Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb20 Power Proplems


Recommended Posts

true, im still runnin the vl 5spd box n id say my ratios are quite a bit longer.....

They arent much different, its all in the diff gears, the the fact your speedo probably isnt that accurate either, most 20yr old speedo's are out substancially over 120km/h

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im really frusterated at the moment after spendin 5 grand on gettin the motor happin to do a 15.7,,,, head aches lol................ so wat should i do first???????????? i dont have tons of money so i can only do 1 thing at time thanxs scott

did any1 watch the drag video, do u think it sounds good???

There is a guy in Sydney who is running 12.8 i think with a std RB20, just with a 2nd hand HKS 2530. I have noticed VLs are typically quicker as there rear ends hook up better.

If you look through a search os some of the RB20 threads in Forced Induction section you will see the car i am referring to. I just cant remember the users forum name at the minute,.

I can understand your disappointment, but RB20s really arent much chop with std turbos. a 2871 or 2530 will work nicely. Also maybe consider an EMS or Microtech rather then Power FC, as Power FCs are rare and expensive. And woudl want to check that it will work with your modded loom first.

15.1 (think it was about 94mph) 2.something 60ft pod & cat-back

i was spewin cause i lost to my mates vlT and got into the whole suspension set ups with a mate who builds drag cars(not the vlT owner) he said id have to move my mounting points of my suspension to achieve a better launch,as std spec is more suited to cornering whereas the vl's suspension is better suited to straight line because of the angle the shocks and springs sit at.

i gave up on that,ill just get more power.

correct me if im wrong but ive been under the impression that auto's dont read accuratly up top?

would be interested to find out if its a myth or not.

HAHAHA i just noticed your quote under you sig Bubba,,,,nice;)

Guest trikdoutvl

god itd depressing 5g later for 134rwkw, i feel like puttin a gun to my head LOL o well as ned kelly said such is life lol

DiD any1 on here have there black r32 skyline at the motorplex a few weeks ago cause im curious if ya on these forums

id love to have 183rwkws... i noticed i think i got the only dyno sheet in hp... it would have felt way more depressing to see 134 pop up on the dyno reed out........

how much hp does a blocked cat cost ur car in power?? cause the cat was blocked at the time of dyno

Edited by trikdoutvl

dont ask me how,but some people have rb30's underneath their rb20 heads.

my tuner done 1 for a customer in his vl and it was getting good times.(cant remember exactly)

YES, i reckon a blocked cat would rob you of power,not sure exactly how much.

id get it dynoed again after you fix the cat problem.

Guest trikdoutvl

cat has been replaced now with a stainless steel hiflow but the cars still slow so caint of helped that much...

ill get it dyno wen i got computer n rb25 turbo that way hopefully have a nice increase

another mod i forgot to mention was a vl turbo fuel pump,, apperently there ment to be real good.....

i ment getting a rb30 motor instead of a rb20 fatazz lol not actually trying combine the 2 lol........ i used to have a 270bhp vlt rb30et, went hard as hell but the rb30s sound gay compaired to skyline motors IMO

RB30 + twin cam head + screaming to 7k causes the hairs to stand up on my kneck.

And to rub it in a little it makes 150rwkw at 3000rpm. :S

In all seriousness; if you want it to be reasonably quick with your setup (diff ratio etc) your going to have to drop an rb30 back in it.

Why not do the RB30 N/A turbo thing? They work well and if tuned make good solid reliable power.

Then a decent cam, valve springs and a larger huffer and flick it to 7k with the sohc head.

Guest trikdoutvl

nar man i wouldnt go back to a 30 now, ive done the big end bearings in 3 rb30 motor n dont even get me started on the tick tick of the lifters.......

rb25 turbo n a computer n all should be sweet....

on the plus side the car pulls really nice burnouts n listening to a rb20 humming 6000rpm doing burnout is like music to my ears lol..

i defenatley think i need computer.......... every1 says different things tho. some say safcs are good some say bad

  • 2 weeks later...

good for basic fuel and air mixtures to make more power. my r32 made 189hp with the safc2 there untuned with all the normal bolt on mods. but tuned made it to 211hp(157.5kw). i was happy with the 22hp gain from it and its also a lot smoother drive

SAFC purchase = $200 (first of the blue screen ones)

Install = $50 (if you can't follow directions and solder 5 or 6 wires)

tune = $200 ( to make changes to 8 fuel points)

Stock ECU remap = $300

it has ALOT more points at which to make changes to Fuel.

it has ALOT more points at which to make changes to Timing.

it does NOT require soldering anything.

It does not trick the signal sent from the AFM to the ECU to make the changes.

It is all factory standard looking.

there are a number of GTR's in Japan that run 9's and use stock ECU with a remap.

SAFC purchase = $200 (first of the blue screen ones)

Install = $50 (if you can't follow directions and solder 5 or 6 wires)

tune = $200 ( to make changes to 8 fuel points)

Stock ECU remap = $300

it has ALOT more points at which to make changes to Fuel.

it has ALOT more points at which to make changes to Timing.

it does NOT require soldering anything.

It does not trick the signal sent from the AFM to the ECU to make the changes.

It is all factory standard looking.

there are a number of GTR's in Japan that run 9's and use stock ECU with a remap.

where can you get a remap for $300? isn't it more like $700? the first time you get it done you need to put a chip into the ecu....

Guest trikdoutvl

cool yeh im gonna get the standard computer retuned,, i found a place in perth that does it, soo hopefully will have a tune in the next few months once the shop as a dyno....

so after market computer aint really worth it unless i got bigger turbo n injectors n all that stuff

SAFC purchase = $200 (first of the blue screen ones)

Install = $50 (if you can't follow directions and solder 5 or 6 wires)

tune = $200 ( to make changes to 8 fuel points)

Stock ECU remap = $300

it has ALOT more points at which to make changes to Fuel.

it has ALOT more points at which to make changes to Timing.

it does NOT require soldering anything.

It does not trick the signal sent from the AFM to the ECU to make the changes.

It is all factory standard looking.

there are a number of GTR's in Japan that run 9's and use stock ECU with a remap.

$300? in Sydney? :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • 310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
×
×
  • Create New...