Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If i use a RB25 turbo, does the dump have to be changed from my 25? Im asking a heap of questions i know, but i want to make sure i go the right way, and since i have quite a good dump pipe, dont want to get another one made which i will have to with a VG30 turbo. Also is the compressor outlet on the RB25 turbo the same size as the 20?

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nope... The RB25 turbo is a direct bolt on replacement, everything is the same to the RB20DET turbo.

The VG30 requires a little bit of modification to the turbo compressor outlet. As the VG30 one is larger than the RB20.

If you get a BB core VG30 which is around the $500 mark all the existing oil/water lines will bolt straight in.

hmm, think i know what im going to go towards.. as much as i would want more power.. How much more power could i squeeze from the VG over the 25 if they were both at the same level of tune?

Ultimatley i know i'll be dissapointed if it has poor throttle response, hense the VG wont keep me satisfied over the 25 :D

Ive got an RB25 turbo in my garage, looking at it your RB20 dump pipe will bolt up to it as they seem to have the same flange pattern.

I guess that makes sense as they are both generic T3 housings.

An RB20DET requires less air at any given RPM compared to a RB25 or VG30 at that same RPM.

Joel is that true, or is it an assumption. (Note for the senstive, this is not a challenge, just a question resulting from a geniune interest... so Joel, schools in and im listening)

The equation to work out CFM of an engine reqiures engine size, (ok that supports what you are saying) and also engine efficiency. Whether the engines have the same efficiency i have no idea.

It is true.. :D

This is why a larger capacity engine doesn't have to rev as hard to make the same power. I.e RB26 compared to a RB30.

The RB30 is using similiar amounts of air at 7000rpm to the RB26 at 8500rpm.

As mentioned earlier, its the luck of the draw.

If you get a good turbo it will last if you don't it could die on standard boost.

Also just as a note the VG30 turbo has a smaller compressor but larger exhaust compared to the RB25 turbo.

You could get really technical about the efficiency.

The RB25 head is known to flow better than the RB20 head so... theoretically that will allow more head room for more boost as there is more of a restriction to the airflow which in turn creates boost.

But really I think both are twin cam heads unless you are running up over 400hp where the RB20DET head starts to hit a brick wall, that is were the ability for air to flow in to the pots of the RB20DET will start to require more and more boost to get the same amount of air in with comparison to a more free flowing head (RB25).

Do a search plenty has been posted on this for a while.

I think Sydneykid made a good post also.

He also stated that the force (boost) on the exhaust/compressor wheels also pose a problem.

Just read the Performance forum posts, it still sounds like a game of paper, scissors, rock.

The theory sounds right, but its practical application may not be as pronounced as a snapshot of the theory would have you believe.

Luke if the VG30 needs mods to fit, id strick with the R33/34 turbos.

The variability of steel wheel/ceramic wheel, ball bearing/plain bearing VG30 turbos getting around, plus the age of the turbo all go against it.

Based on the experince of others with regards to lag and power the RB25 turbos sound the way to go. When its time to upgrade to your bigger turbo again, i think you will move the RB25 turbo a litle quicker as well.

Oh yeh sorry to throw another spanner in the works, i saw your post rebuying hte VG30 turbo.:D

If my boy Luke says he can run 50psi, then my boy can run 50psi. Or is that eggs?

Be sure to check with someone that knows RBs well. I think you will find that the RB20 isnt the best option head to be uing with RB30 bottom end.

The head stud diameters are different diamters and im not sure about the effect the smaller combustion chamber has on the larger bore/compression ratio

Originally posted by Bl4cK32

Yeah mate - not all of us have the supply of parts, and spend grands on tuning to squeeze out 250kw out of an rb20. How much money do you think it would cost to get 250 kw out of it -10g?

Now compare it to say an rb30 bottom end with a 25 head. Im told this engine produces the same output as the rb20det with no turbo. 10g compared to say 2g for a rebuilt motor package. Thats what I was trying to say.

Comments like this make me think how many idiots there are.

I got around 300kw;'s at the engine using a hi flow rb20 turbo front mount and a rechip. Gee how much did i spend. not even 2k so far.

Lets keep it civil guys

Ive seen in a dyno chart of an RB25/30 NA engine with i recall about 120rwkws. I suppose thats kinda RB20 turbo power.

My thoughts are that 250rwkws isnt all that difficult if you aleardy have say 200rwkws.

You already have ECU re-tuned, most likely a better fuelling system, full exhaust/filter, clutch blah blah blah. So other then bigger injectors it really comes down to turbo slection which is what Luke is asking.

RB30 NA's dont put out 120kw;s at wheels. I had one with a few mods was lucky to push out 98kw;'s at wheels.

Im not knocking the RB30DET as im building one myself , but you cant take away the power a rb20 can make with reasonably small mods.

u can make 300hp at wheels outta them with stock injectors , ECU , and AFM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...