.

It's a certainty that the lock bar hasn't been tested to conform to ADR's, so unless it's engineered it's not legal. But seriously, who's going to spot it?

If you are really that concerned then reinstall the stock rack and make up a couple of 5mm washers to fit on the end to lock it up that way. You end up with a 3kg or so weight penalty, looks stock once the boots are reinstalled, no hicas.

Beer Baron Grand Master

Beer Baron

Posted
Posted

yes, it's definately illegal to remove a rear steering rack from a car that was fitted with it form factory. as for your insurance being voided by it that is a question for your insurance company.

BAMR33 Mentor

BAMR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Unless the lock bar you have installed is made of tin foil, you really have nothing to worry about. It's not going to break, it's not going to be the cause of an accident.

It's a certainty that the lock bar hasn't been tested to conform to ADR's, so unless it's engineered it's not legal. But seriously, who's going to spot it?

If you are really that concerned then reinstall the stock rack and make up a couple of 5mm washers to fit on the end to lock it up that way. You end up with a 3kg or so weight penalty, looks stock once the boots are reinstalled, no hicas.

Yeah true, but just cars are assholes. Even if my car is in an accident and I'm not at fault they'll probably still look for a way to screw me out of my money.

dangerous_daveo Grand Master

dangerous_daveo

Posted
Posted

Really, it shouldnt cost you more than $120 you being in QLD. When I had my rb25 box put in, the standard mount was moved backwards. I had that engineered and mod plated, cost $120. I cant see a lock bar being too much different to that for an engineer to look at and plate.

RBwhatever Veteran

RBwhatever

Posted
Posted
Yeah true, but just cars are assholes. Even if my car is in an accident and I'm not at fault they'll probably still look for a way to screw me out of my money.

I told just cars insurance about my lock bar, they just said "as long as you get it fitted professionally you'll be right." I just described it to them as a unit that removes the 4wheel steering and they understood. They didn't whack me any extra money for it either. As long as notify them of all the mods on your car, they'll insure you for them.

BAMR33 Mentor

BAMR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I told just cars insurance about my lock bar, they just said "as long as you get it fitted professionally you'll be right." I just described it to them as a unit that removes the 4wheel steering and they understood. They didn't whack me any extra money for it either. As long as notify them of all the mods on your car, they'll insure you for them.

Cheers, never thought they would. Think I might do as dangerous_daveo said too and get it engineered and mod plated to be safe.

Sydneykid Grand Master

Sydneykid

Posted
Posted

The fact is if you are not using genuine Nissan windscreen wiper rubbers then you car is "illegal". Non genuine brake pads, non genuine brake fluid even non genuine mud flaps........basically you can't use anything that isn't genuine Nissan. Think about it, you have "insert name here" brake pads, so you couldn't stop to avoid the accident, sorry no insurance. But they are "better" brake pads, so what, they are not genuine. Winscreeen wipers, accident in the rain, bad luck, no insurance........

Check you old man's car out and find every non genuine part on it and pick on him for a change.

:P cheers :nyaanyaa:

BAMR33 Mentor

BAMR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The fact is if you are not using genuine Nissan windscreen wiper rubbers then you car is "illegal". Non genuine brake pads, non genuine brake fluid even non genuine mud flaps........basically you can't use anything that isn't genuine Nissan. Think about it, you have "insert name here" brake pads, so you couldn't stop to avoid the accident, sorry no insurance. But they are "better" brake pads, so what, they are not genuine. Winscreeen wipers, accident in the rain, bad luck, no insurance........

Check you old man's car out and find every non genuine part on it and pick on him for a change.

:P cheers :nyaanyaa:

:laughing-smiley-014:

Good point SK I'll hassle him about his non-genuine heater tap he's about to put in his car. Yeah, so I ended up calling just cars and they accepted the lock bar, so it's staying in there. cbf getting a engineers report and mod plate now.

Beer Baron Grand Master

Beer Baron

Posted
Posted

well this is the thing. there is a difference between a mod being illegal, and being unsafe (or unroadworthy).

as long as:

1. your insurer has been informed about the modification

2. they were installed/peformed by a professional or at least installed/carried out correctly and safely

3. they do not reduce the safe operation of the car

then you should be fine.

MANWHORE Grand Master

MANWHORE

Posted
Posted

Sorry, but I don't agree with you on that one gary. Basically, there are Australian Standards (ADR). Your car has to comply with ADR.

Essentially, say for example,w hen you first bought your car, it would have had nissan brake pads. They would have been ADR compliant. When bendix make brake pads, they are ADR compliant, and therefore, they are legal.

Same as the window wipers, etc.

If you check the RTA's website, there is a fact sheet about suspension/chassis modifications.

But I do agree with you in regards the insurance and accident point :laugh:

The fact is if you are not using genuine Nissan windscreen wiper rubbers then you car is "illegal". Non genuine brake pads, non genuine brake fluid even non genuine mud flaps........basically you can't use anything that isn't genuine Nissan. Think about it, you have "insert name here" brake pads, so you couldn't stop to avoid the accident, sorry no insurance. But they are "better" brake pads, so what, they are not genuine. Winscreeen wipers, accident in the rain, bad luck, no insurance........

Check you old man's car out and find every non genuine part on it and pick on him for a change.

:P cheers :nyaanyaa:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...