Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ah Brisby...You save so much of my time with your posts :thumbsup:

Racing 750hp, 600kg cars in the wet is downright dangerous. It's called motor sport princess.

Yeah, If Raikkonen pulled in behind Kubica, your mate Hamilton more than likely would've taken them both out. If he can't see 2 flashing red lights and 2 cars PARKED side by side waiting for them to go green, what chance does he have of seeing 2 flashing red lights and the rear end of only 1 car parked in front of him...

Alright, while you and Roy get your jiggie on,

I never said racing wasnt dangerous. Raikkonnen the WDC was.

Cold tyres, out of a dry tunnel and onto a damp track and Wham, two cars taken out - at what he admited to being 200mph.

Brain fade from both drivers as far as i can tell.

Or dont you think so, "princess"?

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Was also over the crest that caused Coulthard to lose it the day before....Maybe they should've penalized DC for endangering his own life...

A driver putting himself at risk and a driver involving an innocent are two completely different things.

A driver putting himself at risk and a driver involving an innocent are two completely different things.

You have got to be kidding me. Well, you're kidding yourself.

ITS A RACE!

What don't you understand? Should every driver that crashes be penalised for endangering the lives of drivers, spectators and marshalls?

Stop trying to argue something that is making you look foolish.

You have got to be kidding me. Well, you're kidding yourself.

ITS A RACE!

What don't you understand? Should every driver that crashes be penalised for endangering the lives of drivers, spectators and marshalls?

Stop trying to argue something that is making you look foolish.

Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

Oh my, someones losing any/all credibility...

The pit lane exit was closed and the safety car was on track.

There are rules that need to be followed when racing. Kubica, Raikkonen (both in Monaco and Canada) and Coulthard (Monaco) obeyed them.

Actually,

You know what. I just looked at the incident again and i cant believe how dumb that make Hamfist look.

Such a stupid error... probably the dumbest of the year.

I dont know how he couldnt see the red light... Ironically, it went green a split second after Hammo took out KR...

and Kube was like "Yoink - ill take that win thank you very much."

From what I know (and it aint much), pit lane isn't considered part of the track.

And look, if the muppet can't see the cars, the lights and can't hear his boss telling him to take care then.....well.....can't say much more really.

Hamilton.......massive fail!

Oh my, someones losing any/all credibility...

The pit lane exit was closed and the safety car was on track.

There are rules that need to be followed when racing. Kubica, Raikkonen (both in Monaco and Canada) and Coulthard (Monaco) obeyed them.

Dude chillax on the "Ive got to make my point and have the final say".

Credibility is overrated especially when we are armchair expert keyboard sunday warriors, lol

I was commenting on your "Its a race" comment.

No doubt it was a stupid error but i still think KR should have been penalised for his brain fade in Monaco because thats EXACTLY what it was to me.

A brain fade - either that or the "red mist" descended... equally as bad.

Frustrated with life because you cant get past a F.I much?

Monty at Montreal in 2005 anyone?

Edited by m3gtr

Actually, while we are at it, lets penalize all the groundhogs that appear at Montreal - those lil bastards

'specially the one that robbed Ant last year.

Edited by m3gtr
Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

No difference at all. In both instances you race to within the rules. On the track you obey the flags, in the pits you obey the lights, pit speed etc. He didnt heed the red lights. Just like if he overtook Kubica whilst there was a safety car on the track. Or hit him whilst behind the safety car. You can do it, the fact that he hit another car when not stopping for the red light is the stooopid part of it.

And again for those crying FIA foul. What happened to Vettel when he rocked up to China last year? He copped a 10 place penalty. But wait, guess what? It was overturned when evidence came to light that Lewis's frequent baulking behind the pace car was a controbuting factor so was let off. LOL, so they let off Vettel because Lewis was partly to blame. They didnt can him then, which woudl have been a tough call. This time round its perfectly fair that he cops the penalty, its warranted

yer, It was a move warranting a penalty but i cant believe how many people on here are defending KR and saying his move didnt!!

Thats biased.

I just want to also say that Massas move on HK and RB at the hairpin was stupidly wicked.

Edited by m3gtr
No doubt it was a stupid error but i still think KR should have been penalised for his brain fade in Monaco because thats EXACTLY what it was to me.

A brain fade - either that or the "red mist" descended... equally as bad.

But how many races has DC won? He isnt a hack. He is past his best, but he is still very talented guy, so when all by himself, in the dry he binned his car on the same corner. So fast forward 24 hours and in a wet race in traffic on tyres that are still comign up to temperature, he made a woopsie and hit another competitor. He went and saw Sutil after the race and apolgised. The way i see it he did a marvelous job of controlling it. He could have very easily made an even bigger mess of it and had the race red flagged.

Anyway, all this is taking away from a hige effort by BMW and Kubica. But the real story is how selfless Nicj Heidfeld was. If he raced his team mate like any other competitor it would have been his race because he had the right strategy at the right time, LOL and didnt need to hti a wall to fluke onto the right strategy :thumbsup:

yer, It was a move warranting a penalty but i cant believe how many people on here are defending KR and saying his move didnt!!

Thats biased.

WHAT MOVE?

He locked up the brakes, and spun out at the fastest part of the circuit. How is that a move? How can you even begin to imagine that being penalized?

How can you say something so ridiculous, whilst in the same sentence call anyone biased?

WHAT MOVE?

He locked up the brakes, and spun out at the fastest part of the circuit. How is that a move? How can you even begin to imagine that being penalized?

How can you say something so ridiculous, whilst in the same sentence call anyone biased?

I was supposed to type "mistake"

Chill out Dezz - Its not the end of the world.

Edited by m3gtr

Cracker of a race though, pity Webber wasn't up there. Makes me wonder if he didn't bin it at the end of Q2, probably wouldn't have been in all the traffic as he was showing some pace, but ohwell.

Massa's beginning to prove a few people wrong, had quite a few passes and in trying conditions, is good to see.

Edited by salad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...