Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^^ i would to.

but its good that they didnt go to far with things.

shows, if we do the right thing (behave) the police will start to realise that we are not the ''typical'' ''hoon'' import drivers

meh, im just a whore, never mind me

Edited by craig R33

its true craig and as kellie said i think..

we are an australian wide clud cruising all the time! we keep it sensible and if anyone messes up they will be reported...

and hence y kellie gives her name out as the organiser over the cruise! to show them we are dead set about keeping it safe and under control!

wow i think this is one of my few quality posts! hahaha

Know how you feel there Craig (sick as a dog part!) Good to hear you had a great cruise everyone, glad I didn't make it now, if I didn't get defected last weekend I sure as shit would have tonight :bunny:

Night all :P

Yeah, i was down arndale way. There was a holdup of some sort at the chemist down arndale and were millions of cop cars. Got pulled over by Hanson rd

by 2 old dudes in a police Toyota Landcruiser. Got done for spacers on the rear. Not happy about it since all i was doing was driving but yeah ..... Anyone

have a stock R32 steering wheel lying around??

Hanson Road is one of those areas thats generally swarming with cops anyway (and the areas around it). Our training centre is on Grand Junction Road (shares the same facility as the MFS training centre)....and when i used to drive the 31 to trade school id CONSTANTLY get followed (even in its more stocker form that it was over the years. Would usually get pulled over and asked why i was so far from home LOL

if ya have any trouble finding parts let me know, ive got some random stuff laying around that may help ya

yeh steve 4 more road traffic coppers came.. spoke to dan and jenkies and kel and searched cars!

was interesting!!

copper says "whos family car" hahaha

I'm so glad they didnt wanna check out the family car!! LOL

Pulled this yesterday, not bad for my lack of mods, running about 9psi i think.

Sounds about right. Little more boost will pick up 20-30rwkw but its the mid range that is worth while. Accelerates you to that peak power considerably quicker.

Bugger injectors and tune the sucker on E85 for 240rwkw on the std turbo. :D

Nothing wrong with E85. I'll be grabbing myself some larger injectors and retuning.

Haha yeah i have plenty of plans Cubes :D The dyno i had it on is made for commercial vehicle tuning, and apparently readouts are always a little bit less then everywhere else. Should be getting my power fc soon, so ill have the AFR tuned a bit better. Might look at injectors too.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...