Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got a pic n how much dude?

like this one here mate, ill sell it for $20

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Nismo-Leath...sspagenameZWD2V

ive still got the stock knob out of my 180, i kept it when i got rid of the 180. i love the feel of it, and have never felt one that feels as good.

too much info ted :O

Edited by Sambo33
like this one here mate, ill sell it for $20

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Nismo-Leath...sspagenameZWD2V

too much info ted :O

hey man link doesnt work says item has ended or been removed

you need to re-install all your programs flick =(

you can copy files, but not the programs... despite what ted says

i disagree whilst some programs WILL need a proper installation a lot wont and if you want to take it to a smarty pants on the forum you can copy registry keys and load the keys up after dragging and dropping the only problem you will/may face is if the said program installs .dll's into windows directory but you would usually get a error about what file is missing :)

lol steve...

who thinks 13 is fair?

with all the goodies of course

sounds ok man got a few goodies :D gl with sale

300++ here you come.

Have you got internals done or you looking to find what the stockies can take first?

lol nah, gonna run max 1.1bar through stocky motor until i get it built hopefully once funds permit. Should still be lookin at around 260-270rwkw...Im actually looking forwards to less response more traction.

i disagree whilst some programs WILL need a proper installation a lot wont and if you want to take it to a smarty pants on the forum you can copy registry keys and load the keys up after dragging and dropping the only problem you will/may face is if the said program installs .dll's into windows directory but you would usually get a error about what file is missing :)

sounds ok man got a few goodies :D gl with sale

So i may need some help with this then. Re-installed my photoshop, but dont have my original serial number. Would like to copy it over to the new computer, as it has a few batches/scripts set up, that i dont know how to redo, as someone done them for me. Was hoping to copy the programme straight over so i could keep these scripts.. if that makes any sense

i take it the computer there coming from is a desktop ie unmovable easily

Both laptops.. Ill bring them both to Lukes saturday night (if i havent sorted it out by then). Few people that are going including u, might be able to help me with it

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...