Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys

I have just purchased and installed the famed GTRS and it has this loud whistling noise, when at idle and then reving the engine it will whistle through the air filter around 3000rpm onwards, but when you drive the car as you are accelerating it will produce the more whizzing sound (best described as similar to the engine noise sound you get through your speakers) does anyone else have the GTRS with a pod filter fitted that can tell me if theirs makes or doesn't make this noise or if it is normal.

i have tripple checked for air leaks, gasket leaks - and can gurantee it is not the fuel pump.

any help would be much appreciated

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/197148-hks-gtrs-whistle/
Share on other sites

Guest R34GTRGODZILLA

Yes i have a GTRS on my S2 Stagea auto, and when under way when i back off in say 2nd around town, (backing off only a little) and then holding the revs i find i can hold the whistle noise and can produce a rather loud whistle. But under full load it seems to be like any other turbo noise. Infact i reckon it is slightly quieter under load than the last turbo gcg that was on the car.

My HKS GT3037 makes a sweet high pitch whistle just like a jet engine starting up.

The old hybrid was more of a lower whoosh noise.

I will try and video it next time its on the RR from the front to see if I can catch the noise.

My HKS GT3037 makes a sweet high pitch whistle just like a jet engine starting up.

The old hybrid was more of a lower whoosh noise.

I will try and video it next time its on the RR from the front to see if I can catch the noise.

Yeah i might try to see if i can get the sound on camera as well,

I get the noise as soon i start accelerating.

Yeah i might try to see if i can get the sound on camera as well,

I get the noise as soon i start accelerating.

Its the anti-surge housing. My GT30R does it too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClXcNtAMJjg

Sounds just like mine mate. What was your boost and power?

Done 280rwkw on its last run on a hub dyno at 1bar of boost. Not too surprising it sounds just the same, its basically the same as an HKS GT3037 Pro S ;)

Edited by Lithium

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...