Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Flick - Do you have an RCD (Safety Switch) on your house? If all the power went off when you got the shock I would say you do, otherwise get one installed ASAP! And if you got the full 240V (iron may be rated to 260V, but Australian system is 240V), then yes you would have got the cramps as 240V contracts your muscles, meaning you wont let go of whatever is shocking you.. its actually the most un-safe voltage in the world :P

Higher voltages throw you off, lower voltages dont contract your muscles... stupid Brits and their 240V system!! LOL

(Note - Qualified Sparky here, cash jobs on weekends :( )

yeah we got a safety switch. Handy thing that..

Didnt get cramps or such, just scared the crap out of me more than anything, was quite a loud zap. Heart was probly racing cos i got so freaked out lol.

Such a girl tho... wasnt worried bout the fact i just zapped myself.. was more upset i couldnt straighten my hair lol

hahahahahahaahahaha.

how did ya manage to zap urself though??

i cant figure it out,

my uncle has an electric fence though around his 1 acre dog compound in the country and he has 2 alaskan malamutes and one day one of em was leaning on the fence and not getting zapped and i was thinking sweet it must be off.

go to climb through it and yeh dumbest thing i have ever done.

my hair was sticking up for about an hour or so afterwards. was best adrenilin rush ive ever had lol

Yeah me too Luke, was gonna buy a 044 and do an intank setup but I like the ease of the Nismo. I know it costs more but hey...

that's why i went nismo! 044/040 is still a fairly easy install in a 33.

Quick Q: would a 910 be just as good as the 044?

910 and a 040 are pretty much the same thing with a different fitting i think, an 044 is an external and bigger which isnt necessary for anything below 300rwkw

that's why i went nismo! 044/040 is still a fairly easy install in a 33.

910 and a 040 are pretty much the same thing with a different fitting i think, an 044 is an external and bigger which isnt necessary for anything below 300rwkw

I am thinking of getting bosch 044 pump but dont know how to install it....might require ur help if your willing to

040 is designed to be intank, 044 is designed to be external, some people put the 044 inside the tank but dont realise the o rings etc aren't meant to be submerged inside the tank. 040 is the largest intake you can get and will supply more than enough fuel for alot of people.

taken from sliding performance

Nismo In Tank Direct Replacement Fuel Pumps

R32 GTR Model Number : 17042-RR581, $499 Delivered

R33 GTR Model Number : 17042-RR596, $499 Delivered

R34 GTR Model Number : 17042-RRR46, $499 Delivered

R32 GTST Model Number : 17042-RRS31, $429 Delivered

R33 GTST Model Number : 17042-RRS41, $429 Delivered

R34 GTT Model Number : 17042-RRS51, $429 Delivered

S13 Silvia Model Number : 17042-RRS31, $429 Delivered

S13 180SX Model Number : 17042-RRS31, $429 Delivered

S14 Silvia Model Number : 17042-RRS41, $429 Delivered

S15 Silvia Model Number : 17042-RRS51, $429 Delivered

Price and delivery from Australia All fuel pumps delivered in 2-4 Days

GTR a bit more expensive heslo i see

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...