Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey PRANK,

you said u were installing the HKs type1, ..im gonna be doing that 2moro..

i heard that it removes the 180 speed limit... becuase u gotta hook the brown and blue wires into the ECU, which are speed and rpm..

so it loops the speedo thru the TT and removes the 180 limit..

any truth in this???

mc

:shake:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-36646
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

saiyan : thast what i asked..i believe it does..

firends of mine say they have gone over 180..and are using the type 1..

but they are running different that stock wheels..

and didnt push more than 190..

so i dunno

im a bit warey of trying it out (over 180) after i get my type1 fitted..

mc

:shake:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-37229
Share on other sites

I've made my appointment for BRANT installation this Saturday 3rd August 9AM. If anyone else is interested, there will be a $60 discount for a AA02A or a $100 discount for a nemesis alarm if you install one at the same time.

In North Sydney area. Msg me ASAP or email: [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-37384
Share on other sites

Nemesis 2 wont be available until late in the year - it will have full

onboard monitored GPS tracking and will cost approx $ 2600.Nemesis 1 is

available now and will be upgradeable to the tracking when it is

available. Nemesis 1 costs $ 990.

Nemesis 1 is $ 990 fully fitted. Only options are power window lifter

modules which are $ 95 fitted for 2 windows or $125 fitted for 4

windows.

At this stage we are still tossing up between three carriers for our

tracking but wld estimate that the tracking would cost around $1700 to

$1900 if we go fully monitored 24/7 or around $ 1200 if self monitored

via mobile phone.

As stated we have no firm date yet on Nemesis 2. Nemesis 1 is also

compatible with any other tracking system provided the Nemesis is fitted

first ( as tracking systems wld use Nemesis remote to operate their

system)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-38481
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest | hype^ |
Originally posted by brendanf

Nemesis 1 is $ 990 fully fitted. Only options are power window lifter

modules which are $ 95 fitted for 2 windows or $125 fitted for 4

windows.

WTF!!! i just got a quote for the window lifting with a AA02A today and they said itll be 160$ extra!!

wats up with that!!???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-46482
Share on other sites

I have had a AA02 fitted to my car (since removed) and the only thing I could complain about is not so much the "range", but the time taken to arm and disarm etc.

I now have a quik trak installed and very shortly this too will be removed and replaced with an even better system in about a month.

I am not saying either of these systems are bad, or failed in anyway - but I take vehicle security quite seriously and get to test out and try new systems when they are released and updated etc,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-47847
Share on other sites

I will be selling the Quik Trak when the other system gets installed.

I have alreay been offered $750 for it, so I'll see what happens..

Can't say too much - but it will be Sattelite based, and not Tower based like QT. (nOt that that is a problem for me in the sydney Metro area, I just want to get a sattelite system and this new model will be available soon ( final testing phase)

If this new system is as good as they say - I will try and arrange for some special skylinesaustralia and performance forums members prices etc. - Stay Turned..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1840-brant/page/3/#findComment-49533
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...