Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Folks, the 'fixed' or 'rule of thumb' power loss is a fallacy.

Lets say Car A has a 100 hp engine, and measures 70hp at the rear wheels. Thats a 30% loss through the drivetrain.

The same Car A, except I replace the engine with a 350 Chev rated at 300hp. Without changing anything in the transmission or drivetrain, is it fair to say there still will be a 30% loss? All of a sudden the transmission and drivetrain is soaking up 60 more hp for no reason? Nope.

Without putting an engine on an engine dyno, any power at the crank figures are pure guesswork. Look at the top fuel cars in the States - for years they have been working out their engine power using mass x acceleration, reconing that their engines produced 6,000hp...not so long ago they worked out how to measure the torque they output with a special torque sensor in the drivetrain and now say their engines are putting out 9,000hp! Thats a 3,000 hp difference. The guys who did the initial calculations are like the top engine builders, so they are in no way backwards or stupid.

Car manufacturers also measure their engines power outputs in different ways (eg with no accessories like alternators or power steering pump) so what they may quote in their sales brochures has as much substance and use as a used tissue.

Be careful with the car weights as well, I used to own a G-Tech and once measured my car on two different certified weighbridges on the same day. Weight 1 with a full tank and me was 1535kg, weight 2 was 100kg less. Both of these weigh bridges were commercial and recently tested and certified. I figure the 1535kg weight to be the correct one.

G

These are Top fuel cars - they look like a long rail with the engine at the back. Can't compare them to any form of road car! Does the quarter in about 4.6 seconds at about 300 mph.

gal_photo1a.jpg

Picture big alloy v8's of about 8.9 litres pulling 8500 rpm, a supercharger pushing in 1,640 cubic meters of air a minute, burning 4 litres of nitromethane a second (the fuel is 3 times more efficient than petrol)

gal_photo8a.jpg

G

Sheesh! That's some serious stuff!!! I'm guessing you'd soil your pants too when behind the wheel of one? :) Just a question, why a supercharger? What are the benefits of that over a turbo? I know that superchargers have less (or no) lag cos they don't use exhaust gases to spool them up. But why is it that nowadays the turbo seems more popular than the supercharger? Anyone?

Superchargers are driven off the crankshaft and rob a fair about of power - their main advantage over a turbo is that they produce boost at all revs. On the flip side, they can be noisy, they use belts which need checking and careful maintenance. And cost lots!

I think turbochargers are more popular for economic reasons - they cost less, and produce some very nice results as our Skylines can attest.

Oh and those top fuel engines - they last one run on the drag strip. Often when you watch them on TV you can see a cylinder or two die halfway down the strip...sometimes they expire in spectacular fireballs. The crews rebuild the engines between runs, it's amazing to watch them work - look out for the NHRA drags on ESPN etc.

G

GraemWi: No they do not rebuild the engines every run. They ususally just take off the sump and make sure all the gallieries are cleared and some other general maintanice. But they definately dont rebuild them all the time.

Also that puff of smoke that u usually see is most of the time just wheelspin. Some times it is an engine letting go, but almost all of the time, the top fuelers loose traction down the strip and make puffs of smoke.

Nar DanS15 we didn't do any run tesing for 0-100 or 1/4 mile times. The road we were testing were getting a bit busy, so we left it hehe :wave:. I'll try again with next time with a different weight measurement. This time we will take in consideration of our weight and the fuel weight. Maybe I'll have to test it near an empty tank as I wouldn't have a clue how much fuel will weight at full tank etc.

Predator: Yeah that will be intresting to know what's going on at the dyno day. Do you know when is it or where is it??

SORRY GUYS maybe I should of mention this earlier but don't know it this matters or not to my rw output but my car is an AUTO... ;)

Originally posted by EnricoPalazzo

GraemWi: No they do not rebuild the engines every run. They ususally just take off the sump and make sure all the gallieries are cleared and some other general maintanice. But they definately dont rebuild them all the time.

Also that puff of smoke that u usually see is most of the time just wheelspin. Some times it is an engine letting go, but almost all of the time, the top fuelers loose traction down the strip and make puffs of smoke.

I've watched drag racing for quite a few years, there is quite a big difference between loosing traction and a cylinder carking it.

G

Originally posted by GraemeWi

Superchargers are driven off the crankshaft and rob a fair about of power - their main advantage over a turbo is that they produce boost at all revs. On the flip side, they can be noisy, they use belts which need checking and careful maintenance. And cost lots!

Supercharger units themselves don't actually cost that much more than turbos. You can get a Yella Terra roots style blower for around $2000. Even the Vortech centrifugal blowers aren't much more than that for a smallish one. But then you need the manifold mods, the belts, bigger injectors, computer reprogram, water injection, etc, which is why you usually see Commodore (etc) supercharger kits for around $5000-6000 (or more).

The advantage of turbos on our cars is we already have everything there - when upgrading/replacing the turbo (unless the replacement is a huge monster) then we just have to buy the turbo unit itself. We also get a small refund if we manage to sell our old turbos ;)

The main reason why superchargers tend to cost at least a little more than a cheap Garrett turbo is because they're mostly made in America. But compare a Vortech or Powerdyne blower with a HKS or Trust turbo and you might find the superchargers are quite a bit cheaper.

EVOIV - I think the main reason that turbos are more popular than superchargers with performance enthusiasts aside from the cost savings on cars that already have turbos is because you can play with the boost.

If there was an NA car that you wanted to put forced induction on, a turbo would be the way to go for big power gains, although it would generally cost more to do properly than a supercharger.

A supercharger is generally a budget option because they have relatively low boost and drain power from your engine to run (cost more in fuel, less power from same pressure as a turbo). It's more of a "set and forget" mod.

Originally posted by Ronin 09

This should be true, as i understand. GTRs are basically RWD until they detect rear slip (on a dyno there shouldn't be any),...

There is slip at the rear, relative to the front wheels (the fronts are stationary). That's why you have to disable the front drive of a GT-R on a RWD dyno.

Thanks for the info. on the supercharger vs turbocharger. I didn't really know how the supercharger worked..but thanks for the enlightenment, which makes sense why turbos are more common for power upgrades. But I still am a little confused as to why a GTR with 2 wheels spinning on a dyno gives the same reading as the same car with 4 wheels spinning on a 4WD dyno. The physics of it just doesn't make sense? Weird...oh well. Just shows that GTR is king!!! :)

Power is rate of work. If you have 4 wheels spinning on the dyno, you have half the power going to each end as you would if you just had the rears on. Of course you have to throw in a little 4wd drivetrain loss as well if you're running all 4 wheels, but it should work out to be roughly the same.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
    • I'm not going to recommend an EBC pad. I don't like them. Just about anything else would suit me better. I've been using Intima pads for a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...