Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If i use a RB25 turbo, does the dump have to be changed from my 25? Im asking a heap of questions i know, but i want to make sure i go the right way, and since i have quite a good dump pipe, dont want to get another one made which i will have to with a VG30 turbo. Also is the compressor outlet on the RB25 turbo the same size as the 20?

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nope... The RB25 turbo is a direct bolt on replacement, everything is the same to the RB20DET turbo.

The VG30 requires a little bit of modification to the turbo compressor outlet. As the VG30 one is larger than the RB20.

If you get a BB core VG30 which is around the $500 mark all the existing oil/water lines will bolt straight in.

hmm, think i know what im going to go towards.. as much as i would want more power.. How much more power could i squeeze from the VG over the 25 if they were both at the same level of tune?

Ultimatley i know i'll be dissapointed if it has poor throttle response, hense the VG wont keep me satisfied over the 25 :D

Ive got an RB25 turbo in my garage, looking at it your RB20 dump pipe will bolt up to it as they seem to have the same flange pattern.

I guess that makes sense as they are both generic T3 housings.

An RB20DET requires less air at any given RPM compared to a RB25 or VG30 at that same RPM.

Joel is that true, or is it an assumption. (Note for the senstive, this is not a challenge, just a question resulting from a geniune interest... so Joel, schools in and im listening)

The equation to work out CFM of an engine reqiures engine size, (ok that supports what you are saying) and also engine efficiency. Whether the engines have the same efficiency i have no idea.

It is true.. :D

This is why a larger capacity engine doesn't have to rev as hard to make the same power. I.e RB26 compared to a RB30.

The RB30 is using similiar amounts of air at 7000rpm to the RB26 at 8500rpm.

As mentioned earlier, its the luck of the draw.

If you get a good turbo it will last if you don't it could die on standard boost.

Also just as a note the VG30 turbo has a smaller compressor but larger exhaust compared to the RB25 turbo.

You could get really technical about the efficiency.

The RB25 head is known to flow better than the RB20 head so... theoretically that will allow more head room for more boost as there is more of a restriction to the airflow which in turn creates boost.

But really I think both are twin cam heads unless you are running up over 400hp where the RB20DET head starts to hit a brick wall, that is were the ability for air to flow in to the pots of the RB20DET will start to require more and more boost to get the same amount of air in with comparison to a more free flowing head (RB25).

Do a search plenty has been posted on this for a while.

I think Sydneykid made a good post also.

He also stated that the force (boost) on the exhaust/compressor wheels also pose a problem.

Just read the Performance forum posts, it still sounds like a game of paper, scissors, rock.

The theory sounds right, but its practical application may not be as pronounced as a snapshot of the theory would have you believe.

Luke if the VG30 needs mods to fit, id strick with the R33/34 turbos.

The variability of steel wheel/ceramic wheel, ball bearing/plain bearing VG30 turbos getting around, plus the age of the turbo all go against it.

Based on the experince of others with regards to lag and power the RB25 turbos sound the way to go. When its time to upgrade to your bigger turbo again, i think you will move the RB25 turbo a litle quicker as well.

Oh yeh sorry to throw another spanner in the works, i saw your post rebuying hte VG30 turbo.:D

If my boy Luke says he can run 50psi, then my boy can run 50psi. Or is that eggs?

Be sure to check with someone that knows RBs well. I think you will find that the RB20 isnt the best option head to be uing with RB30 bottom end.

The head stud diameters are different diamters and im not sure about the effect the smaller combustion chamber has on the larger bore/compression ratio

Originally posted by Bl4cK32

Yeah mate - not all of us have the supply of parts, and spend grands on tuning to squeeze out 250kw out of an rb20. How much money do you think it would cost to get 250 kw out of it -10g?

Now compare it to say an rb30 bottom end with a 25 head. Im told this engine produces the same output as the rb20det with no turbo. 10g compared to say 2g for a rebuilt motor package. Thats what I was trying to say.

Comments like this make me think how many idiots there are.

I got around 300kw;'s at the engine using a hi flow rb20 turbo front mount and a rechip. Gee how much did i spend. not even 2k so far.

Lets keep it civil guys

Ive seen in a dyno chart of an RB25/30 NA engine with i recall about 120rwkws. I suppose thats kinda RB20 turbo power.

My thoughts are that 250rwkws isnt all that difficult if you aleardy have say 200rwkws.

You already have ECU re-tuned, most likely a better fuelling system, full exhaust/filter, clutch blah blah blah. So other then bigger injectors it really comes down to turbo slection which is what Luke is asking.

RB30 NA's dont put out 120kw;s at wheels. I had one with a few mods was lucky to push out 98kw;'s at wheels.

Im not knocking the RB30DET as im building one myself , but you cant take away the power a rb20 can make with reasonably small mods.

u can make 300hp at wheels outta them with stock injectors , ECU , and AFM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...