Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

f**k all.

i see your point.

doesnt mean they wont bend you over when it comes to payment time.

Well it does take a fair bit of time, Tilbrook says 8 hours and Southern Hi tech said 10 hours, and thats for turbos only, so it must be a fairly hard job.

Try yourself Chad, I know I'm gonna attempt to do mine!

Im way to lazy, so i'll give Tilbrook a call and see what he's upto these days, when he shut up shop he said he would still work on my car, and at a discounted rate :)

:D Ask Heslo about PK's cocktails. :laughing-smiley-014:
And Eddy, they weren't PK's they were flicks cocktails :)
Same diff :P

haha, I think you'll find (from what I've heard) that PK was the teacher & Flick is now a well qualified student :)

Im way to lazy, so i'll give Tilbrook a call and see what he's upto these days, when he shut up shop he said he would still work on my car, and at a discounted rate :D

what happened with the turbo swap organized by Steve (at you know whose place)?

If you can get a decent price with a tune, I might be interested as well Chad........my back is still way too sore to be bending over all day otherwise I'd do them myself and I'd probably do yours and Luke Heslo's at the same time..........also, I'm over waiting for peeps to get back to me regardless of how busy they may be :(

fckn ROFL!

name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>&">
name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350" />
haha, I think you'll find (from what I've heard) that PK was the teacher & Flick is now a well qualified student :)

haha Too right! Cocktails are my specialty tho. Pk's Specialty is unusual shots.. just ask him bout the shot containing tobasco sauce.. thought i was gonna die after that one!

Few people from here can testify that my cocktails at lukes last party were pretty good!

haha Too right! Cocktails are my specialty tho. Pk's Specialty is unusual shots.. just ask him bout the shot containing tobasco sauce.. thought i was gonna die after that one!

Few people from here can testify that my cocktails at lukes last party were pretty good!

oh don't remind me, I'm still spewing I couldn't make it

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...