Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have recently purchased a R32 ECU mapped to suit RB25DET tuned for the same mods as my car and installed it. Now as this is a R32 ECU there is no output to control the VCT so I believe I need to purchase a Vtec type controller to switch it off and on like the factory ECU would.

Now I have a question firstly regarding this, is the VCT controller on the RB25 just a on / off device that the ECU switches on or does it require a special pulsing signal or such like? I ask as I plan to just use a VTEC controller if I can. Will this work just as effectively as stock once setup?

Now the next question is regarding pinout differences between the ECU's. My car idles at 1500rpm and after spending hours on here searching it would appear a few pins are different on the ECU's

RB25 Pinout http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/ip...ECU_Pinouts.jpg

RB20 Pinout http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/ip...ECU_Pinouts.jpg

My question is which wires to move where? It looks like the Pin 54 output of the R32 ECU needs connecting properly to the R33 loom which says its not connected or whatever the NC stands for but which others as I would like it to behave just like normal.

Any information from someone that has done the complete conversion would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance for replies.

Edited by nigelswazi

hi nigel

the rb25 vct is based on TPS and comes on when throttle is opened, presumably past 0.33v on the TPS

once its past 4500rpm the VCT is no longer active and turns off.

/* RB25 VCT switching */

#define ON 1

#define OFF 0

#define VCT 1

#ifdef VCT

If (TPS > 0.33 && RPM < 4500) {

switchVCT(ON);

}

#endif

ive got an apexi VAFC coming my way and im going to try and use it to control the stock VCT

i dont think it will work but ill give it a shot. you can also check out the CAMCOM controller i think from buddy club or something like that - its on nengun.com under electronics

From comparing the ECU pinouts the R33 loom covers all pins identically except for the following:

On RB20 ECU Pin 54 Throttle Valve Switch (Idle Connection)

On RB20 ECU Pins 56/57 Im assuming are the same as the R33 although every ECU pinout for the RB25 listed those too pins under different names AT/ABS/LSD Control Units for both.

Then the only difference is Cyl No 4 & 6 Injector GNDs are the wrong way around but if it is batch fire it won't make a difference if it is sequential then these should ideally be swapped. Then the R33 Pin 133 needs to be connected to a external VCT controller to maintain factory VCT specs.

Can anyone confirm what changes are required and give any good recommendations of VCT controllers

camcon controller (should be fine)

apexi vafc (maybe)

gizmo have a camFC device (should be fine)

autospeed have a home-made device i think

dick smith / jaycar have a home-device relay switching device

Out of curiousity, why would you want to keep the variable cam timing? Doesn't it cause a bit of problems trying to tune with it for high horsepower applications? Like i hear about a lot of cars that push around 250-300 at the wheels and don't bother retaining the cam timing by either not tuning with it, or replacing the cam gear or cam. Can some one shed some light on this?

Cheers.

Out of curiousity, why would you want to keep the variable cam timing? Doesn't it cause a bit of problems trying to tune with it for high horsepower applications? Like i hear about a lot of cars that push around 250-300 at the wheels and don't bother retaining the cam timing by either not tuning with it, or replacing the cam gear or cam. Can some one shed some light on this?

Cheers.

I would like to keep it as the low down torque has decreased quite noticeabley. I can tell the ECU is better once its on boost especially on my AFR guage its a way better tune I just want my low rpm torque to be optimised as I do a lot of city driving.

Does anyone know which pin on the R33 pinout is the same as Pin 54 Throttle Valve Switch on the RB20 ECU?

I use a micro switch on the throttle body of my S2 RB25 connected to pin 54. When TB closed switch is armed. I had the same problem of high idle when I first connected the 32 ecu. This switch fixed the problem.

  • 3 weeks later...

Nigel,

Lee here (bought the springs/top hats etc). How did you go getting the ECU running? Im thinking of purchasing a re-tuned RB20 ECU for my car also, and would like to know your experiences. Did you get it working ok in the end, and do you think it was worth the money to go this path?

Cheers

Lee

From memory, doesnt the 32 ECU have a trimpod on the side of it to control its idle speed?

Also, I just had a dyno session yesterday and found that leaving the VCT unplugged gained me around 10kW and made my torque curve much stronger and smoother without any real hesitation down low, Im no longer a fan of VCT. 215.4kW @ rears on stock 33 turbo seals those thoughts for me. :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...