Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's actually spelt "Navtrak". But even after searching for that on Google, I can only find a few references. I found 2 links to "http://www.navtrak.com.au" but that URL doesn't work. Maybe they let their domain expire. I can't find any telephone numbers either.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19062-navtrack/#findComment-402851
Share on other sites

Hey

I when i first bought my skyline a few months ago, i looked at getting various traking systems installed, ie, navtrack and quicktrak...

From the information i found, navtrack was actually only doing a trial in australia, and they dont exist in this country anymore, im not sure if the users were even informed of this..

A while back i saw a post where a guys car was backed into, and his navtrack alarm didnt go of, so he intentiaonally set ot off(after lots of effort), and he still did not hear from navtrack as he should have.

So i might be wrong, but i have a feeling they packed up n got outa here....

so yea i ended up gettin quicktrack.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19062-navtrack/#findComment-405331
Share on other sites

well i know that if u go with Propserion, u gotta have Navtrak. 1600 install, including first year coverage. After that 300 yr for coverage. Has 3 pt immobiliser and ur car is tracked via GPS. I maybe wrong, but does Qiktrack go via GSM? Mobile network?

Well i've heard completely different things about Navtrak, i heard a full setup had been done, security cars get sent out to check our ur car if the alarm goes off. U get SMS notification that the alarm went off, or u get a call from them. Unless i'm getting myself completely confused with Qiktrack services. Anyways, do a search, i think i remember quite a lengthy thread about this a couple of months back.

cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19062-navtrack/#findComment-405706
Share on other sites

Originally posted by rb20-calais

Qiktrak is upgrading their network as we speak, they also cover sydney metro, brisbane metro, melbourne metro... soon newcastle and wollongong.

Evan

They have been saying that since 1997, when I got my first car and installed a Quiktrak system in it.

As I drove around to different areas of Sydney, I would pull over, arm the car and set off the alarm to test their coverage. I must have done this about 20 times in the 2 years I owned that car, and NOT ONCE did they call me.

I ended up having to call them and ask if they knew the alarm, was going off, and they said "uhhh we can't tell you that Sir.", even after I verified I was the owner of the car. Then I asked them to please unlock the car, as I left my keys in it, and it was then that they had to admit that they had absolutely no idea where my car was.

I sure hope their network has improved since then. :D

edit: the problem with Quiktrak is that they use their own broadcast towers, and as such, they have a VERY VERY limited range.

Navtrak relies on the GSM network, so anywhere that you have mobile coverage, your car is being monitored.

NRMA CarCom takes this one step further and incorporates a backup GPS tracking system AS WELL AS the GSM network.

I think it's pretty plain to see which one is the best, don't you?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19062-navtrack/#findComment-405950
Share on other sites

I wrote the stuff in italics, I made it italics to show why I edited the post.

Well then NRMA Carcom and Navtrak are both infinitely superior to Quiktrak's proprietary radio network, which has extremely limited reception/coverage.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19062-navtrack/#findComment-406112
Share on other sites

Ah ok, well i must be misinformed, but to confirm this, can someone point me in the direction of the navtrack website, or even give me a phone number to contact navtrack on, cuz when i was lookin i couldnt find anything on them, cept a web site that does not work..

So ill still be suspicious about their existence untill i speak to them myself, but of course in theory i would agree that navtrack sounds much better.

But then again, i have had quiktrack for about 4 months, and the alarm has been set off in various places around sydney, especially bondi/city/chatswood and every time i have gotten a phone call, not once has the alarm gone off and i didnt get a call, so merli, maybe things have changed, or maybe you drive to different places to me...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19062-navtrack/#findComment-407279
Share on other sites

Well yes, as I said that was in 1997 when I bought my first car, so I sure hope things have improved. I currently have my car with Quiktrak because that's what the previous owner put on there.

But yeah, it still stands that a GSM/GPS based tracking system would be FAR superior to a proprietory radio network...

I'm still deciding whether I should rip out the Quiktrak and go with CarCom...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19062-navtrack/#findComment-407289
Share on other sites

Navtrak ceased public sales and direct trading about 2 mths ago.

The system they used was GPS/GSM and they had supply problems getting the transponder units as they were sharing the technology and supply with another company (which is still running, and installing these transponders, but not as a "theft tracking" system)

Those that have existing Navtrak "theft security" systems installed are still being monitored by the 3rd party company that was set up to control this part of the service. They should be offered renewals by this company.

At this stage, there are only about 3 companies offering units for sale..

Car Com is NOT one of them - they have done the same as Navtrak and ceased trading to the public - the company who supplies Car Com units is Intellimatics and they now concentrate on Holden Assist vehicle tracking.

Thales (prononouced Tallis) Telematics offers the Orchid Tracking system ( the same one as fitted to BMW and Mercedes) - it uses GPS/GSM

Novatronics offers a similar GPS/GSM system

QuikTrak are still radio tower based - and are limited to Sydney, Brisbane / Gold Coast and Melbourne Metro areas only.

I hope this helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19062-navtrack/#findComment-408350
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...