Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep - we are getting bigger and busier, and I need to get some help on the ground in Sydney.

In case you have no idea what I'm talking about - http://www.p1australia.com.au

It's a full time job, but probably not a reason to ditch your chosen career. You'd be better off working harder and becoming a member!

Basically - I need someone to take care of the cars when they come back in. Clean them, fill them, check tyres, oil etc - then deliver them to customers in and around Sydney. You'll be doing handovers with our customers - so being presentable and knowledgeable is a must! You'll be driving $500k supercars, so again having an excellent licence and insurance history is required.

You need to be over 25 too - sorry, insurance rules.

Just email me - [email protected] - for more info, or with covering letters/resumes etc.

Jarrod (R32Big_Boy) and Ryan (Belsil80) from SAU Vic do this for me in Melb - so feel free to ask them any questions as well.

We are the most exciting and fun place to work in the world - so if you want to join the team, get those resume's coming in!

Feel free to ask me questions in this thread.

J

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185697-want-to-touch-my-ferrari/
Share on other sites

To be honest I wouldnt think it would pay too much more. Not that I should comment but I have previously had a very very similar job and my mate has this job now and the money is around that dollar. Again obviously down to each job / specifications / kindness of the manager :D

Superb selection of cars though I must say. Would be a fantastic business to own!

Edited by Yidz

Pay... ah yeah, don't expect Matt Damon to play you in the movie of 'The Guy Who Cleans The Cars'.

It's more a Ben Afleck kind of role...

Will have the SEEK link up tomorrow for you.

I'd definately be interested in this.

I spent ~18 months working for Patrick Autocare so have some experience with new/luxury vehicles.

Insurance history is perfect. No at fault claims.

Driving history 2x 15kms and under + 1x 15-30kms speeding fines (last one was in December 2002).

I'm 25, would consider myself well presented and currently work in IT.

I'm sure you have people lining up out the door for a job like this but if you want any further info email me

[email protected]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...