Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a problem I hope some one can tell me what it is.

The vibration starts at around 2500rpm, but could be there before but no noticable enough, doesn't matter weather the clutch is in or out, moving or stationary, it did happen after doing lots and lots of doughnuts with a diablo in a tunnel, this is when my gearbox failed as well, don't know if it's connected or coincidence?

The vibration stays throughout the rev range and makes the car feel as if it doesn't want to accelerate rather than before it wanted to go.

It was bouncing of the rev limiter quite a lot, I know it's bad but the tempatation was too much. I've heard oil pumps don't like this, but could that cause such a vibration?

Cheers

Stewart

Edited by Japtastic-UK
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183440-engine-vibration/
Share on other sites

I had a bad vib around 1500- 3000rpm in my rb26 then not so bad but still noticeable through the rest of the rev range. Turned out it was the harmonic balancer bolt had come loose (or maybe the previous owner didn't tighten it enough). Also a definate lack of power in accordance. Anyway I spun the balancer and chewed the keyway on the crankshaft. Obviously harmonic balancers are there for a reason; they add weight where there isn't enough and take it away where there's too much. When they spin they kinda emphasise the bad and reinforce the good which doesn't work. Well it was kinda expensive...like new crank, balancer and bottom end freshen up expensive. Have also had the oil pump go as well. Doesn't vibrate just gives no oil pressure and starts to get a little sluggish. Check ur harmo bolt for starters i'd say.

That's definantly fine as I have just replaced the timing belt and tensioners, so it's all torqued up, the vibration was there before this btw, I changed that lot to see if the vibration would go away but it didn't. Thanks for the input anyway. Can harmonic balancers fail and cause this?

The standard balancer has rubber mounted v-groove pulleys which i've seen compress on 1 side presumably (correct if i'm wrong) from sitting for years at a time on an engine that has rarely been started, such as in japan pre-export. The belts are obviously still tensioned and are continually pulling in 1 direction on the balancer, the rubber goes hard over time, and you are stuck with an out of balance balancer. Don't know about that if urs failed after doing donuts. Have you done a compression test on ur engine? If 1 of ur cylinders has lower comp for some reason it could be vibrational. Could also explain the lack of power. Just a thought.

Compression is good across the board, defianantly firing on all 6, it still pulls like a train but not like before, I'm in the middle of changing my gearbox and I'm hoping that will fix it because it was very screwed. I'mm hoping that the gearbox can cause this even with the clutch depressed?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...