Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

guys, it's only really funny to make fun of someones english speaking ability for about the first 5 or so pages. after that it gets less and less funny all the time. trust me on this.

Haha and how can you gauge that '5 or so' is appropriate? :)

I think BKC is loving it, he talks like an online Yoda :D

The force is strong in him, though his GT-R knowledge isn't.

Edited by R338OY
  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

this argument is retarded

if bkc were into V8's, he'd be trying to tell anything with ears how much better an iron head and block, carbied, Holden 308 is than the current alloy Chev 6.0 litre job.

go away son- this thread has well and truly out-lived it's usefulness (i.e- to make you look like a fool and give us a laugh)

notice the sign off and readable english... no... notice the sign off....

how big is the back seat though ? enough room to rumble the rear axle or is this another on the bonnet deal?

notice the sign off and readable english... no... notice the sign off....

how big is the back seat though ? enough room to rumble the rear axle or is this another on the bonnet deal?

The interior is too nice for that.

And i'd worry about scratching the bonnet.

It's on the road i reckon. :D

This is the first thread I have read on this forum and I want the last 10 minutes of my life back.

Pointless comparason really. The RB and VR are separated by 20years of engine design & technology. Saying that in EVO magazine (a performance car magazine from the UK) it mentions that the VR engine will essentially be a handbuilt unit in a similar vein to the Mercedes AMG engines (so perhaps any comparasons should be with a handbuilt RB such as a Nismo RB26 S1 engine - even then the VR is superior). It also mentions that to sidestep the domestic gentlemans agreement the car has an "untuneable" engine management to prevent the cars from being tuned. It is reputely that advanced that It can detect differences in air flow caused by tuning parts like air filters, intercoolers etc. It also logs this information to tell dealers. Having said that still doesnt deter people from having a go : -

mines testing a GTR

http://drive.gtchannel.com/?c=125&a=1515

Bkc lay off the crack pipe and try babelfish instead.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...