Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sure your not on drugs :):blush:

btw i have a R33 standard turbo your welcome to check out

cool steve, wat you looking to get for it?

why the choice of a gt 30/40 ryan???

what size exhaust housing you gonna choose??

still not sure as to what im gonna do yet with the rest but i like your set up.

maybe i should up grade to a gt35/40 and sell u mine but you'll have 2 go external gate and maybe change to a .63 housig to reduce lag

ive got a rb25 exhaust housing machined out for a gt 30/40 exhaust wheel for a internal wastegate setup still if u want it

steve im going to be selling my nismo 555 injectors real soon if u still interested as i have ordered new bigger sard one's

25 rear housing with a compressor that size isnt' really what im after...they rear tends to work too hard and they get too hot....If your interested in selling your 30/40 i would get an internal gate with a .63 rear fitted. Im very interested mate.

hmmmmmmmmm ill get sum prices tomorrow on the gt 35/40 and get back 2 ya

how much laggier will it be??

Nah they are a different body shape on the JZX110 chassis. You been on JZX100.com lately? Theres a picutre thread on there.

nah have not been on htere in ages... i have a look occasionally to check my "flame the nissan driver" thread :)

i'll have a suss

Sled, did you sus out whats going on the the 98 octaine fules yet??

just wondering ahead of my fe fill this tuesday.. =)

Sorry Luke, I did the whole Father's Day thingy yesterday with my Dad and my kids and since then I've been flat on my back with a bulging disc.

If I can get into the car at some stage I'll go and see the local BP.

Sled, did you sus out whats going on the the 98 octaine fules yet??

just wondering ahead of my fe fill this tuesday.. =)

your up till 1.30 nothing wrong with you doing a bit a e-search

JZX-100 FTW 1JZ chaser

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...