Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

VicDrift is proud to announce our calender for 2008

This year the practice days will be all day practice! there will be NO comp on these days.

For those drivers with a more competative nature we are running a 4 round State championship series. These comps will be more serious than our usual "end of the day comp".

Feb 9th Calder park , saturday , Practice

March 16th winton raceway , SUNDAY , comp

April 19th winton raceway , saturday , practice

May 17th Calder park , saturday , comp

May 25th Calder park , sunday , DRIFT SKILL's (beginers day)

July 13th Calder park , sunday , DRIFT SKILL's

July 20th winton raceway , sunday , comp

August 9th Calder park , saturday , practice

September 6th winton raceway , saturday , practice

September 14th Calder park , sunday , DRIFT SKILL's

October 18th Calder park , saturday , comp

December 20th winton raceway , saturday , VicDrift members only day.

The club will be looking for a number of volunteer staff for these dates. If you would like to receive free spectator entry & lunch then please email- [email protected]

For more information please visit http://www.vicdrift.com for updates and further events.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204233-vicdrift-2008-calender/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

K people I've got the official word, we all went round for C-Spec bolg and meeting. We have decided that this next event, the 16/03/2008 will be run as a practice day.

Changes have also been made to the general running of each event this year. Practice/comp days will be run, the idea being that each event noted will be practice in the morning, qualifying in the afternoon for street & Pro classes and then points based comps in the afternoon. the top 16 will be seeded and placed in order of rank to go head to head in this year's Drift Attack!

look to the website. www.vicdrift.com for updates, and don't forget to sign up to our forum to stay current, and have a say with vicdrift

Thanks,

Joel Collie

VicDrift- Marketting Director

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...