Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok so over the time ive had my car ive had it dynoed 3 times, the first time was at turbo tune, hadnt had the car long, only had a 3" catback exhaust, besides that bone stock, had a few missing issues, but by the time it was fixed i got 150rwkw. the next time was at boostworx, nothing really major to report there, and finally i went to get a remap which was done at turbo tune by the speed lab, at this time i had now got a very high flowing turbo back exhaust, FMIC, pod, Bosch 040 and most importantly i had upgraded to a RB25 turbo from the original rb20 turbo. i received a before and after print out, the before was actually running a base map so not a full comparison but gave me a good idea. from the mid 150rwkw's with just the base map in with the rb25 turbo, it went to 182rwkw which i was pretty happy with, but still didnt resolve the big issue i had with lag of the rb25 turbo, now a bit more lag was expected even though it would receive a 3" dump and decat along with the new turbo aswell as the tune, but the amount was still very annoying. so i thought id chuck all my dyno sheets together and compare them on one chart. the result was fairly rough but gave me an idea.

Green: First dyno, stock RB20 Turbo

Red: Third dyno, rb25 turbo, base map

Blue: Third dyno, rb25 turbo, full remap and tune

Left Power, Right torque

dynocomp2dl6.jpg

Left Power, Right pressure

dynocomp4ha1.jpg

now ever since the rb25 turbo has been installed there has been a rattle that comes from the wastegate that comes on when decelerating in gear and in general low revs. i sussed it out and found that when i pull up on it, it almost feels like it clicks into place and stops rattling, only problem is after the wastegate is opened and close again it goes back to the original position. now this leads me to think there is a leak and its not sealing properly at low revs, and this would explain a massive difference in lag.

whats everyones thoughts on this?

original dynos:

post-23281-1188400721_thumb.jpg

post-23281-1188400691_thumb.jpg

post-23281-1188400775_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182907-rb20-dyno-comparisons/
Share on other sites

when the car is cool, get a good strong set of pliers and grip the actuator rod and try to pull it towards the dump pipe. Is it firm to really hard to move? does it wobble at all or does it feel loose?

if it all feels OK

to bring the boost on sooner try using a turbotech boost controller as the ball and spring mechanism will not net the actuator open at all until the desired boost is reached. it is an easy way to eliminate wastegate creep.

your power figure is really good. but you are right there seems to be a fair bit of lag. you have given a lot of useful info unlike a lot of the "what is wrong with my car" threads.

Also check to see if all the clamps leading to the actuator are tight and there are no splits or pinholes in the hose.

boost control looks good from the graph what are you using to control it?

Have you still got your RB20 actuator? it will suply more preload and may also help spool the turbo earlier.

worst case scenerio, you could pull the dump pipe and check the flap is seating properly.

Hope this helps :(

when the car is cool, get a good strong set of pliers and grip the actuator rod and try to pull it towards the dump pipe. Is it firm to really hard to move? does it wobble at all or does it feel loose?

if it all feels OK

to bring the boost on sooner try using a turbotech boost controller as the ball and spring mechanism will not net the actuator open at all until the desired boost is reached. it is an easy way to eliminate wastegate creep.

your power figure is really good. but you are right there seems to be a fair bit of lag. you have given a lot of useful info unlike a lot of the "what is wrong with my car" threads.

Also check to see if all the clamps leading to the actuator are tight and there are no splits or pinholes in the hose.

boost control looks good from the graph what are you using to control it?

Have you still got your RB20 actuator? it will suply more preload and may also help spool the turbo earlier.

worst case scenerio, you could pull the dump pipe and check the flap is seating properly.

Hope this helps :D

yeh it doesnt feel loose any other way but up and down. im using the cheap turbotech controller seen in that massive thread, it does do a good job, the first dyno doesnt use it but the other 2 do use the controller.

last time i checked there werent any obvious problems apart for the C clip on the end of the rod which was gone and i replaced that.

yes im still using the rb20 actuator, im starting to think i should try and source out a rb25 one just to try and see if i have the same issue.

im thinking of taking off the dump and checking it, but the amount of issues i had with putting the dump on (snapped off a bolt in the housing and ended up making one of the threads useless, so i sealed the dump with a silicone as well as the gasket) im not so keen to take it off in a hurry. when i had the turbo off it seemed like it was in pretty decent condition so id be kinda surprised if it was a fault with the turbo.

i would try another actuator, i dont seem to have any more lag than what i did with the rb20 turbo on my car, however i have a friend who's is laggier both have rb20 actuators.

i doubt your dump would cause this, you would hear the exhaust leak and wouldn't make that amount of power.

i would try another actuator, i dont seem to have any more lag than what i did with the rb20 turbo on my car, however i have a friend who's is laggier both have rb20 actuators.

i doubt your dump would cause this, you would hear the exhaust leak and wouldn't make that amount of power.

alright cheers. yeh im not saying its my dump causing it, its just i cbf taking it off to check as its going to be a bitch to get back on and seal.

Sounds like you have the same problem as i did with my turbo, the waste gate as not sealing on the turbine housing letting exhaust gas bypass the exhaust turbing through the leaking waste gate.

I could hear the waste gate "flap" rattling on the turbing housing when cruising around, all i did to fix it (a bit dodge) was bend the waste gate accuator arm outwards so that it was applying more force to the waste gate making it seal.

Boost response went from 15psi at around 3800rpm to around 3200rpm, just make sure you dont bread anything if your going to bend the waste gate accuator arm and you dont go too far so it fouls on anything.

Edited by Ceffy_SA

As CEFFY SA said, its probly the wastegate flap not sealing tight. i also had this problem, just grab the actuator rod with pliers and use a big screwdriver to put a bend in the middle, this will pull the gate flap shut tighter and fix the problem. Takes like 1 minute to do and makes the car feel so much better to come on boost.

I elongated the bolt up hole (top hole only required) on my rb20 actuator. Big screwdriver to push the actuator towards the front of the engine bay (away from the turbine housing) to apply as much preload as you wish then tighten up the actuator bolts.

Takes little adjusting but with no boost controller I had mine running ~15-16psi for quite a few years using that method. :rofl:

Also didn't drop boost. :)

It worked so well that I sold my Blitz SBC-iD III EBC which I now regret doing with my current setup. :)

Don't bend, that is the most rediculous thing you casn do. do as Cubes suggests and elongate the holes. Then just move the pod away from the turbo. You should need to pull the rod arm the width of it's hole to get it over the wastegate arm. It should be firm and hard to pull out.

Loosen the bolts slightly; connect the actuator arm to the wastegate.

Shove a big arsed screw driver inbetween the comp cover and actuator. Lever the actuator away from the turbo (actuator to the front of the car) and nip up the bolts.

Then drive carefully and see what boost your running, pull over slightly adjust and see again. :cheers:

I ended up marking the actuator rod where it enters the actuator for easier rough adjustment.

From memory mine required ~5mm preload for ~1bar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...