Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Before doing that, I'd get a larger diamter return hose for the bov from some place like clark rubber.

plug it to the bov and the other end to the return outlet on the intake pipe.

see if thats the restriction.

if you still get it, try your atmo bov.

if the atmo bov resolved the flutter issue, then a single GTR bov vented back has found it's limit.

the only reason I say the return pipe is the issue I had with my S14... or any 200sx for that matter.

you'll find that if a pod is fitted and they've raised the boost even to a mere 10 psi, at full boost gearshift, you will get a flutter.

and it's because of the pissant return line which becomes a flat section as it goes across the motor.

the new hose will cost you like $2 for a meter length.

just get a cheap clear hose as a test.

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Seriously, when was the last time chicks came running out flashing their tits and vaginas trying to get into your car because they heard the sound of your BOV?

Only last week i cracked a "Paatoosh" in front of the local catholic girls high school, and had dozens of vagina's and breasts coming from all angles. Clambering up onto the bonnet, falling through the sunroof, getting stuck under the car, was lunicay.

Use a large quality after market unit and plumb back - done, poontang mobbing can be dangerous for your heart :rofl:

whats the biggest port size on a bov these days? I know some turbosmart one we have on our race car is too small and we still get reversion. Was thinking of two std rb25 bovs.

whats the biggest port size on a bov these days? I know some turbosmart one we have on our race car is too small and we still get reversion. Was thinking of two std rb25 bovs.

One word... Vortech

BV57

1300 CFM@10 PSIG

vortech_performance_bypass_super_mondo.jpg

img-23-0-xlarge.jpg

Edited by GeeTR
whats the biggest port size on a bov these days? I know some turbosmart one we have on our race car is too small and we still get reversion. Was thinking of two std rb25 bovs.

Get a GTR twin setup :rofl:

Good for over 500rwkw

I see you changed your user id but not your dumbarsed attitude.

cry me a river man, how bout some productive criticism instead of sooking cuz someone hurt ur feelings

Also, your comment on ATMO being as good as stock \ plumb back - is crap.

They aren't. You obviously have no mechanical knowledge, and don't know that you simply can't use a ATMO BOV with a AFM configured car without running into problems.

Its not a personal taste - Its an annoying mod that people put on to piss off cops, and make owning a "japanese import" harder for the people that don't like to attract attention.

so ur telling me there is no advantage wat so ever in having a atmo bov?

he didnt say dont be ignorant. so if he meant that?, why didnt he say that?.. instead of a example which made no sence..

and im sure this topic has more of a impact on your car then a neon. Your talking about taste, bov isent about taste, its about performance!, a neon is taste, or a color is taste, not a bov or tyres and performance parts.. lol.

but i think if any one reads through this thread, you will get a good idea of what is best.. each to there own, very true..

some people compare what track cars use?.... well, im pritty sure most are useing there cars for street, (i know there alot of track guys out there :rofl: .. so how about, go plumback for the streets?, and what ever you want for the track hey?..

bov are loud enough, why do why need atmo on the street?, and there are some great points about turbo life with a plumback, very easy to understand...

agree with you partly, BOVs aint a personal taste but the noise is, and unfortunately more ppl get it for the noise then the performance. and yes ur right, ppl who are driving there cars on the road should proberly just stick with a plumb back, because there is no need for a atmo bov. but i could say the same about exhausts. why bother fitting a larger exhaust if your only using it on the street. simple...........wank factor

i guess the point im trying to make here is dont diss other peoples personal tastes. some ppl do like loud exhausts, and bov sounds. and some like the performance they give (and dont say there isnt any gain in using a atmo bov cuz there is) its there car and their life. i find it absolutely shockn you guys are bad mouthing ppls tastes in cars. i could look at any of you for a second and say ur a total top bloke because of a,b or c

but i dont...because i repect your decision.

Well...i got my GTR BOV for about $70...Good value if you ask me...bolts straight in...just need a larger hose for the plumback thats all...

Hrrrm, good to know, cheers. I think im hocking my stockers soon, to make room for a oil cooler core in that brake duct area.. hrrm..

Dragsters run superchargers, no BOV.

WRC I think someone stated DON'T run BOV at all.

drag cars cars have a endless different motor setup not just superchargers :)

infact there is a motor with both supercharger and turbocharger from the factory.

and when u think about barja,truck racing,drift,drag,hillclimb,touring car ect.ect the motors and choice is endless

alot of XRX`s use vent

but i do like the stig. :P

agree with you partly, BOVs aint a personal taste but the noise is, and unfortunately more ppl get it for the noise then the performance. and yes ur right, ppl who are driving there cars on the road should proberly just stick with a plumb back, because there is no need for a atmo bov. but i could say the same about exhausts. why bother fitting a larger exhaust if your only using it on the street. simple...........wank factor

i guess the point im trying to make here is dont diss other peoples personal tastes. some ppl do like loud exhausts, and bov sounds. and some like the performance they give (and dont say there isnt any gain in using a atmo bov cuz there is) its there car and their life. i find it absolutely shockn you guys are bad mouthing ppls tastes in cars. i could look at any of you for a second and say ur a total top bloke because of a,b or c

but i dont...because i repect your decision.

agreed for sure.. taste is taste, and if we all had the same taste, it would be to weird!!. we would be looking for the same looking girls..haha.. thats what makes us us.. i agree with the exhaust, i guess thats taste, but, i see some people buy a car, eg, my room mate and the wrx, and pop on a cheaper exaust, just so they can have the sound, and the dam exaust is way to loud, not even close to legel, the so called jasma stamped version are meant to be that bit beta, i saved a bit more cash and bought a jasma stamped 5zigen exaust, and its been worth it, nice and quiet, but hey, at the same time, we can say taste, but theses two things people crave the taste, are some times being abused and getting others introuble, (because of sound)... taste i agree on for sure.. but when the taste is giving of to much attention, and like every damn friday or saturday night, it gets a bit much.. (when its abused). cops are changing to get us, we need to change as well...

Edited by seriesII

While on the topic of plumbacks and atmo BOVs. I want to convert my atmo to plumbacks by taking off the trumpets and putting hoses to the recirculation piping. Will this stuff up the AFMs making me stall all the time, or am I just better to take them off and seal up the holes with a metal plate? Am I better to just get GTR stock BOVs and replace what I have. I just got the GTR and it has blitz ones and i dont thing RTA will allow me to get the RWC so I can register it if they are Atmo BOVs. Is it purely a noise problem or also increases the emissions?

THANKS :)

cry me a river man, how bout some productive criticism instead of sooking cuz someone hurt ur feelings

What is the use on giving YOU constructive criticism? we've all worked out that was of no use long time ago.

so ur telling me there is no advantage wat so ever in having a atmo bov?

YES. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE TELLING YOU..

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE WORDS THAT ARE COMING OUT OF MY MOUTH (keyboard)?

do you want us to tell you slower?

What is the use on giving YOU constructive criticism? we've all worked out that was of no use long time ago.

YES. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE TELLING YOU..

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE WORDS THAT ARE COMING OUT OF MY MOUTH (keyboard)?

do you want us to tell you slower?

sorry mate but now ur talkn shit....they may seem useless to you but they defiantly serve their purpose....

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...