Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

recently after i replaced my steering rack and steering pump for rb20det on my gts, i realised da first time i kick start da car, white smoke came out. that was den.

now, every monring when i start da car, no white smoke, and check engine light. once i start drive da car, da check engine comes on. when dis happens, i found dat my low rev kinda stutters. im using iridium plugs no8, replaced all da coil plugs alr.

i've even diagnosed da car, from da ecu and an external diagnostic tool. which found no error, even wif my check engine light's on.

anyone ere noes wat shud i look for? shud i replace my afm? if its my turbo thats need a replacement, wud i b able to boost it up still if i rev hard? coz i did try yesterday, i rev'd it realli hard, n it boosted up to 0.9 bar. which is full boost and found da car still pulling. n when i parked my car, it releases heaps of white smoke.

any idea where shud i start? i also realised that my exhaust sensor mounting was burnt, but still useable. i cud still unclip and clip it back.

ANY IDEA? PLS HELP

wat im tryin to say is....

white smoke emits out from my exhaust. while im driving it, sometimes the cehck light engine comes on n off. i'd used da diagnostic tools n used the ecu to diagnose to check which sensor spoiled. but it came out all healthy.

thus what im tryin to ask is, what else shud i look for? could it be the valve seal causing white smoke? as for my turbo, there are some minor oil at the downpipe and the front mouth of my turbo.

as for compression, its all at 120-130 reading for all 6 cyclinders. so it couldnt b my piston rings, am i correct?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...