Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Pretty soon ill be purchasing a GT series Garrett turbo for a conversion im doing. However when speaking to people in regards to turbo choice, some have referred to the GT28R as either a GT2860R or GT2560R. Now on the Garrett site, it shows them as different turbos :)

Which is the GT28R?

Also, what do the end numbers refer to in the part number?

GT2560R - 466541-1 <----

GT2560R - 466541-4 <----

GT2560R - 707160-9 <----

GT2860R - 707160-5 <----

GT2860R - 707160-7 <----

Regards,

Sarkis

those numbers are for the different versions of the same turbos meaning different A/R and trim sizes

For example the the -7 can be used as a direct replacement for GTR and each turbo supports around 300hp, whereas the -5 is slightly bigger and will support something like 350hp

does that make sense?

The terminology stems from the pre ball bearing turbos like T2's and T25's and T28's .

It was sort of hard in the BB era because early on they were mostly called GT25XXR turbos ie GT2530R or GT2540R etc .

The small BB centre section is also commonly known as the GT25 BB centre section .

Most of Garretts turbo families are based on their turbine series (by name) , from what I've seen Garrett developed the T2 series which later grew slightly larger diametre turbines and compressors (T25) and larger pairs again for the T28's .

They went this way to make more compact/lighter turbos than the T3 series .

You could look at a T28 as a turbo with larger diameter wheels than a T25 and a good example of this is the GTiR's turbo .

When Garrett started making the BB version of the basic T2 centre section they used what looks like a BB shaft version of the basic 11 bladed T25 turbine and either 54 or 60mm diametre compressors on the other end .

They also developed the high performance 54mm NS111 turbine and used these with 60mm compressors in turbos like the GT2530 . As time went by Garrett decided to call this turbine and 60mm compressor combination "GT2860R" or "GT2860RS" in one case because the RS ment BB modified or altered spec in that case .

Really the names or descriptions are all over the place , you really need to know which turbine and compressor spec combinations you want to use and then hunt up the part number . This is not as hard as it may sound , aside from a TT engine like an RB26 that may need super responsive turbos I think the high performance NS111 turbine is way to go . It has less blades and is of a more open paddle bladed design with high inducer tips . Its what you get in GT2530/GT2860RS/GT2871R . HKS's GT-RS is just anothe name for a housing change on a GT2871R 52 comp trim cartridge .

All this aside you need to work out which flange size the turbine housing has because most are T2/25/28 (same) and a small number from HKS have the T3 mount flange size which you would need for an RB20/25 .

Off the shelf a GT2530 or a GT-RS (2871R 52T) are practical things on RB25's depending on what power/response you want .

Its a shame Garrett didn't make T3 flanged turbine housings for this series because it would make life a lot easier for those needing GT25/28 turbos for Skylines . HKS saw a market and catered for it .

Cheers A .

Slightly off topic but does anybody know who sells 'bolt on' garret ball bearing series turbo kits for rb20?? Or is it only GCG and Hp in a box?? I would prefer a melbourne distributor so at least if im paying top dollar i can have some after sale service.

There seems to be a big price descepency between aussie distributors and buying off ebay direct from the states. I don't trust ebay for stuff like that, has anybody bought a disco or 2871R that bolts straight on to a RB20 this way??

Thanks for the Info Discopotato...

Well maybe you can help me in selecting the best suited turbo. I am doing a turbo conversion on a Nissan Pulsar N16 with the QG18DE (1.8L) engine.

Im after a zippy turbo (ball bearing of coarse) that will give decent top end power without chocking.

Engine Specs

Engine name : QG18DE

Valves per Cylinder : 4

Cam Configuration : DOHC

Displacement (cc) : 1769

Compression Ratio : 9.5:1

Bore / Stroke (mm) : 80 / 88

Number of Cylinders : 4

Cylinder Configuration : Inline

cast iron engine block

Aluminum Heads

Variable Valve Timing

MPI fuel injection

# Power - 126 hp (94 kW) @ 6000 rpm

# Torque - 129 lbf.ft (174 nm) @ 2400 rpm

# Redline - 6500 rpm

Power Goal: 160 - 170atw/kw

Boost: 10psi max

Full boost: 3000 - 3500RPM

I am considering either the GT2860R (GT28R) or GT28RS both with the .64 Ex housing for faster spool on a 1.8

Thanks guys

Ok for a 1.8L, 4 cylinder around 180-200rwkw id go for an HKSgt2510, dont think you could do better...

Specs here:

HKS GT2510 - 300 PS Output

COMPRESSOR:

-Wheel- 63 Trim - 47.7 Inducer / 60.1 Major

-Housing- 60 Inlet / 50 Outlet - 0.60 A/R

TURBINE:

-Wheel- 62 Trim - 53.0 Major / 41.7 Exducer

-Housing- GT25 inlet / Internal GT25 oulet - 0.64 A/R

Edited by FOOLBOOST
The terminology stems from the pre ball bearing turbos like T2's and T25's and T28's .

It was sort of hard in the BB era because early on they were mostly called GT25XXR turbos ie GT2530R or GT2540R etc .

The small BB centre section is also commonly known as the GT25 BB centre section .

Most of Garretts turbo families are based on their turbine series (by name) , from what I've seen Garrett developed the T2 series which later grew slightly larger diametre turbines and compressors (T25) and larger pairs again for the T28's .

They went this way to make more compact/lighter turbos than the T3 series .

You could look at a T28 as a turbo with larger diameter wheels than a T25 and a good example of this is the GTiR's turbo .

When Garrett started making the BB version of the basic T2 centre section they used what looks like a BB shaft version of the basic 11 bladed T25 turbine and either 54 or 60mm diametre compressors on the other end .

They also developed the high performance 54mm NS111 turbine and used these with 60mm compressors in turbos like the GT2530 . As time went by Garrett decided to call this turbine and 60mm compressor combination "GT2860R" or "GT2860RS" in one case because the RS ment BB modified or altered spec in that case .

Really the names or descriptions are all over the place , you really need to know which turbine and compressor spec combinations you want to use and then hunt up the part number . This is not as hard as it may sound , aside from a TT engine like an RB26 that may need super responsive turbos I think the high performance NS111 turbine is way to go . It has less blades and is of a more open paddle bladed design with high inducer tips . Its what you get in GT2530/GT2860RS/GT2871R . HKS's GT-RS is just anothe name for a housing change on a GT2871R 52 comp trim cartridge .

All this aside you need to work out which flange size the turbine housing has because most are T2/25/28 (same) and a small number from HKS have the T3 mount flange size which you would need for an RB20/25 .

Off the shelf a GT2530 or a GT-RS (2871R 52T) are practical things on RB25's depending on what power/response you want .

Its a shame Garrett didn't make T3 flanged turbine housings for this series because it would make life a lot easier for those needing GT25/28 turbos for Skylines . HKS saw a market and catered for it .

Cheers A .

Disco,

very informative as always.

i have a question, to overcome the T3 flange issue with the Garrett GT25xx BB turbos, what are your thoughts of using the RB25 turbine housing with cartridges such as the GT2860R or GT2871R (48-52T)??

do u think this is a worthwhile option to look at for a street car?

cheers,

GT

First things first , I'm not sure if Nissan had a turbo version of that engine actually I think not .

If it were me I'd think strongly about the GT2860RS or DP turbo for the following reasons .

Firstly its a high compression NA engine so it it should make reasonable torque at very low revs and not need boost right down low . Secondly IF you want to have a fighting chance of beating detonation you NEED low exhaust restriction at the bottom end of the usable rev range where you would expect to have a high CR turbo converted engine knock .

Thirdly Id only use the larger 0.86 A/R turbine housing which this turbo was expressly designed to work properly with .

Since you will probably have to have an exhaust manifold fabricated you get to choose which turbo mount flange it has .

Its been quite a while since I've been there but you should find lots of info at American sites like SE/R Forums - Sentra SE/R's being their equivalent of our Nissan Pulsar SSS's . They were playing with hotted up and turbo versions of the QR25DE (I think its called QR25 ?) which is the 2.4L four they get in the I think N16 Sentra/Pulsar . I think we got that engine in the Nissan softonroader 4WD thing - name escapes me ATM .

I probably shouldn't ask but whats the plan with engine management ? Had the car been an N15 I would have suggested a CA18DET or GA16DE turbo conversion which I think the Americans do .

Also should probably do a search on Jim Wolf Technology (JWT) as they do cams and computer mods for some of those front drive Nissans .

Lastly the bit you won't want to hear .

I would not go down this road with an N16 Pulsar because of what they cost and how much money needs to be spent to do it properly . Front wheel drive turbo cars are an abonimation IMO because when the torque rises rapidly they wheelspin and torque steer when you least need it - like entering a bend with a B Double truck going the other way . In the wet they are lethal because you have no way of knowing if its going to go where you "aim" it . I think if the all mighty intended front wheel drive cars to have turbo torque he would have backed it up with rear wheel drive - AWD .

Even then a huge amount of development has been undertaken since cars like the Jenson FF 4WD and the all conquering (in its day on the dirt) Audi Quatro first turned a wheel .

I think your going to find that Pulsars have fairly basic suspension and brakes and they won't cope too well . If you really want a turbo performance car I think you need to start with something a bit more appropriate .

Sorry if I'm bursting you bubble but on the flip side I may be saving you a lot of money .

Your money your call , cheers Adrian .

I appreciate all your advice Adrian, and by all means i do agree with you. However i was a proud owner of a Series II R33 GTST with sufficient mods and now since owning my N16 i have LOVED the car however all it lacks is some power. Thats the main reason of the turbo conversion. Im not trying to build the fastest FWD, just wanting to have some nice pull from car thats all. many N16 owners from PGA have built low - mid 13sec daily drivers with standard internals.

I will be using a Haltech Interceptor Piggy Back or might even result to an Apexi AFC Neo.

I have sourced a practically brand new reco. T25G for $350 i may even end up buying and using that which will provide plenty of power to get my car going. I just thought that its probably better to invest into a BB turbo and have a faster spool.

Cheers

Slightly off topic but does anybody know who sells 'bolt on' garret ball bearing series turbo kits for rb20?? Or is it only GCG and Hp in a box?? I would prefer a melbourne distributor so at least if im paying top dollar i can have some after sale service.

There seems to be a big price descepency between aussie distributors and buying off ebay direct from the states. I don't trust ebay for stuff like that, has anybody bought a disco or 2871R that bolts straight on to a RB20 this way??

call Eastern Turbochargers, they can sort it out...

I have a GT2560R aka GT2860R on my Sr20det n15 pulsar. It is very responsive and will net you 200+ kwatw. most guys on pga use these, GT2871R, GT2860RS or hks 2540.

They may have alot of wheelspin but they are dam fun to drive.

I appreciate all your advice Adrian, and by all means i do agree with you. However i was a proud owner of a Series II R33 GTST with sufficient mods and now since owning my N16 i have LOVED the car however all it lacks is some power. Thats the main reason of the turbo conversion. Im not trying to build the fastest FWD, just wanting to have some nice pull from car thats all. many N16 owners from PGA have built low - mid 13sec daily drivers with standard internals.

I will be using a Haltech Interceptor Piggy Back or might even result to an Apexi AFC Neo.

I have sourced a practically brand new reco. T25G for $350 i may even end up buying and using that which will provide plenty of power to get my car going. I just thought that its probably better to invest into a BB turbo and have a faster spool.

Cheers

a small belt driven supercharger may be a better option than turbocharging

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...