Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey is that manual 6sp or auto? seems a little low actually, I was under the impression the V35s came stock with about 206-210kw (not at the wheels), so roughly ~158rwkw or ~211rwhp??

It's auto and actually it's too low. been serached all the stock dyno's on g35driver.com they have average 230-240hp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-3610909
Share on other sites

Its not a V35, but its close enough.

2003 VQ35DE in a Z33

JWT Popcharger

5/16" Intake Manifold Spacer

Motordyne MREV2

Reflashed factory ECU with higher redline

Unichip Piggyback

TopSpeed Extractors

Crawford Catalytic Converters

HiTech Exhaust

my350z_20070601_dynosheet.jpg

I've got several exhaust leaks at the moment, and the car's feeling a bit off, so I'm probably making less right now.

Edited by scathing
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-3613214
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

my car has been dynoed on the Unigroup Dyno earlier this year at a dyno day

made 178rwkw STOCK which is about right with the claimed 206kw engine power output

will post the graph up once i get a hold of it

its a 6mt 2004 v35

Edited by BLISTC
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-4169424
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've got my 2004 v35 dynoed at 153 kw at the rear wheels???

The only performance mod done is a cat back exhaust. Its no where near the 170 kw margin.

The dyno guy did have some trouble fixing the sensor into the single exhaust though. Should there be 2 sensors fixed if you've got a dual exhaust system??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-4199280
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

Lets bring back this thread.

I dyno 177rwkw right now but picking up the V with new extractors tomorrow then i'll dyno again. (the extractors are really hard to put on)

When i got my car i put it on the dyno and got 163rwkw stock 03 auto.

Do you guys think there is about a 10kw diff in manuel and auto?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-4965936
Share on other sites

v35 paul,

i have since gone back to unigroup and redynoed my car.

i have serious doubts that their dyno was calibrated properly when the previous owner had done the 177kw run when it was stock.

I have since had the car dynoed twice since then.

First time, was after i installed the plenum spacer and CF Z-Tube car made 164rwkw. ISMR dyno.

The 2nd time, i installed the stillen Air intake, lightweight flywheel / clutch and teh Motordyne exhaust. Car made 174kw. Unigroup dyno.

I seriously doubt the mods i have done to this car have made it slower. I suspect the dyno may have been reading "happy" and have since been calibrated. the 174rwkw seems about right. The car does feel faster now than before, there is no doubt about it. So it definatley hasnt lost power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-4966206
Share on other sites

Near when i first bought (exhaust, panel filter, tube, ground kit) - 131rwkw @ ISMR

Located and fixed overheating issue

Middle of ownership (exhaust, panel flter, tube, ground kit, HKS plugs, nismo thermostat, spacer) - 170rwkw @ ISMR

Just recently (ECU reflashed and rev limiter raised) - 182rwkw @ SAS

Car felt progressively/proportionately faster as i fixed the heat issue and added more mods. It's decent speed now, i'm very happy with it. I don't find myself thinking how i could make it faster anymore really.

Now it's more braking power i need.

Oh sorry, 03 6mt vq35de.

Edit - 182rwkw run also had gramlights on rear, a bit lighter than the factory 18"s. Even though they are wider and have larger tires on.

Edited by Touge Kyousou
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-4966348
Share on other sites

Near when i first bought (exhaust, panel filter, tube, ground kit) - 131rwkw @ ISMR

Located and fixed overheating issue

Middle of ownership (exhaust, panel flter, tube, ground kit, HKS plugs, nismo thermostat, spacer) - 170rwkw @ ISMR

Just recently (ECU reflashed and rev limiter raised) - 182rwkw @ SAS

Car felt progressively/proportionately faster as i fixed the heat issue and added more mods. It's decent speed now, i'm very happy with it. I don't find myself thinking how i could make it faster anymore really.

Now it's more braking power i need.

Oh sorry, 03 6mt vq35de.

Edit - 182rwkw run also had gramlights on rear, a bit lighter than the factory 18"s. Even though they are wider and have larger tires on.

What did you reflash with?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-4968475
Share on other sites

Custom flash (for my engine and mods) at SAS.

A few people with Z/V have got it done at SAS.. but they are in Sydney unfortunately (if you were looking to chase that).

Car is giving 5.9s to 100 with a soft/medium launch, can't complain for n/a luxo cruiser :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-4968909
Share on other sites

$1200.

It doesn't relearn, because they actually overwrite/write in their own data. I know one chip on the ECU actually gets replaced so unsure if AFR targets and ignition mapping is overwritten or even written onto the new chip they put in.

Proof that it doesn't relearn is the car hasn't pinged once since the flash/tune. Factory mapping had my engine pinging sometimes (quite a common problem on Z/V on forums).

If you do go ahead, just remember it's an n/a engine, don't expect massive amounts of difference before and after.

I did it more to get rid of the pinging myself. They managed to give me some noticeable mid range and top end gains however my low end suffered as ignition had to be pulled back considerably as the factory mapping was too aggressive causing the low end pinging.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203673-dyno-tune/#findComment-4969880
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...