Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Just a quick question, does anyone know how much approximately power loss is there from the engine to the rear-wheels in a Skyline??

I got told it is about 80% but is this general for all rwdrive cars??

It seems that alot of the guys here have their car dyno and just wondering what was the reading for the engine output compare to the rw output.

The reason I ask is that i went for a spin in my car (R33 GTST) with a G-tech meter and got a pretty low hp reading. It was only like 170 hp at the rear wheels which in kilowatts is about 120 if my calculation is right.

That's in a car with me and one passnger, runing 11psi with catback exhaust.

Any input??

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19525-power-lost-from-engine-to-wheels/
Share on other sites

With those G-Techs it's important to get the weight and other factors correct. But even so, they aren't that accurate. A dyno is the only sure way, but even still...different dynos on different days will give different results.

I have heard that the power lost from the engine to wheels is about 15% on a RWD car. On an AWD it's a bit more, like 20% or even more. There has always been a lot of debate about this. Whether it's a certain %, and if so what %? Or is it a fixed amount of power and not a %? I don't really know if anyone really knows? :)

The reason I say it is low Dan is because if (my theory haha) a stock GTST has 185kw at the engine and if there is a 80% power lost through drivetrain etc. There should be still 148 rwkw right?!?! 185X.80=148 or am I mean to minus the 148 to 185?? That's mean it is only 37kw@rw!!

That's is why I think it is abit low I was hoping that my car would have maybe close to 190 kw at the engine hehe

Cheers

:)

But how many skylines actually have that amount of power? Brand new, yeah. But after a few years, things don't work as well, rotating parts don't spin as fast and make as much power...etc.

Hiep: Nah, I'm pretty sure that a RWD loses no more than 15%. Some people say AWD lose more like 25%.

Damn I want a chaser!! How much are they? $50k? Too much!!!

Well when I first had my EVO4 dynoed on an AWD dyno, it only put 123kW@wheels on 11psi. Then on 16psi is pumped out 155kW@wheels. Seeing that a standard EVO4 is supposed to have 206kW@engine, which I'm pretty sure mine didn't...it's still a huge power loss. For RWD cars, I'm not sure. But again it depends on temperature as well, cos at the time it was at the beginning of the year and the weather was still pretty hot. I'm sure a few more kW could be had on cooler weather.

The 'rule-of-thumb' is around 30%.

EVOIV, the G-Tech is supposed to be remarkably accurate. But it has to be set up properly.

I had a run up on AVO's DTS dyno. This dyno is supposedly capable of calculating fwkw from rwkw.

My R32 GTS4 (RB20DET 4WD) ran:

115 4wkw

145 rwkw

175 fwkw (calculated from rwkw)

Do the calculations of loss yourselves.

I still think 20% to 30% is a little too big.

Hiep: At one stage my car had 206kW@4wheels, but that power was recorded on a dyno (at the wheels). To record power at the engine, you would need to take the engine out I believe?

If I account for a 30% loss, that makes it around 290kW@engine. Almost 400hp.

In a recent motor mag:

Dyno Dynamics Dyno:

*Ford Falcon XR8 5.4 V8:

260kW @ fly, 193rwkW, 24.6% power loss

*Holden Monaro CV8 5.7 Gen 3 V8:

235kW @ fly, 189rwkW, 19.6% power loss

*HSV GTS Coupe, Gen 3 V8:

300kW @ fly, 222rwkW, 26% power loss

*HSV Clubsport Gen 3 V8:

260kW @ fly, 196rwkW, 24.6% power loss

*FPV Falcon GT 5.4 V8:

290kW @ fly, 225rwkW, 22.4% power loss

*Ford Falcon XR6 4.0 inline six turbo:

240kW @ fly, 185rwkW, 25% power loss.

Consider a RWD car loss between 20 - 25%.

Quote:

Hmm...interesting figures there.

It's kinda weird cos one time I saw a figure of an R34GTR that was dynoed as RWD and AWD and the readouts were the same!???

This should be true, as i understand. GTRs are basically RWD until they detect rear slip (on a dyno there shouldn't be any), at which point a power is apportioned to the front wheels. So the difference should be negligible between RWD and AWD for a GTR.

Hey Skylineakt - did you get any 0 - 100kmh or 1/4 mile figures from the G-Tech. Would be interesting to know what they are cos it will give a good idea of whether your car is performing ok.

I believe you have to wiegh your car before using the G-Tech. Don't just use the factory wieght figures. You have to consider driver and a passenger if any and the amount of fuel should be similar when u wiegh it and test it on the G-Tech.

25-30% .. that is why when you work out the power/weight ratio of say a modified skyline to any of these "top" aussie cars, the skyline still comes out on top.. on the street its pretty much the same I've found. Its all about the weight, and the aussie cars just keep getting heavier and heavier.

Ronin: interesting figures.. thanx for those.. so much heresay.. unless its all measured in a proper testing environment (e.g. same dyno) its hard to compare apples with apples.

Skylineakt: There is talk of a dyno day in melbourne with the VIC SAU crew. Al said he'd try bringing some vehicle scales so we can do some interesting calculations as well as receive dyno figures. Get along and find out for sure - it should be within the next couple of weeks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • yeah first and reverse is where you will find clutch release issues (whether hydraulic or mechanical) because the difference in revs required is the highest there; particularly changing down from 2nd to 1st when still moving. To be clearer though, it is possible that the clutch release bearing is the wrong height. This is less likely than a hydraulic issue but it is not unheard of when you are mixing and matching
    • Quite right, if you make it to that pension you deserve every cent
    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
×
×
  • Create New...