Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2x good call

Don't know steve, I'd only be guessing.

Maybe speak to a few more tuners and go by the majority.

get a tomei FPR cause they look like the stock 1 and fit in the same position un like the other ones that u have 2 attach 2 the engine bay and have 2 run hoses which u may get defected 4
  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

get a tomei FPR cause they look like the stock 1 and fit in the same position un like the other ones that u have 2 attach 2 the engine bay and have 2 run hoses which u may get defected 4

Nismo fpr bolts directly onto the stock fuel rail like the original one and half the price of the Tomei.

Any idea what one would be best? they are both from Sliding Performance

Tomei Adjustable Fuel Regulator RB25

Model Number : 200771

Direct replacement for your standard item

Price and delivery from Australia

Australia : $175 Delivered 2-4 Days

Nismo Fuel Regulator R33 GTST, $169 Delivered

Any idea what one would be best? they are both from Sliding Performance

Tomei Adjustable Fuel Regulator RB25

Model Number : 200771

Direct replacement for your standard item

Price and delivery from Australia

Australia : $175 Delivered 2-4 Days

Nismo Fuel Regulator R33 GTST, $169 Delivered

im sure they both are good and both look stock, but why have them sent from interstate when u can buy them here in sa??

by the way there is nothing wrong with your modified plenum, if i can get 300+rwkw from mine which is the same im sure u can aswell

truth is you dont need a FPR til around 350 rwkw... ive seen a few cars making that power, reliably, with the stock nissan reg!!

what you need is bigger injectors, a good pump and a tune :no: Steve: in your case, go get some S15 injectors then tune the PFC and you'll be laughing.

yeah S15 480cc are plug and play

was going to buy a set but decided on deatschwerks, for the price

ordered 450cc (sneaky sneaky lol) they said no stock, how about 550's for same price

lol

now Simon, I dont agree with "what you need is bigger injectors, a good pump and a tune".

it always comes down to budget. if someone cant afford the Minimum $500 for 480cc+ injectors, then a $165 Nismo FPR isnt a bad thing. Using aftermarket ecu or piggybacks, the fpr can be made to work Well with a larger fuel pump, etc.

Ive been happy with each tune Ive paid for since having the FPR. 120awkw original plus fuel pump/fpr/safc went to 140awkw, added stuff retuned to 160awkw tune, then 190rwkw tune x 2

next tune stock FPR will go back on, as I'll have the injectors and the Pfc. so it wont be needed.

but yeah I argue those who say FPRs are shit. they have their place IMO.

bill @ ATS told me stock inj. on a R33 are good for 230kw dont know if RB20 are the same cc im guessing possibly not

hey just got my car tuned yesterday i hav a s1 r33 gtst: ase FMIC, HKS 3.5" cat back, 500hp walbro fp, and pod. running 11 psi and i made 221.1rwkw. No remap or nothing, guys at turbo tune were suprised considering the mods and so was i :)

i have proven that you can make good power with FPR and pump.... mine made 283 rwkw on STOCK INJECTORS with a malpassi rising rate. even now in its current trim it makes 265 rwkw, still stock injectors and less boost to keep it reliable.

that said tho.. more pressure in the rail puts more strain on various parts, such as the pump, o rings, injectors themselves etc... the risk of failure is higher.

So ive decided to upgrade my injectors and back the fuel pressure off a bit. and aim to make the same power (adding cams to but thats a different story)

yeah S15 480cc are plug and play

was going to buy a set but decided on deatschwerks, for the price

ordered 450cc (sneaky sneaky lol) they said no stock, how about 550's for same price

lol

now Simon, I dont agree with "what you need is bigger injectors, a good pump and a tune".

it always comes down to budget. if someone cant afford the Minimum $500 for 480cc+ injectors, then a $165 Nismo FPR isnt a bad thing. Using aftermarket ecu or piggybacks, the fpr can be made to work Well with a larger fuel pump, etc.

Ive been happy with each tune Ive paid for since having the FPR. 120awkw original plus fuel pump/fpr/safc went to 140awkw, added stuff retuned to 160awkw tune, then 190rwkw tune x 2

next tune stock FPR will go back on, as I'll have the injectors and the Pfc. so it wont be needed.

but yeah I argue those who say FPRs are shit. they have their place IMO.

i have proven that you can make good power with FPR and pump.... mine made 283 rwkw on STOCK INJECTORS with a malpassi rising rate. even now in its current trim it makes 265 rwkw, still stock injectors and less boost to keep it reliable.

that said tho.. more pressure in the rail puts more strain on various parts, such as the pump, o rings, injectors themselves etc... the risk of failure is higher.

So ive decided to upgrade my injectors and back the fuel pressure off a bit. and aim to make the same power (adding cams to but thats a different story)

Did you check your injector cycle under load? Were they maxing out? Once you go past 80% injector cycle, it's usually time for an upgrade. At 283kw with STD injectors I reckon you must have been coming close.

that said tho.. more pressure in the rail puts more strain on various parts, such as the pump, o rings, injectors themselves etc... the risk of failure is higher.

Thats a risk Im willing to take with the 31, as it'll be driven mostly on the track. (only take it out on the street rarely)

I dont want to spend any more cash on it anyways :thumbsup: I just want to drive the f**ker.

Did you check your injector cycle under load? Were they maxing out? Once you go past 80% injector cycle, it's usually time for an upgrade. At 283kw with STD injectors I reckon you must have been coming close.

yeah they were pretty close to 100% tho not quite hitting it... I certainly didnt want to run this much boost and on maxed out injectors.. so we wound the boost down and retuned for 265 rwkw... still heaps of head room with the injectors.

however the rail pressure is higher, i'm going to chuck a set of S15 injectors in there and then still run the FPR but only have the railpressure slightly more then stock.

yeah they were pretty close to 100% tho not quite hitting it... I certainly didnt want to run this much boost and on maxed out injectors.. so we wound the boost down and retuned for 265 rwkw... still heaps of head room with the injectors.

however the rail pressure is higher, i'm going to chuck a set of S15 injectors in there and then still run the FPR but only have the railpressure slightly more then stock.

Yeah I'm still at the experimental stage with fuel pressure so not sure how much I should be running in the SARD rail yet.

My setup as of this week will be

660 sard injectors

gt2871r 56T

Power fc

bosch 040

z32 afm

at the moment getting a very responsive 200.1rwkw on 8psi with no tune afr's are 10:1 across the board. Hoping for a responsive 240-250ish on 17psi with a fat torquey midrange.

i heard years ago FPR's can create an uneven spray from the injectors, can you shed some light simon?

i call BS on the un even spray... irs more or less due to the fact that a FPR change means that you have to retune it, cause the FPR is spraying more fuel in per given time on the injector... so the injector timing needs to be brought back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
×
×
  • Create New...