Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

jack3d pre-workout - though easing up on this lately it doesn't seem to have anywhere near the same effect it did the first/second months of usage. and i hate the taste.

I remember my first time I tried Jack3d, was scratching at my skin like a crack addict because my skin was tingling and got the jitters lol.

Just out of interest, how far over do you bend for barbell rows? Go for this imo, I love them:

Pretty much try to get parallel with the floor, I see people doing them at 45 all the time and they are sorta missing the point lol

jack3d pre-workout - though easing up on this lately it doesn't seem to have anywhere near the same effect it did the first/second months of usage. and i hate the taste.

I find if i take a break from it for a couple of weeks it is much more powerful rather than taking it before every workout. Definitely on the hunt for a new pre-workout though and have heard good things about 1MR, anyone have any feedback on it?

they're intended to be done parallel to the floor but that doesn't mean you can't vary it from time to time and do it at a 45° angle... it just hits higher up your back instead of the lats etc... just like changing from a pronated grip to supinated will vary it as well

best when held at the top a little, really squeezing your shoulder blades together

I find if i take a break from it for a couple of weeks it is much more powerful rather than taking it before every workout. Definitely on the hunt for a new pre-workout though and have heard good things about 1MR, anyone have any feedback on it?

I use 1MR from time to time and it works pretty good for me. Taste good, doesn't have 1,3 Dimeth like Jack3d which I've read causes some bad side effects.

Righto been doin a fair bit of thinking and reading and I've decided to change up the routine a bit

OLD ROUTINE

Monday

Chest/tris

Tuesday

Legs/abs

Wednesday

Upper back/bis

Thursday

Shoulders/abs

Friday

Deadlift session

NEW ROUTINE

Monday

Chest/tris

Tuesday

Legs/shoulders

Wednesday

Upper back/bis

Then repeat though on the second cycle I'll do a deadlift session..

So I'll be doing each muscle group twice a week though the amont of time spent on each muscle group in each session has been reduced

Essentially Shorter sessions more often stop needless over training and allow 3-4 days rest before getting back into it as appose to 5-6

I will still be doing the major exercises in both sessions though I'll will vary it so it's different ie

Chest

Day 1 barbell presses

Day 2 dumbbell presses

Back

Day 1 bentover barbell rows

Day 2 bent over t bar rows

I've also come to the conclusion that while Im tryin to bulk up my abs are goin to show up much anyway do I've cut the ab shit away

What do u guys reckon?

Appreciate input

Cheers

Righto scrap this, after some further research I'll be changing the routine again

Main changes will be:

Max 3 days of straight training then have a rest day

Changing to chest/bis and upperback/tris

Splitimg the routine so a secondary muscle that has been used in a work out gets at least 48 rest before being hit as a primary ie 48hours between a chest and shoulder session

Also will be goin by feel for when I start the training cycle again as appose to 1 cycle each week

Edited by GTR_JOEY

Ever considered a two day split repeated in the week? It's a lot of exercises to fit into two days, but three days off gives you some nice rest or cardio days.

I use 1MR from time to time and it works pretty good for me. Taste good, doesn't have 1,3 Dimeth like Jack3d which I've read causes some bad side effects.

It used to have it. I suppose without it, it's nothing more than a shitload of caffeine

Ever considered a two day split repeated in the week? It's a lot of exercises to fit into two days, but three days off gives you some nice rest or cardio days.

I have but my sessions would go for far too long and I just don't think I could have that many days off a week away from the gym...

Been doing a fair bit of reading and according to more then a couple of articles the best way for training to build bulk and muscle is to train once a week on each muscle group and really give them a smashing as appose to twice a week with less sets.

They also say that twice a week with less sets it's better for beginners while once a week with more sets is for more experienced body builders

They have their theories for saying this I can find the articles if anyone wants to read them

I agree with them that hitting each group once a week properly (as in, hard and heavy) is better than doing it twice a week with less sets. Without even seeing the theories behind it, I'd have my own about the muscles being broken down better by the former.

Number of sets does need to be defined though, because, for example, I do the two day split with a repeat later in the week, however, each exercise I do has about 6 sets to it and I certainly don't leave feeling like I could have done a lot more. It's sort of that...once a week thing...but repeated? Could be considered overtraining, but I heal pretty quickly and rarely feel like the workouts interfere with each other. I mean there's nothing I could do at the gym, short of causing myself a joint injury lol, that would require a week before I could safely work the muscle group again.

Na haven't heard of under tension mate....? I generally aim for 1 and a half minutes between sets, though I'm pretty social at the gym so doesn't always happen like that lol

In reguards to amont of sets for each muscle group, the general belief for once a week would be around 16 sets

For twice a week approx 8 sets

I agree that once a week is plenty of time to rest a muscle group after a hard session 4-5 days would be optimum in my opinion

I do the same workout on Thursday as I do on Monday, and Friday as I do on Tuesday. Even though it's a split routine, there's a small amount of crossover with muscle groups so Wednesday is the day of no gym = a thorough rest day. The only time I'll feel any sort of soreness or interference is if I miss a couple of days at the gym and then the next workout will take a little longer to recover from.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
×
×
  • Create New...