Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

high revs are for small displacement honda's... see if you can make more torque out of the RB25 down low in the RPM.

But if you want to rev higher you'll need to remove the rev limiter on the ECU using either a cut defender or a modded ECU. You'll also have to make sure your engine and cooling can support higher revs.

Don't those hardcore GT-R motors spin to 11,000RPM?

only momentarily till their passenger side floorwell comes apart at the welds, flies free and chops someone's head off.

You may want to look at getting more power rather than more revs.

Whats the point in revving if your not making power?

Have to agree with this, no point having a car thats revving it's nuts off, all that you end up doing is making more noise and no extra power.

Here's a dyno chart of my car to prove that more revs don't equall more power. The dyno was done in 3rd gear and let go untill red line. Btw my car is running an after market ECU (GTS Link), I've kept red line at the factory limit as my car stops making power at around 6200rpm.

117rwkwR33.jpg

If you are wanting more top end power and get the engine reving harder you will need to open it up and replace the standard cams with something a little bigger, the down side of this it gets very expensive very quickly and you will also need to replace the stock ECU.

Edited by skyla

a lil off topic, but does anyone know when the speed cut kicks in, in a r33 gtst series 2? the car has a piggy back SAFC, would that make a difference? cheers

i know this is the NA section, but shouldnt make a difference right...

Do i need to change valve springs at all, or do anything like that??

nah, valve bounce is ideal.

on a more serious note you'd want to do some block and head work to see revs reliably

Eug, when you say chip it, what chip in particular?

cheers

karl

i prefer smith's thins.

you'd be looking at an aftermarket ecu or something like dr. drift (sam's) chips

The thought did cross my mind when it started flashing "danger to manifold".

lol

a lil off topic, but does anyone know when the speed cut kicks in, in a r33 gtst series 2? the car has a piggy back SAFC, would that make a difference? cheers

i know this is the NA section, but shouldnt make a difference right...

afaik its just a fuel and ignition cut at over 180km/h
if u were referring to my post...i dun quite understand lol

he was referring to yours.

basically speed cut at 180km/hr is a fuel & ignition cut. by having an SAFC it 'should' have removed it, check your manual. i know my SAFC2 has removed it.

Im with all of the above..

Learn to abuse the engine with the power it has now.

I do alot of togue style driving. I find that alot of the poke is ~4.5K and above (25DE VCT). Keep it above that when exiting the corner and you'll find the car is accutally quite quick! Even Id call it decently quick! ME! Who always bitches about how slow and heavy my car is!

I think the ideal thing you want that will suite all the criteria, a lightened flywheel. It will make the engine rev out quicker, you wont gain any power, perhaps a minisqule amount of torque. But the engine will be a whole much more user friendly!

Over that, the usual:

Port and polish

Cams (you will need to retune/chip, NA Z32 is a cheap alurnative)

and once cams are dont.. headers and zoers.. or the other way around is better..

BUT then you need block work.. rods, rod bolts.. and while your there.. shave.. and that all time and $$$ lots of $$$ and if you dont know how to do it.. some deadshit putting his paws all over the car.. and you dont know...

then with more power..

suspention - too much $$

brakes - *SPEW!*

oh fcuk it!.. the modification bussiness licks balls..

just be happy with what you have :) .. or buy an Elise

Edited by GTS4WD
Whats the point in revving if your not making power?

As long as you're not losing a great deal of power, a higher cutout gives you a bit more rev range to play with. Even if the power curve falls away a little, it can still have advantages.

I'll put it this way. My generation of VQ35DE has a stock redline of 6600RPM. I've bumped it up to 7200RPM. When me and a mate in similar cars were at Wakefield, we'd come out of Turn 2 and head up the hill. The distance to the next corner means that he hits the cutout probably a second before his braking point. That means he either has to bang it off the cutout, lift off the throttle, or grab another gear (and go back down a gear for the corner). All of which loses time. I just keep my foot pinned, and so I keep accelerating (albeit slowly) up to our braking point.

Even though I'm not making a great deal of power in that extra 600RPM, not having to stop accelerating gives me a major advantage in terms of my point to point speed.

Its the same if you're in a corner where your revs are up near redline. If you grab the next gear you lose a lot of punch, but with the stock cutout you might find yourself too close to the limiter.

Just remember that you can always short shift a car, regardless of what it revs to, and all else being equal the car's behaviour doesn't change. Allowing the engine to overrev past the cutout, on the other hand, is a lot more difficult.

Its just too brutal for me..

I see the advantages in this.. but i just dont think i have the heart to do it..

Stupid question but what exactly is the correct process of short shfting?.. I heard so many different interpretations of this I need to clear this up..

its not real smart revving an RB say more than 500 revs past the factory recommended...unless you are planning to do some internal upgrades...anyway a stock n/a RB wont make any more power by revving it to 8000...it will become breathless and past its efficiency point...all it will do is hurt the engine in the long run

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have no hard data to report, but I have to say, having driven it to work and back all week, mostly on wet roads (and therefore mostly not able to contemplate anything too outrageous anywhere)..... it is real good. I turned the boost controller on, with duty cycle set to 10% (which may not be enough to actually increase the boost), and the start boost set to 15 psi. That should keep the gate unpressurised until at least 15 psi. And rolling at 80 in 5th, which is <2k rpm, going to WOT sees the MAP go +ve even before it crosses 2k and it has >5 psi by the time it hits 90 km/h. That's still <<2.5k rpm, so I think it's actually doing really well. Because of all the not-quite-ideal things that have been in place since the turbo first went on, it felt laggy. It's actually not. The response appears to be as good as you could hope for with a highflow.
    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
×
×
  • Create New...