Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys

In the stages or tearing my engine down, ready for a rebuild.

There are a few retailes of RB30 Rods at the moment

- SPOOL

- ARGO

- Rod Factory

But whats got me confused is

Centre to Centre: some have 152.5mm and some have 155.5mm

Will either of the 2 work?

Anyone else come across this and what have you done

JD

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190554-rb30-rods-height-make-a-difference/
Share on other sites

Brad I spoke to you this morning about that, thanks for your help

Rods Factory, i know they are on ebay are 155.5mm

RacingPartsfactory.com also have them as 155.5mm

Will using the 155.5mm Rods pose a problem? I know they are 3mm longer, i am planning on using CP 8.2 Flat top Pistons with them

Edited by D1AUS

Umm yes - the pistom will protrude 3mm out of the bore and you wont be able to bolt the head on.

It just wont work - you will need to get a custom piston made to suit.

Brad I spoke to you this morning about that, thanks for your help

Rods Factory, i know they are on ebay are 155.5mm

RacingPartsfactory.com also have them as 155.5mm

Will using the 155.5mm Rods pose a problem? I know they are 3mm longer, i am planning on using CP 8.2 Flat top Pistons with them

But from my calculations, it is ok.

RB30 Specs

RB30 Deck Height - 9.075" (230.5mm)

Stroke - 85mm

Crank Throw - 42.5mm

Compression Height - 1.280" (32.5mm)

Using Spool/Argo Rods - 152.5 C/C

Deck Clearance = 230.5 - 42.5 - 152.5 - 32.5 = 3mm

Using RacingPartsFactory/Rod Factory Rods - 155.5 C/C

Deck Clearance = 230.5 - 42.5 - 155.5 - 32.5 = 0mm

Is that right by your calculations, therefore using either Rod, should not matter.

However, if you see an issue of deck clearance, you can always use RB25/26 pistons instead, as they have the same bore, but a smalled Compression Height

post-43743-1193213677_thumb.jpg

Edited by D1AUS

So that calculation above is wrong then??????????????????????

RB30 Compression Height - 1.280" (32.5mm)

RB26 Compression Height - 1.193" (30.3mm)

RB25 Compresson Height - 1.240" (31.5mm)

Using 152.5mm will yield 3mm Deck Clearance via that calculation

Using 155.5mm will yield 0mm Deck Clearnace via that calculation

Now thats even more confusing

Why not just use the Argo or Spool rods and be done with it? They both work without any issues?

Its not just a matter of simply using any rod. I'm trying to maximise the compression ratio etc with my setup. And with the calculations above and speaking to Distributor for CP in QLD.

Standard Rods have a 3mm deck height according to this calculation. As the CP RB30 Pistons are Dished not domed. Thats my arguement here.

Just trying to find out from others who have done this etc.

I understand Spool Rods are of good quality, but just seeing the available options to maximise the setup, thats all.

JD

Im building a 30/26 now with 9:1 comp using argo rods 152.4mm center to center

also using je custom piston compression ,height of 1.283,

0 deck height

havnt got the pistons yet but thats what i did to get the comp i want

Im building a 30/26 now with 9:1 comp using argo rods 152.4mm center to center

also using je custom piston compression ,height of 1.283,

0 deck height

havnt got the pistons yet but thats what i did to get the comp i want

Thanks for the feedback mate, I assume they are a domed piston????????

Im not trying to sell you my rods - just trying to explain that you are going to get in all sorts of shit of you use those ones with the 155.5 c/c

CP 8.2:1 are a flat top that come flush with the deck.

CP 9:0.1 are a domed piston. The flat of the piston come flush to the deck with a small dome in the centre.

CP RB30ET pistons have a small dish with valve reliefs.

To get 8.5:1 your prob best to use the 8.2:1 and skim the head - but obviously work backwards and cc everything first to calculate how much to take off the head.

Im not trying to sell you my rods - just trying to explain that you are going to get in all sorts of shit of you use those ones with the 155.5 c/c

CP 8.2:1 are a flat top that come flush with the deck.

CP 9:0.1 are a domed piston. The flat of the piston come flush to the deck with a small dome in the centre.

CP RB30ET pistons have a small dish with valve reliefs.

To get 8.5:1 your prob best to use the 8.2:1 and skim the head - but obviously work backwards and cc everything first to calculate how much to take off the head.

Brad

By all means i do appreciate all your help, thanks very much

I'm just going by all the figures at the moment. Obviously, I will dummy everything up check chamber cc etc.

Just by the specs, thats what i get from the calculation. I know standard rod is 152.5mm

From your experience, what is the standard deck clearance for RB30? standard parts

deck height is 0 rod length should be 6"{152.5m} dont use any other rod length

and yes my piston will be dome

if u use the cp piston u can buy the right one off the shelf for 8.5:1 comp

u will only achive this if ur block height is standard and combustion chamber cc's are close to standard{65cc"s from memory}

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
    • I hope that is not something that bad. From what i remember he said that only first gear is "hard" to get in and that he has couple of ideas what to try next but idk 😕  hope it is not gearbox out. I will let you know.
    • If it's not the hydraulics, it is probably gearbox back out. Usually as per @Duncan's post, or otherwise associated with not getting the throwout fork positioned correctly. All the way up to catastrophically bolting shit back together without it being aligned properly and wrecking the clutch/input shaft/flywheel/something else.
×
×
  • Create New...