Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

My car is pretty stock, came from Japan about 4 weeks ago.

Only engine modifications it has is a back exhaust and pod filter.

Basically there is no rev limiter? I have rev'd it to 8,000rpm on occasions and backed off as it didn't stop at a limiter?

Red line starts at 7,500 if I am not wrong, and it should be limited at 7,800 if I am not mistaken?

I have spoken to a few other RB20 owners and they have also had the same issue. I guess the question I am asking is, did R32 RB20DET come out with a rev limiter?

I haven't checked the ECU yet, but I doubt it would have been altered as the car is very stock.. But what would I be looking for that would show the rev limiter has been removed?

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Abu

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184518-rb20det-rev-limiter/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my mates rb20 revs past 8000 rpm too! he is scared to over rev it! he thinks there was no limiter so 8200 sounds possible

Yeah its very weird!

I usually rev my cars hard, but I actually really like this R32 and I'm looking after it haha

I don't want to be reving it past past recommended redline!

Has anyone experienced or seen a RB20 with a rev limiter, on standard ECU?

Edited by abu

It may be "apparently" higher because the spring on the tacho needle is getting a bit "soft", and letting the needle spin further than it should.

I've noticed the tacho readout on my Wolf handset is less than the tacho in the instrument cluster.

yep mine was 8,200 standard auto ecu

bashed it every monday night for 3 months making 230rwkw

no probs

pretty sure its still going now

8,200 far out. I would never rev it that hard.. well..

It struggles to rev kinda past 5,500 - 6,000 rpm due to being on standard turbo, stock intcooler and only having a cat back exhaust.

Once I get the turbo back exhaust on, cooler and bigger turbo on, with the WOLF tuned then I will rev it to that ;)

It may be "apparently" higher because the spring on the tacho needle is getting a bit "soft", and letting the needle spin further than it should.

I've noticed the tacho readout on my Wolf handset is less than the tacho in the instrument cluster.

Oh thats interesting..

No idea man, wont be able to check that until I get my WOLF in and tuned I guess, or I guess until it gets onto a dyno.

Edited by abu

7,800 is the factory,

mine had an auto box now a manual box, hasnt ever changed....i have it chiped and its still the same only the speed limited was put a fair bit higher.

it shouldnt have a problem reving that high even on stock turbo....just that you wont get stuff all power up there, so its kinda pointless to rev it that high. if you have an aftermarket turbo then go for it.

I can confirm this also.

the standard tacho is inaccurate. there is indeed a 7500 rpm limit with a hard cut at 7800. the tacho is almost 10% out. so 7500 + 10% = 8250 ;)

Is that right. Whats the reason for it being out, like where they released out from factory?

I haven't managed to actually hit limiter, even in the wet when having a bit of fun, but I tend to be cautious about how high its reving.

7,800 is the factory,

mine had an auto box now a manual box, hasnt ever changed....i have it chiped and its still the same only the speed limited was put a fair bit higher.

it shouldnt have a problem reving that high even on stock turbo....just that you wont get stuff all power up there, so its kinda pointless to rev it that high. if you have an aftermarket turbo then go for it.

Ohh ok thanks man.

Yeah no point reving it that hard unless you get power that high, which you wont on standard turbo. I don't tend to rev it past 6,500rpm as it is now as it beings to struggle.

But once I get it tuned with the WOLF I will get the limiter set to about 7,800 rpm.

With my standard ecu, mine hits the limite at 8300 but my RSM says 7600ish at the time dont hold it long enough to write it down ;)

8,300 rpm damn, thats high. Weird how they are out so much hey?

LOL @ dont hold it long enough to write it down.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...