Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good son of rajab theres been some corkers this weekend.

Its like making a cordial drink man. The aim is to make MORE drink, but at the same have the same strength taste. Uv got the ability with your big turbo to pour (move more air) more water into the glass, but where as a weak (lean) drink will just agitate you.. a lean mixture will uncontrollably ignite in your engine and pop it.

FPR (and pressure raise) + SAFC will allow some leeway... but really, if you KNOW you want power, and have a bigger tahbin in mind, grab a real aftermarket ECU and some injectors, sell the FPR and tune to your next bottleneck.

Its not just about a free flowing water source, u gota be able to accurately meter your cordial concentrate delivery, otherwise its weak city and boom.

Good son of rajab theres been some corkers this weekend.

Its like making a cordial drink man. The aim is to make MORE drink, but at the same have the same strength taste. Uv got the ability with your big turbo to pour (move more air) more water into the glass, but where as a weak (lean) drink will just agitate you.. a lean mixture will uncontrollably ignite in your engine and pop it.

FPR (and pressure raise) + SAFC will allow some leeway... but really, if you KNOW you want power, and have a bigger tahbin in mind, grab a real aftermarket ECU and some injectors, sell the FPR and tune to your next bottleneck.

Its not just about a free flowing water source, u gota be able to accurately meter your cordial concentrate delivery, otherwise its weak city and boom.

That my friend, is a GREAT analogy. very good

could've used scotch, but cordial's more PG I guess. No one likes watered down scotch.

Although there is a catch, if the wastegate in your turbo is set to a very low boost at standard then running it with no aftermarket ECU should be safe, it won't be the best, but it'll be safe. I mean, if you had a TD06 25G, and the wastegate was set to 8 PSI (hypothetically speaking of course) then its no different to a standard sized turbo with a wastegate set to 8 PSI, as after it reaches this amount of pressure both turbos will bypass. In fact being a bigger turbo you might find that at lower RPM's the turbo dosen't spool up fast enough to push as much air, and thereby gives you a RICHER mixture. However this is only if your bigger turbo runs an internal wastegate that's set to a close to stock pressure... most aftermarket turbos aren't.

Bottom line, your fuel needs to match the air going in, running rich or lean is not optimal... but too lean can be dangerous.

could've used scotch, but cordial's more PG I guess. No one likes watered down scotch.

Although there is a catch, if the wastegate in your turbo is set to a very low boost at standard then running it with no aftermarket ECU should be safe, it won't be the best, but it'll be safe. I mean, if you had a TD06 25G, and the wastegate was set to 8 PSI (hypothetically speaking of course) then its no different to a standard sized turbo with a wastegate set to 8 PSI, as after it reaches this amount of pressure both turbos will bypass. In fact being a bigger turbo you might find that at lower RPM's the turbo dosen't spool up fast enough to push as much air, and thereby gives you a RICHER mixture. However this is only if your bigger turbo runs an internal wastegate that's set to a close to stock pressure... most aftermarket turbos aren't.

Bottom line, your fuel needs to match the air going in, running rich or lean is not optimal... but too lean can be dangerous.

No entirely accurate.. a bigger turbo at standard boost will still flow more air then a smaller turbo at the same boost. Also the maps will be completely incorrect for the turbo flow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...