Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh and when people read posts, maybe stop and think what mood your in, If your in a shitty mood then your more than likely going to read what someone has written in a angry way, when they were clearly not using bad taste when posting. eg SAU SA thread, simply suggesting ideas to help out, but NO flamed for helping. Respect for this joint and its users........GONE!!

agree. people expect to get their own way, and if they dont, they crack the shits. not just part of the car scene unfortunately.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190611-hi-guys/page/3/#findComment-4663556
Share on other sites

agree. people expect to get their own way, and if they dont, they crack the shits. not just part of the car scene unfortunately.

Unfortunately, everyone has internet nowdays and not necessarily brains to go with. I fall into that category at times too I admit. But we're all allowed to slip from time to time. No one is perfect. COmmunication is always best in person ... over the internet its too easily taken the wrong way depending on the mood of both parties.

We sincerely hope that the birth of SAU:SA will help the Skyline car community become a bit more closely knit ... so there's less "cracking the shits" and more communication face to face.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190611-hi-guys/page/3/#findComment-4663591
Share on other sites

nah we gota talk about it for 3days then let him back on in 2weeks and have these same convos a month later

thus is the sau cycle.

u all know how to search of 1 persons posts yeah? about 6outa 10 i reckon is abuse to 1 person or another :D but yeahs im ova it dont bother me

Edited by Inline 6
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190611-hi-guys/page/3/#findComment-4663945
Share on other sites

he aint speaking his mind read his posts, they are clear abuse at everyone he crosses paths with

as i said the main 1s get deleted and i would rather not repeat what he said.

whos kissing whos rear? i just tell it how I see it

why we arguing u know hell be back its enevatable

hell continue abusing ppl and never apoligize to the people he upsets

the closed thread about starting a club has some quality ted in there, most again deleted but some of his flair

Edited by Inline 6
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190611-hi-guys/page/3/#findComment-4663970
Share on other sites

did you just call me fat???? im not fat im festively plump.........Im not fat...im big boned!!!!.....some people say they have a 6 pack...i have the whole keg!!....its not a gut...its a fuel tank for a sex machine....its just running on gas at the moment

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190611-hi-guys/page/3/#findComment-4664063
Share on other sites

did you just call me fat???? im not fat im festively plump.........Im not fat...im big boned!!!!.....some people say they have a 6 pack...i have the whole keg!!....its not a gut...its a fuel tank for a sex machine....its just running on gas at the moment

wasnt talking about u ya cudly teddybear :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190611-hi-guys/page/3/#findComment-4664080
Share on other sites

for the record, me and ted are just saying what a lot of people are thinking, the issue is some mods are creating an environment where anyone who opposes them gets raped by their mod powers. If SAU meant enough to me these days that i couldnt handle not getting banned, or on the bad side of a few of it's members, then i might keep my mouth shut too. but the honest truth is this section has gone to shit, and id rather voice my opinion and get banned than continue to keep my mouth shut and play along with this shit.

as u can tell, i get bored quickly, doing this shit is the only way to keep this section worth coming to.

he aint speaking his mind read his posts, they are clear abuse at everyone he crosses paths with

as i said the main 1s get deleted and i would rather not repeat what he said.

whos kissing whos rear? i just tell it how I see it

why we arguing u know hell be back its enevatable

hell continue abusing ppl and never apoligize to the people he upsets

the closed thread about starting a club has some quality ted in there, most again deleted but some of his flair

u get to a point where all u can do is just go all out and give people shit.

i might point out that the main reason it all went to shit last night was because ted reported an illegal post made by SLED personally attacking me, and SLED came back and made some poor excuse and went on to insult ted.

seriously, what do u expect us to do? we play by the rules the mods just make a mockery of it, so what's the point?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190611-hi-guys/page/3/#findComment-4664111
Share on other sites

for the record, me and ted are just saying what a lot of people are thinking, the issue is some mods are creating an environment where anyone who opposes them gets raped by their mod powers. If SAU meant enough to me these days that i couldnt handle not getting banned, or on the bad side of a few of it's members, then i might keep my mouth shut too. but the honest truth is this section has gone to shit, and id rather voice my opinion and get banned than continue to keep my mouth shut and play along with this shit.

Agreed, It also confirms this when you get PM's saying thankyou for posting what you have posted.

Ive never personally met Nisskid or Ted, so im not agreeing with them just because i might be their mates, heck even Stu and i have come to disagreements on NS and more than likely here in the past.

Mods? anyone want to PM me about deleting accounts?? Anyone? And dont give me that shit about we cant delete accounts, because Prank wants a massive list of members for his beloved forum, so it can attract sponsors!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190611-hi-guys/page/3/#findComment-4664146
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...