Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I installed a twin plate nismo clutch today (along with new spigot, thrust bearing, and pivot ball)

Problem is that when I engage the clutch pedal, the clutch is not fully disengaging/allowing me to select a gear.

Any answers on what could be causing this?

just used the standard replacement thrust bearing, could that be it?

Definately cant be that the cluch plate is in the wrong way as it only fits one way.

We also noted that the slave cylinder pin was a bit worn... related??

ok i'll reword the above,

Those who have a Nismo twin plate, did you reaplce the bearing only or both the carrier and the bearing? (just a bit confused as the picture above shows the carrier AND bearing)

Thanks :P

Edited by MintR33

nar the carier is the same. but you need to get a back nismo catalogue and see what thickness you need. it is probablyu needs a thinner one. once you get the corect small bearing just see if the clutch fork isnt locked up. it should have abit of play in it.

Ok the 1600 Bearing had an outside diameter of 65.45 with the RB25 72.00 (as best as I can remember) the thickness between them was on .5mm difference.

Would the Diameter be enough to change the pivot point on the pressure plate?

its height not diameter your refering to. height changes the pivot point.

look, just get the little bearing. put it on your sleeve, bolt up the box, and inspect the freeplay. if it has any.

(min of about 5mm-max-15mm) placing the clutch fork in the forward most half of the hole in the gearbox.

  • 14 years later...

Sorry to revive such an old thread, but can anyone confirm the proper carrier that is used for the Nismo plate in a push configuration? The manual makes no mention of using a reduced height bearing carrier, however I’ve heard more than once that a reduced height bearing carrier is needed, I believe one from a Pulsar or Bluebird, don’t recall. The only component that comes with the clutch is a throw out bearing, which is a standard unit. Thanks for the help 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...