Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got a stock RB to go in my 180 and also have a stock rb25 turbo. Can i just bolt it on and boost away. Or am i going to need to get a tune, custom ecu, remapped ecu???

Also, what sort of power gain am i going to get with a RB25 turbo and 3inch exhaust, and what is an RB20's stock power output at the wheels anyway??????....... thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/176854-rb25-turbo-on-stock-rb20/
Share on other sites

it wont muck up fuel economy, and you will notice an increase in power but you wont get the full benefit untill it is tuned, to give you an idea my car was making 135rwkw at 10psi with the rb25 turbo then tuned it and at the same boost i made 150rwkw and then 180 with 13psi, it is a good cheap upgrade for the rb20

thanks, guess i will be getting a tune pretty much straight away then, was considering up grading my ecu at the same time, most likly to a link systems one.

Is this a good idea for early mods?? is it going to give me much more power?? cheers

It is definitely a great mod. The rb20 should have came out with the rb25 turbo.

It gives a fair bit more power, fair bit more torque, without much extra lag. Not to mention they're newer and in better condition.

Just to give you a rough idea, the rb25 turbo supposedly flows about 25% more than the rb20 turbo (that's what sydneykid says)

Its deffinately worth the upgrade. As stated the gains r there on 10psi, use the actuator from ur stock turbo and the 25 turbo otherwise u'll run about 6psi. I have the older RB20DET ECCS in an HR31 and with pod, 3 inch exhaust and 33 turbo I was making 130rwkw also, with the SAFC tuned and a Bosch 040 pump to be safe it went up to 152rwkw. Save ur cash and get ur RB20 ecu remapped.

Liam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...