Jump to content
SAU Community

Dyno Result It, What Do U Think?

kay33

By kay33,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

SHY_33 Apprentice

SHY_33

Posted
Posted

Thats a very hi dyno report iv only got done acl forgies hks turbo from turbo back front mount z32 airflow and a apexi power fc and i only got 170rkw and running a happy 15psi plus my motor is only 2000ks old,

iv been told depending on what mode the dyno is set on u will get a diffrent kw reading my mate went to rajab and he had 250 rwk and then went to jpc and only got 225 + his car went quicker afterbeing tuned by jpc then rajab

i cant say anything cause mines on 15psi but im trying to blow it to fit a big1, they only blow the exhaust wheel off anyway and u can pick a standar 1 up for stuff all. my goal is to atleast hit 280kw and run a 12

but looking at all the things that have been done to all the cars on here it cost mega dollars to get there

pumbaa Explorer

pumbaa

Posted
Posted
i got 198rwkw and a friend got 200rwkw on racinglines dyno with standard turbo so it sounds a little high but autos's seriously dont sap as much power as what everyone thinks.

all turbos are different i had a standard r32 turb boosted to 17psi for ages and the things still alive!!It was in an r31 sold the car now but its still running fine and the new owner is not afraid to boost it .

tek_01 Proficient

tek_01

Posted
Posted

haha, how can that be?? 200odd HP and you runs 11 sec?? am i missing something?

ive got similar mods and power as the orignal post and also running 0.9bar and have been for a about 6 months and its been ok so far

no doubt turbo will go one day which gives me more excuse to get a new one =)

MZTRBO Experienced

MZTRBO

Posted
Posted
haha, how can that be?? 200odd HP and you runs 11 sec?? am i missing something?

ive got similar mods and power as the orignal post and also running 0.9bar and have been for a about 6 months and its been ok so far

no doubt turbo will go one day which gives me more excuse to get a new one =)

Yep, its a 850kg car...120Y

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...