Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes, they are both called 'godzilla' ...not officially tho...that was the nickname givin to the gtr cause it was a monster from Japan...

as for the vspec...i think the suspension is diff, brakes...and prolly a few other things. pretty sure they are 1994 only...someone correct me if im wrong..

basically if u search this topic, ull find plenty of info, cause its been discussed heaps...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3239523
Share on other sites

here ya go...

difference with Vspec models...

"To celebrate the success of the GT-R in both Group N and Group A racing, Nissan introduces the Skyline GT-R V-Spec ("Victory Specification") car on February 3, 1993. The V-Spec added Brembo brakes and a retuned ATTESA-ETS system to the Nismo and N1 packages, as well as 17" BBS wheels with 235/45/17 tires. The V-Spec has a list price of ¥ 5.260 million.

Finally on February 14, 1994 the Skyline GT-R V-Spec II is released, the only change to the V-Spec being wider 245/45/17 tires. Total production of the V-Spec I and II is 1,453 and 1,303 units respectively. The N1 GT-R is now based on the V-Spec II.

Total production of the R32 Skyline GT-R was 43,394 units, with production starting on May 22, 1989."

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Skyline_GT-R

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3239550
Share on other sites

here ya go...

difference with Vspec models...

"To celebrate the success of the GT-R in both Group N and Group A racing, Nissan introduces the Skyline GT-R V-Spec ("Victory Specification") car on February 3, 1993. The V-Spec added Brembo brakes and a retuned ATTESA-ETS system to the Nismo and N1 packages, as well as 17" BBS wheels with 235/45/17 tires. The V-Spec has a list price of ¥ 5.260 million.

Finally on February 14, 1994 the Skyline GT-R V-Spec II is released, the only change to the V-Spec being wider 245/45/17 tires. Total production of the V-Spec I and II is 1,453 and 1,303 units respectively. The N1 GT-R is now based on the V-Spec II.

Total production of the R32 Skyline GT-R was 43,394 units, with production starting on May 22, 1989."

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Skyline_GT-R

thanx heaps for the reply :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3243324
Share on other sites

Well the Godzilla reference was, originally, made with regard to the Ford Sierra. Something to the effect that "Nissans Godzilla on wheels will slay the Ford Sierra". So technically it was only ever about the Group A cars....

Anyway here is the cover of the Wheels mag from way back in 1989...

post-5134-1185161072_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3244236
Share on other sites

WRONG

only the r32 gtr is a true GODZILLA

+1 except i thought only the early 89ish ones (bnr32's) were the true godzilla's and the newer ones (bcnr32?? i cant remember model numbers) were pretty much the same things, with a few improvements and not quite the original... but maybe i'm just being ants at a picnic

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3244453
Share on other sites

+1 except i thought only the early 89ish ones (bnr32's) were the true godzilla's and the newer ones (bcnr32?? i cant remember model numbers) were pretty much the same things, with a few improvements and not quite the original... but maybe i'm just being ants at a picnic

You can reasonably refer to any R32 GT-R as Godzilla. They were all BNR32's.

In much the same way you can refer to all later models as soft try hard wannabe's. :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3244608
Share on other sites

ohh really, i thought they chucked a letter in to signify the revised one ^^ the guy who picks up the mail other day was giving me crap because i got a 93 and not the 89 'godzilla' one, ima slap the fool

There is bugger all difference between an '89 R32 GT-R & an '94 R32 GT-R.

Couple of changes to the trim, one to the crank/oil pump interface & a few other tidbits.

Some people get confused because you can buy R33 GTS-T's built in '93 & '94, ie alongside the last of the R32 GT-R's.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3244645
Share on other sites

You can reasonably refer to any R32 GT-R as Godzilla. They were all BNR32's.

In much the same way you can refer to all later models as soft try hard wannabe's. :)

Well.... WRONG! According to the general automotive media you can refer to any Nissan GTR as Godzilla, including the upcoming 2008 GTR. :D

Nissan GTR: bring back Godzilla

A decision on whether Nissan's iconic supercar GT-R will be back in Australian showrooms will be made in October.

Other Top storiesTop selling vehicles for 2007

Mitsubishi 380 dropped for Evolution X

Ford: slowly targeting women

Lexus racing to the hot rod league

05 June 2007

Neil McDonald

The wait has been long, but enthusiasts should know by October if Nissan's GT-R supercar will return to Australia. Unveiled as the GT-R Proto concept car in 2001, the eagerly awaited supercar has been a slow-burner.

But it will be officially launched at the Tokyo Motor Show, which starts on October 26.

At the same time, Nissan Australia general manager of marketing Ross Booth hopes to announce if the supercar will return Down Under. If it gets the go-ahead, the supercar, nicknamed “Godzilla”, could be on sale here late next year.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3244677
Share on other sites

You know you are struggling to make your point when you need to refer to the general automotive media, don't you!

:P

so who did you think came up with refering to GTR as Godzilla in the first place? yes, the media!

where are all the 33 and 34 GTR owners? surely they won't accept the fact that theirs are not real Godzillas! :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3244803
Share on other sites

so who did you think came up with refering to GTR as Godzilla in the first place? yes, the media!

where are all the 33 and 34 GTR owners? surely they won't accept the fact that theirs are not real Godzillas! :P

yes they do as those two model gtr's werent even in production

look at the cover above ^^^

what car does it show ?

answer = R32 GTR

it does NOT show a 33 or 34

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177332-dumb-question/#findComment-3244862
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...