Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah I hate lag too. 350kw is bloody heaps for what I use the car for (daily) and would def get cam gears and cams.

Just depends on if I can find 34 N1's cheaper than the brand new garretts - and even then it might just be worth paying the difference to have brand new turbos... so I'm guessing -5's are what I should start saving for...

-D

Yeah I run 280kws and thats plenty for me on the road and track :P If I got the N1's could run more boost :P and get more of a rush :)

The 2nd hand R34 N1s do come up on teh forum often for around $2k...Just need someone that knows turbos to go with you to check there condition see if the wheels spin freely and no noise and see if they have shaft play :P

CRD where selling the 2530's -5 for an awesome price a little while ago...check them out here on SAU. So was another trader that Luke (heslo) was going to buy through, Wonder if he ever got his turbos??

Had a quick look at RB26 results: try this

18psi with high flowed steel wheels = 280 odd kws

18psi with -5s = 316kws .........

Only had a quick look - maybe there are others making more power on high flow steel wheels?? Post em up if you find them.....

hmmm, the reason i ask is the whole "defect" thing, and i could get my car thru regency with steel wheeled/hi flowed and not worry about having to take em off, put stock on, then do it all again once i pass as im under the impression regency only check the numbers on the side of the turbo?

hey Ben (Dohmar)

any chance you know the name of the dark grey sharks in this clip?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiM4YjTGI2I

Black one with red tail is called (funny enough) a red tailed black shark (Labeo Bicolor) (and they're bullies in the aquarium too). Theyre not really a shark, as theyre a member of the carp family.

The silver ones are called Emperor ID Sharks in the prelude to the clip, however thats just another name for Shark Catfish (yes, its a catfish). They look rather cool tho.

-D

ahhh cheers,

just doing some re-search as to what can live with what...

im thinkin of turning my 70 ltr into a tropical set up to get some practice before i move up

to the 300 ltr after my holiday.

Hey guys, got a bit of a pickle here as I didn't realize Ryan isn't working on people's cars and I was ment to get mine wired today (sorry to hear you got stuffed around bud, cheers for the help you did provide) so I really need to get my car wired up ASAP (loan car for work is now gone). Anyone got any experience in wiring up a series 1 RB25 to an R32? After help asap and am willing to pay cash and beers. Basically motor is all in ready to wire but I'm at a bit of a loss where to start. Gonna start reading what I can right now.

Give us a hoy if you can help and would like to earn some coin, will forever be in your debt.

250 is good power man, settle for that...it will stay very reliable too.

yeh i have to say 250 is a good power range... stoked as with 250 and responce...

cant find traction thou lol...

hmmm, the reason i ask is the whole "defect" thing, and i could get my car thru regency with steel wheeled/hi flowed and not worry about having to take em off, put stock on, then do it all again once i pass as im under the impression regency only check the numbers on the side of the turbo?

Yep they check the housing number on the side of the turbo. I don't know if there's any way for them to check if the turbo has been high-flowed, as there's no exterior differences? It's all internal?

Would -7's give similar power to stock or closer to the -5 ? -5 = quicker spoolup, is that correct?

Cheers

-D

Im pretty sure the -7 are the smaller ones, then -5 and -10 are even bigger. The numbers do not go in order of size for some strange reason.

My -5's come on full boost at 18psi at about 4500-5000rpm

Check out this thread

GT2860r-7 or -5 Responce

Here they all are; The reason the don't go in order is because the -X comes from the last number in the CHRA code and doesn't mean anything. The thing is with the -10's from the picture on the Garrett website the factory piping won't bolt up to the compressor outlet as they seem to have the S-Series 3 bolt flange not the GTR's 2 bolt flange. unless they have just showed a general picture of the GT2871R and it actually come with the GTR housing.

HP quoted is gross HP @ the flywheel;

GT2860R-7 310hp each

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...0R_707160_7.htm

GT2860R-5 360hp each

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...0R_707160_5.htm

GT2871R 52T-10 460hp each

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

Personally i think there is a better turbo than the -10 in terms of response. I have the same turbo as the -10 on my CA and it is reasonably laggy with full boost (17psi) coming at around 4000rpm, and that's with 1.8 litres "driving" the turbo. with two of these on a RB26 I can only imagine how laggy they would be with 1.3 litres "driving" each turbo.

The better option that I was talking about is the GT2871R 48 trim (the -10 is a 52T). This turbo is rated at 400hp but would be a lot more responsive than the -10, and are still rated at 800 gross FWHP. You will have to get GTR compressor housing fitted to it but it would be worth it.

GT2871R 48T 400hp

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...1R_743347_1.htm

Edited by D_Stirls
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...