Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Here's a link to the R35 GT-R in testing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBifjuV_WUA&feature=user

Nissan have indicated that they are taking this very serious as the GT-R's racing heritage is so important. I know very little about the series though I thought the race car had very little in common with the road car, same as the v8 supercars in Aust. Therefore it's simply a case of the biggest wallet wins, provided they can buy the right talent?

Therefore the race car this year will only have progressed in a similar sort of fashion to that it would have done anyway whether it is a R35 GT-R shell or not.

Am I right in my thinking?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203298-new-gt-r-gt500-in-testing/
Share on other sites

Unlike the V8's which use 1960's NASCAR technology, the R35 still uses some factory parts including the gearbox. comparing the two is like comparing chocolate and shit ;)

I'm sure there is alot more in common between the race R35 and the production R35 then we think.

Unlike the V8's which use 1960's NASCAR technology, the R35 still uses some factory parts including the gearbox. comparing the two is like comparing chocolate and shit ;)

I'm sure there is alot more in common between the race R35 and the production R35 then we think.

if that is true it will be a big change from all other current Super GT cars which use conventional sequential boxes not DSGs.

and there is very little in common with the road going car, having seen and even touched the new R35 Super GT car it is just like most other Japanese Super GT cars. purpose built race car with a dry carbon body that resembles the road car. that's it.

if that is true it will be a big change from all other current Super GT cars which use conventional sequential boxes not DSGs.

Indeed. I'm trying to think of where i read that it uses teh same box. cant remember now :) hope I'm right.

Its not really fair to compare the super taxis to the gt500 cars - the gt cars have about 150hp less and are a couple of seconds a lap quicker. Neither are too close to production cars, they are just meant to look similar.

gt500 has long banned some of the gtr's production stuff like 4wd, not sure if the gearbox will be an issue as DSG isn't that dissimilar to a straight cut sequential box in shift time (and might be less reliable in racing conditions anyway).

Can't wait to see this car on track, I might head up to Malaysia in June to see it run

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...