Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Three rules:

1. Muscles will only grow in size with more food. Now here's where it gets tricky: it can be, all other variables held constant, easier for fat people (who are probably consuming more protein and calories on the whole) to gain muscle size than skinnies, who are usually at or below maintenance and don't know the meaning of the phrase "lots of food". So body fat, to a degree, can make a difference simply because of your eating habits.

2. Putting on size with strength is, to a degree, inevitable. You can't be squatting 220kg and not have a decent set of quads to back it up. You can't be benching 150kg and not have some mean triceps. So get used to the idea that, if you want to be this strong: There is only so much a muscle can change about it's structure before it needs more size to keep up with the increasing workload. There are only so many calories your muscles can thrive off before they need more energy to push through a strength plateau. Strength gains are possible without, but difficult when maintaining the same protein and food intake (again, depends on your current diet, as per rule 1).

3. Training in certain set and rep ranges can have an impact on size and strength; hypertrophy versus strength training. There is plenty of consensus that high set, high rep workouts (along with eating lots of food) are the size builders and low set, low rep workouts are focused on strength. If you're aiming for the strength with as little size as possible, you want a powerlifting routine. Why? Look at some of the competing lifters Markos posts...now some of them a quite big, as per the second rule...but it is in these guys' interests to turn up to a competition as strong as possible, whilst staying within their designated weight class. They don't want a lot of hypertrophy, because the extra size will have them competing unnecessarily against stronger guys in the next weight class.

Ergo, Dan, if you want strength with as little muscle size as possible, I would eat a healthy diet at maintenance or cutting level, stick to training in the ranges that target strength, and learn to deal with the fact that you will either be slogging away damn hard to make small gains over long periods of time, or eating some more food and gaining some size to break through strength plateaus easier. Personally, I would just eat...if Kate doesn't like your newfound size, it's not impossible to scale back and lose muscle. I've lost a lot of upper body size over the 4-5 months I haven't done upper body training. I've retained 85-90% of my strength, but the size has sunk (I train in hypertrophy set/rep ranges, but limit growth with food = low body fat despite a not so fantastic, carb heavy diet).

I find some of this stuff really contradictory at times, not pointing the finger at your Birds. Maybe for me it's more food related.

I've found that lighter weight and more reps leans me off a bit and tones me up, heavier weights and lower reps bulks me up a bit and tends to see me look larger. Intermediate weight but lots of reps and sets sees me getting bigger again.

I'll just have a play around with a few things and see what happens, I wouldn't mind dropping a 1kg or two.

Yeah fair enough, as above will try and few things and see what happens.

As I mentioned, I'm a lighter build guy and my body would happily sit in the high 70s with no exercise so to be in the high 80s is over 10% more than what might be "normal" for me.

I'm on the edge at the moment where I still get quality time, but there are comments that come along with that about being too bulky, again her view not mine but I value it because she values mine with her appearance.

Yeah fair enough, as above will try and few things and see what happens.

As I mentioned, I'm a lighter build guy and my body would happily sit in the high 70s with no exercise so to be in the high 80s is over 10% more than what might be "normal" for me.

I'm on the edge at the moment where I still get quality time, but there are comments that come along with that about being too bulky, again her view not mine but I value it because she values mine with her appearance.

do you feel you have 10kg more muscle by doing weights?

God no, I'm sure there's a healthy element of fatness in there too. Something else that needs to be controlled.

Looking at 78kg photos of me though most of the size increase in my shoulders/chest and butt. Seems to be where I show any changes first.

Again, not really he point though, the question was about how I get what I want. Not I'm awesome and have put on 10kg of pure awesomesauce muscle mass - which I haven't. Just giving basis for comparison/context.

Which others have had a crack at answer, so thanks :)



Edited by ActionDan

I find some of this stuff really contradictory at times, not pointing the finger at your Birds. Maybe for me it's more food related.

I've found that lighter weight and more reps leans me off a bit and tones me up, heavier weights and lower reps bulks me up a bit and tends to see me look larger. Intermediate weight but lots of reps and sets sees me getting bigger again.

I'll just have a play around with a few things and see what happens, I wouldn't mind dropping a 1kg or two.

There is no such thing as toning up. Muscle tone is not under voluntary control, it is pre determined by higher brains centres and relies heavily on reflexive muscle spindle feedback to be kept in range.

You either get more definition due to a drop in bf% or your muscles have grown.

*sigh* I'll be more specific for you then.

"I've found that lighter weight and more reps leans me off a bit and tones me up in terms of how I look. Due to a drop in bodyfat percentage and/or an increase in muscle size"

Why? In the context of what I want, how is that relevant?

Genuine question.

I'm happy sharing almost any detail, but not of it's going to fuel some rant that's not helpful to my question.

I do not mean that offensively .

Edited by ActionDan

Mitch :

Fair enough.

When I was younger and trying to be a hero wearing tight shirts and eating everything I went from 65 or so to 93 or so KG, of course it was not all muscle but it was mass and that's what I wanted. I was only doing 3x10 at 100kg on the bench and was curling like a mad kent, doing 99% upper body work 3 times a week, didn't know what a squat/DL was, all I did leg wise was light lunges and running. That was in my early 20s.

I ended up with some typical curl bro injuries and got out of gym stuff for a good 2 years and tended to all my bro injuries. Around Feb of last year I got back into some light weights and on MArch posted a build thread about trying to get some balance in a home routine, realised I'd been missing out on all the good compound exercises, started some of those. Broke my leg and dislocated my ankle in October of last year not long after buying a squat rack. Since then have nee doing physio/rehab etc to try and get my legs and pelvis working properly.

Upper body stuff still goes OK, legs are very weak and need a lot of work, that is, 100kg squats are serious work for me, no shame in saying that as I was a prolific squat dodger, but trying to learn how to squat well on odd mechanics due to those injuries is taking some time and causing strains here and there. Not strong by any stretch in the upper body either, but it goes better than lower and I tend to see results reasonable well at least in my head. ATM I can do at least 8 reps at 116kg on the bench, maybe 9-10 come Monday if Rev's training method is teaching me anything at all - then did another 10x1 reps on the last session (Marko said that by the time his guess bench 100 they are squatting and DL'ing a ton more than that, I'm backwards). Can do 25-30kg weighted chins something like 8x8x6 or ther abouts. Did 16 pull ups without having tried them before then moved on to some weighted chins for the challenge thread, and can usually do 3x8 around 35kg on the weighted dips, getting close to 3x5's at 40kg. So as I said, not strong in any way on any motion but doing some gym means I've gotten larger in the upper body.

I was also running about 80-100k a month before breaking my leg, not fast, just 3-4k's everyday, for general fitness and the dog.

Rev: That's kind of the goal, I'll drop some bf when I can get back into running, and that might be enough to offset any small gain I get trying to get my legs stronger. As I'd like to at least be able to rep 20 squats at 100 or something, which should be easy but would be a nightmare for me. Prior to hammy issue I was at least doing a few reps at 100 on the squat and about 110 on the DL (which I find easier due to less requirement for ankle ROM).

God no, I'm sure there's a healthy element of fatness in there too. Something else that needs to be controlled.

Looking at 78kg photos of me though most of the size increase in my shoulders/chest and butt. Seems to be where I show any changes first.

Again, not really he point though, the question was about how I get what I want. Not I'm awesome and have put on 10kg of pure awesomesauce muscle mass - which I haven't. Just giving basis for comparison/context.

Which others have had a crack at answer, so thanks :)

I think your size is diet related, I also don't think you eat enough for what your size is though.

But you aren't willing to change the one thing that can help you get your goals most.

I think maybe your hobby should be your diet and your occasional consideration should be weights?

Admittedly not paying enough attention today, busy, but I think I get it.

Diet more important than rep scheme.

and the whole adaption thing that's been explained before. it goes both ways. You and I about the same height, you exercise more often, I eat more to maintain a lighter weight.

And no, its not a fast metabolism, I built it up.

So when I choose to cut, I will still be eating around 2500kCal a day.

Same explanation as the 93kg friend of mine example.

He is 92kg eating 1000kCal a day more. Exercise is the same.

Dan I never said anything about dropping the weight as the sets and reps go up to train for hypertrophy. Hypertrophy still requires heavy weight...you can't be pressing 50kg for 10 sets of 50 reps and expect to look huge. Look at how much the IFBB dudes are lifting...the major difference is that they spend 4-5 hours (probably more) in the gym every day, training high volume and isolating every single muscle in their body...they are certainly strong, but they're not training with outrighy strength in mind. Plus they eat absolutely f**kloads of food.

The reason that would make you look smaller is because you are doing volume training which burns a lot of calories, and you are doing a light weight which the muscle does not need to be big to lift.

Now if we keep that in mind, and you instead want to be strong and small...you would look towards the opposite of volume training and isolation movements. This means the major compounds, low set, low reps, heavy weight, maintenance diet...you will be as strong as you can and as small as you can be because you are limiting growth (and strength to a degree) with diet and training in a rep range that supports strength more than muscle size.

Remember, the gym gives your muscles a reason to grow, food gives it the building blocks to do it. You can change variables at either end fairly easily to affect the outcome. I already told you earlier exactly how to achieve what you want, i.e. maximum strength minimum size.

Food for thought....... Get it..... Yeah I'm here all week ;)

Jangles: so you much weigh less at the same height and are much stronger? Awesome job dude :) always good to see results for people who are dedicated.

Bird man: Hmm ok. I kind of like low rep scheme purely from a time point of view, but I must eat too much when I do that as I've tended to gain during those phases.

Certainly seems like diet is a big key I'm not paying enoug attention too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...