Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all.

Just wondering what kind of power numbers I would expect to get form my 32 GTR with the following done to it.

Apexi Power FC with boost controller.

Sard 800cc injectors.

HKS 272 deg cams

Adjustable cam gears

N1 turbos.

Head been port and polished.

Bosch 044 fuel pump.

I was hoping to get over 350 rwkw. Am I dreaming or not. If I am what else do I need to do to get those sort of numbers.

The car is currently making around 250 @ 14psi.

Edited by GTROB
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190647-power-out-put-from-r32-gtr/
Share on other sites

A GTR with an exhaust, stock turbos, Power FC, cam gears and 14psi will usually make in the region of 250rwkw so considering your car has larger turbos and cams, your current power output is a little down on what it could be.

I think the deciding factors will be:

A) Your Tune

B) The type of N1 turbos you are actually running (R32/R33 or R34?)

C) How much boost you plan to run

Also, are you running a full aftermarket exhaust ie larger front pipes and dump pipes at the moment?

I still dont have any of this stuff installed. So its making that power with all stock parts. Yes it has after market exhaust.

A GTR with an exhaust, stock turbos, Power FC, cam gears and 14psi will usually make in the region of 250rwkw so considering your car has larger turbos and cams, your current power output is a little down on what it could be.

I think the deciding factors will be:

A) Your Tune

B) The type of N1 turbos you are actually running (R32/R33 or R34?)

C) How much boost you plan to run

Also, are you running a full aftermarket exhaust ie larger front pipes and dump pipes at the moment?

350 is going to be a stretch for N1s

Think of ballpark figure closer to 300-320

Not if we are talking about R34 N1's

The last car that I saw running them was a stock engine'd R32 producing a touch over 330awkw on 19psi.

Yeah, totally depends on which N1's.

R32 arent even worth having on the car IMO. Especially the BIG 32 ones, just too laggy.

R33 is a bit better but not great

R34's are the business and will get 330rwkw or there abouts. Basically the same as GT-SS turbos.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...