Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, before anyone asks, YES I have searched but all I can find about this is that when people ask this question they get flooded with replies of WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO DO THAT? and THE STOCK SETUP IS GOOD FOR xxxRWKW oh and RB20 WILL LOSE POWER WITH FORWARD FACING PLENUM.

None of that please.

All I am after is some examples and experiences with the various (limited) RB20 forward facing plenums out there and any solutions to the lack of options..

The reason I am after an RB20 forward facing plenum is due to the fact I have an RB25DE head on my 30..

SO, examples, experiences and opinions (opinions on particular RB20 forward facing plenums, not opinions on whether a 20 will lose power with one or not!).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/197302-rb20-forward-facing-plenum/
Share on other sites

funny you should bring this up but some time ago I was after one too, and I ran into all those arguments also.What people dont realise is that what happens on the dyno doesnt neccessarily happen on the street.I used to own an R32 GTS4 with aftermarket turbo.However RB20's are laggy.My theory was that putting the throttle body on the front in would allow the intercooler piping to be reduced by about a metre.So if you think about it thats one whole metre of pipe that doesnt need to be pressurised.So my theory was that response would pick up immensely,more noticable in the lower gears.First gear particularly.However as Dyno pulls are done in 4th Gear where lag and response isnt measured I felt I had a valid point.I have seen somebody who had the throttle body on the front edge of the factory manifold..( best of both worlds )..but I couldnt see that being cheap.

Anybody got any opinions ?

Yeah I'm not doing it for response reasons etc, it is purely a piping issue (twincam 30 in a 32 and putting a high mount 35r on) and having a nice flowing plenum will enable better gains in the future when I wind the boost right up :)

I won't be able to fit the high mount with my current piping arrangement and doing something like the 120deg inlet pipe is out of the question (already rubbing slightly on the timing belt cover so increased height there is a no-no).

A forward facing plenum would cure ALL of my pipework rubbing issues (it's even rubbing on the manifold slightly) and allow me room to high mount the 35R. A side benefit would be the reduced pipework and extra breathing capacity when I decide I want to push 400rwkw+ :)

However, I am very sceptical of the limited ebay items and while the plazmaman item seems to be a proven design, the $1k price tag would be eating into the budget somewhere :w00t:

Yeah I'm not doing it for response reasons etc, it is purely a piping issue (twincam 30 in a 32 and putting a high mount 35r on) and having a nice flowing plenum will enable better gains in the future when I wind the boost right up :)

I won't be able to fit the high mount with my current piping arrangement and doing something like the 120deg inlet pipe is out of the question (already rubbing slightly on the timing belt cover so increased height there is a no-no).

A forward facing plenum would cure ALL of my pipework rubbing issues (it's even rubbing on the manifold slightly) and allow me room to high mount the 35R. A side benefit would be the reduced pipework and extra breathing capacity when I decide I want to push 400rwkw+ :)

However, I am very sceptical of the limited ebay items and while the plazmaman item seems to be a proven design, the $1k price tag would be eating into the budget somewhere :w00t:

Here is my modded factory plenum modded to front facing. It is on a 25 not a 20 but you get the idea. Hasnt made a huge deal of difference to drivability. I would say a fraction more responsive than the stock setup. Pretty easy to do and not that expesive!

post-38773-1197430129_thumb.jpg

Looks good.. I've seen ALOT dodgeyer versions.. :w00t:

I think the arguements of making the stock one Front facing is the fact that it is internally designed to have air coming in from the middle of the plenum.

having the air come in from the end there throws it all out..

have a look on the inside of the plenum and you'll see the little fins..

How do your spark plugs look?

1 thru to 6?

anyway, you didn't want any arguements so I'll leave it there..

it works for you.. all good.

funny you should bring this up but some time ago I was after one too, and I ran into all those arguments also.What people dont realise is that what happens on the dyno doesnt neccessarily happen on the street.I used to own an R32 GTS4 with aftermarket turbo.However RB20's are laggy.My theory was that putting the throttle body on the front in would allow the intercooler piping to be reduced by about a metre.So if you think about it thats one whole metre of pipe that doesnt need to be pressurised.So my theory was that response would pick up immensely,more noticable in the lower gears.First gear particularly.However as Dyno pulls are done in 4th Gear where lag and response isnt measured I felt I had a valid point.I have seen somebody who had the throttle body on the front edge of the factory manifold..( best of both worlds )..but I couldnt see that being cheap.

Anybody got any opinions ?

you run into serious air distribution issues if you weld the throttle body to the front of a std manifold... we did the excersice 5-6 years ago on a flow bench and on a engine with 6 thermo couples... if you really must do at least change the whole top half.

Yeah I did mate, only problem is I have a 25DE head out of an R32.. same stud pattern as RB20. A 25DET plenum won't bolt up :D

It seems there are very limited solutions for RB20 style.. going to design my own in conjuction with another forum user and a couple of the mechanical engineers here at work. Afterall, that is what I do for a living.. (although I'm working in materials handling/mining & resources now as opposed to automotive R&D).

If I can come up with something that the engineers deem worthwhile, it should be able to be fabricated for half what a plazmaman plenum would cost and be a whole item instead of just the top half.

Definately still open to ideas though, proven real world experiences is where it's all at.. I'd rather use something that is proven than blow my engine up trying to develop my own :banana:

it is for an rb20, otherwise it would be on the r33 ;)

they are from the kiwi boys, and they get good results on stock motors. look up rotorua i think thats how its spelt

anyway its just sitting here. with piping and throttle cable and throttle body etc, everything really. but then i found it doesnt fit on rb25s due to the water lines etc beneath the plenum

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...