Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

howdy folks,

story goes that i lost my turbo and possibly my engine. havent had the engine checked out yet, but my mate has a compression tester so we thought we'd have a go and see if we could learn anything.

EDIT: r33 rb25det, stock turbo, 87000km, 10000km on motor, 3" turbo back, pod, not much else.

unfortunately it started raining so we only got through the first 3 cylinders (front to back). cylinder 2 and 3 got 140psi dry, which sounds fine to my limited knowledge, but cyl 1 apparently has 0psi compression!

the needle on the tester doesnt budge at all!

admittedly i am unknowledgable in this department, but im thinking that could be because the piston is smashed, theres no rings at all, or the valves are jammed open. thoughts?

just by shining a torch in im pretty sure the piston is moving, and it doesnt have a hole that i can see. we also took off the valve cover on the inlet side (thinking maybe the turbo bits had smashed the valves) but everything seemed fine there.

im quite sure it will need to be rebuild, but as i bought the damn thing freshly rebuilt 6 months ago, and now this has happened inside 10000kms, i am rather annoyed and want to know what happened.

any help greatly appreciated!

Edited by gt-ahhh!
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195292-0psi-compression/
Share on other sites

did the car have a dead miss when running? like was it running on 5 cylinders all through the rev range and not just at idle? its nearly impossible to get 0 psi reading if your piston is in one piece. as even with no rings on there is still some sort of compression. what sort of guage are you using? screw in or push in? also whats the next number after 0 on your guage?

i doubt the valve would be jammed open cause the rb25 isnt a free running motor, which means if the valve stays open the piston will smash into it which isnt a good thing haha.

i mate of mine had a sr20det that pulled 0psi on one piston, but that had severe detenation and the piston had a massive hole in it so its possible. Finish off the rest of the test and see what comes up

did the car have a dead miss when running? like was it running on 5 cylinders all through the rev range and not just at idle? its nearly impossible to get 0 psi reading if your piston is in one piece. as even with no rings on there is still some sort of compression. what sort of guage are you using? screw in or push in? also whats the next number after 0 on your guage?

it runs like a bag of ass, and someone told me it was missing but im not sure.

its a screw in gauge, and its analog with a needle so there are many numbers in between 0 and 300 or so. with the other cylinders it quickly went up and sat on 140. cyl 1 it didnt budge!

it blows a bit of smoke out of the pcv? if that means anything.

i'd say you have a severly melted piston, or missing a nice chunk of it. But you would have a lot of piston blowby, and it would blow alot of smoke

as in clouds of smoke out the exhaust? its got that when you rev it even slightly...

Try doing the test again properly when its not raining, I mean if it was raining, was the test on that cyl completed properly? or rushed?

nah, we tried it at least 5 times. same everytime. it was only after we decided to pull the valve covers off, had a look, and then went to test cyl 4,5,6 that it started raining.

Story goes you lost your turbo, how much boost were you running? Sounds like piston damage, leaned out and bad detonation. Start pulling it out....

stock boost. all its got is a pod and a 3" turbo back. i think it may also have a dump pipe because it was 180rwkw which seems a pretty good return from such minimal mods.

i think the engine went first and possibly caused the turbo failure from lack of oil or debris. i hoping this is the case, because it was 10000kms out of a fresh rebuild and they can fix the damn thing if its as bad as it sounds. the turbo only went when the car was switched off a couple of minutes after noticing smoke coming out of the bonnet and pulling over.

does that seem likely? it was still developing boost until i shut it down, but then when i started it next, no turbo!

worn (really f**ked up) valve guides will give you the same kind of symptoms.

if you want to check if its the head of pistons, try this:

hook up a hose with the same size fitting as the spark plug hole to it on one end, and a fitting for a compressor to the other.

connect it up and run the compressor and see where the air comes out of.

you'll need the piston to be at BDC all valves are closed (i think theyre closed at BDC, check your cam lobes as you spin the motor).

then sit and listen to where the air is coming out of.

if its your pistons it will probably blow out the dipstick, if its the head you will probably hear air hissing out of the head somewhere.

if you cant find one, i have that same size fitting for the spark plug hole somewhere from when i was doing my valve stem seals. let me know if you need to borrow it and we'll organise something.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...