Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

Just recently added a new lens to my set up and have decided that a decent flash is the next thing on my shopping list.

Unless someone can recommend a better flash for similar money I am now chasing the 580EX II

Has to be 'II' as my 40D has in built support for that flash only. Or so I read at dpreview.com

My Rig:

Canon 40D

70-200mm F/4 L USM

24-105mm F/4 L IS USM (to replace my crappy kit lens - 18-55mm) Hopefully 24mm is wide enough still though (crosses fingers).

So I Need a flash.

Can any suggest a good place to buy one? Or have one to sell or trade?

(I have a brand new 350D with kit lens 18-55mm that has only been taken out of the box to test (was supposed to be a 400D) - comes with wireless remote, basic external flash, carry bag, 1GB CF, all the original manuals, CD's and boxes etc - all in Mint condition)

At this stage I have found them being sold new on eBay for $500 delivered from an AU source - but if you can offer better or suggest better then please let me know. d-d-photographics offers them for closer to $600 inc delivery.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller...v#goto_itemInfo

Has them for around the $470 to $480 mark delivered depending on what our ozzie dollar does in the next few days (and if customs hits yo with import tax)

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/202845-canon-580ex-ii-flash/
Share on other sites

If it's your first flash, save your money and get a Sigma EF-500 Super. They're a crap load cheaper and are great to learn on. No point spending $200-300 more than you have to.

The Canon ones are great but really they're similarly specced and the only positives about getting the Canon is if you have more than 1 flash.

I have a 30D, as does my friend and we both swear by these flashes. Especially because having two means you can set up some pretty awesome wireless master/slave stuff.

In fact, if you have the money for the Canon, buy TWO Sigmas for about the same price!

Oh and you may find 24mm wont cut the mustard after being spoiled with 18mm. Sure the quality is better -- thought the 24-105 isn't one of canon's finest lenses.

I got the 17-50mm Tamron which is noisy (Autofocus) but the sharpness is in the same league as the Canon 50mm f1.4 and the 70-200 f4L. And it's actually usable at f2.8, unlike the Canon 50mm f1.8.

Yeah I have 2 kids and 18mm as a wide angle is amazing - kids tend to walk towards you when you take photos not away so wide angle works well.

Amazing how with 18mm you kid can stand right in front of you and yet you still can capture all of him and some of the surroundings as well...

(starts to get even more worried about the 24mm not being wide enough :) )

oh BTW - any suggestions on best place to buy the sigma flash?

I have not heard of it before. My main aim with the 580EXII is that the 40D has built in support - so I am hoping it will be able to handle most of the setting automatically when needed and leave me to play with the advanced settings when time permits.

I believe you'll find the old 580EXII will work fine with the 40D too. You just wont have the full benefits of some of the more advanced autofocus things or something.

Take note that there is a Sigma 530 and a 500. But hardly any difference so just get the cheaper one.

Both are fine, the 530 is a little newer that's all. Just make sure you get the one called "DG Super" as the "ST" and/or "Super" are lower powered, lower featured versions.

$459AUD - http://www.centre.net.au/index.html?cat=00...&it=product

$370AUD - Ebay Item

$345AUD - Ebay Item

$259USD - http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/5153...uper_Flash.html

(I'd recommend ordering from BH, great prices, fast shipping)

How do you think the Sigma 530 DG Super compares to the Canon 430EX? Better? as they are about the same price from bh.

The 530 on the surface appears to be closer to the 580EX II without the full TTL auto support though which may be something I need whilst learning.

If I was not going to be using the master slave wireless features for some time - is there any other major benefit to the 580 over the 430 when using a 40D?

Reason for asking is Dpreview.com states:

External flash

• In-camera flash configuration (currently only 580 EX II) *

Now what benefits does it give you have an "in-camera flash config"? Better Auto results? less need for manual intervention?

Other differences noted:

The 580 is 15m's better at 105mm

190' (58 m) at 105mm

141' (43 m) @ 105mm

Of concern though is that the 580 is a slower flash - the built in 40D flash - whilst being next to useless at distance shots can fire extremely rapidly...

Also the 430 is faster

3.7 Seconds (based on alkaline batteries & full power)

2 Seconds (based on NiMH batteries & full power)

compared to 580:

6 Seconds in normal mode (based on fresh alkaline batteries & full power)

3 Seconds in rapid mode (based on fresh alkaline batteries & full power)

hmmm also the 580 has a better Auto set up by the looks:

Auto Distance Range Full TTL at all apertures

Auto f/Stops Full TTL at all apertures

And has a better vari power range going to 1/128th compared to 1/64th

Ok now I am confused - spend more for a potentially more compatible flash (?? based on dpreviews comment) that is slower, or spend less on a faster lens that may need more manual intervention at this stage than my knowledge could offer?

430EX / 530 DG Super or 580EX II (bh sells these for $460 at the current exchange rate inc del)

Thoughts?

How do you think the Sigma 530 DG Super compares to the Canon 430EX? Better? as they are about the same price from bh.

The EF 500/530 is better than the 430EX in terms of features and power. The 430EX will probably have slightly better ETTL Auto Focus abilities, but this is very marginal.

The 530 on the surface appears to be closer to the 580EX II without the full TTL auto support though which may be something I need whilst learning.

Having less 'auto' features would be more benificial while learning. However, the 530EX, 580EX, Sigma 500 and the 430EX will all give similar auto results.

If I was not going to be using the master slave wireless features for some time - is there any other major benefit to the 580 over the 430 when using a 40D?
The power difference and other features are significant here. However take note, that the 430 only acts as a slave which can be limiting in the future, when a Sigma or 530/580EX will work as both and will be much more flexible for it.
Reason for asking is Dpreview.com states:

External flash

In-camera flash configuration (currently only 580 EX II) *

Now what benefits does it give you have an "in-camera flash config"? Better Auto results? less need for manual intervention?

Not 100% sure on this one, I would assume it's simply a way of controling the flash settings without taking your hands off the camera, which will probably yeild marginally better auto results.
Other differences noted:

The 580 is 15m's better at 105mm

190' (58 m) at 105mm

141' (43 m) @ 105mm

Which flashes is that comparison applied to? 580 vs ??
Of concern though is that the 580 is a slower flash - the built in 40D flash - whilst being next to useless at distance shots can fire extremely rapidly...

Also the 430 is faster

3.7 Seconds (based on alkaline batteries & full power)

2 Seconds (based on NiMH batteries & full power)

compared to 580:

6 Seconds in normal mode (based on fresh alkaline batteries & full power)

3 Seconds in rapid mode (based on fresh alkaline batteries & full power)

That's because the 430 is much less powerful flash. if you turn the 530/580EX down to the same power levels, their performance will be very similar.
Ok now I am confused - spend more for a potentially more compatible flash (?? based on dpreviews comment) that is slower, or spend less on a faster lens that may need more manual intervention at this stage than my knowledge could offer?
They're all similarly easy to use in Auto. You just point and shoot. All have advanced manual settings which are hard to learn, but they all work in the same kind of way, just with different features and costs.
430EX / 530 DG Super or 580EX II (bh sells these for $460 at the current exchange rate inc del)

Thoughts?

Personally, I wouldn't consider the 430 at all. It's between the Sigma and the 580. It all comes down to money really. If it were me, I'd probably get a sigma again.
Which flashes is that comparison applied to? 580 vs ??

The 580 is 15m's better at 105mm than the 430

190' (58 m) at 105mm 580EXII

174' (53 m) at 105mm 530 DG Super

141' (43 m) @ 105mm 430

Plus the Sigma is very slightly slower again than the 580 even though it has less power.

But it is hard to look past the price difference

BH:

580EX II $401.65 USD delivered ($467 AUD @ 0.86)

530 DG S$300.15 USD delivered ($349 AUD @ 0.86)

Only issue - save $120 now and regret later? or Spend it now and never find out if the sigma would have been more than enough ?? ;)

Edited by ShadowKnyght

I've got a 580EX I which I got cheap as it was an ex-display model. I haven't tried any of the other models/brands, but I can assure you the 580EX is just awesome. If you're only taking portrait shots you will never find you haven't got enough flash, thats for sure ;)

I've used a 430EX, 580EX (Original) and Sigma 500.

The Canon one is great, but not worth the extra spend.

Whatever one you choose, it'll most likely be more than you'll need and cost a lot more than you realistically needed to spend. With general photo work the flash wont come in much use, unless you do a lot of portrait work.

Spend as much as you think you need, as long as it flashes and is adjustable, it'll be better than the on-board flash by mile, and not because of the extra power or features, mostly comes down to the fact that you can bounce the light and soften the whole thing up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...