Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hay guys i need some help im Installing a 25 turbo in my rb20 my stock one blew up last nite i need my car for next week and ive been told that i need to weld a nipple on my intercooler piping for a boost line but im not sure were to put it and which line goes to it and if i need to do anything to make it fit anything you guys know to help me out will be great thanks

Daniel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205038-installing-rb25-turbo-in-rb20/
Share on other sites

You mean a nipple that you connect to a boost controller? On my RB25 the boost line goes from a nipple in the intercooler piping leading to the intake plenum, goes through my manual boost controller, and connects to the wastegate actuator on the turbo.

If you've done some welding it's a DIY job, but should be cheap for a workshop to do.

Try this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/In...st-t185848.html

Do a search for some entra info, and check the DIY thread.

Good luck mate.

Edited by R338OY

Reason for needing to do that is that on RB20 turbos the wastegate line is connected to a nipple that reads vacuum from the compressor housing. Not entirely the smartest idea. While the RB25 turbos having an updated design that reads vacuum from just before the throttle body. ie. a vacuum line runs from the actuator to the intercooler piping.

Some A/M intercooler piping, mainly the 20/25 type already have a vacuum line nipple installed on the piping that sits just before the factory hardpipe (which the factory BOV sits on). Anyway by far the easiest way is to drill a small hole on the intercooler piping and then buy yourself a fitting that screws into the piping which has a nipple on the end. No need for welding when there is an easier alternative. Just to be sure to use some thread tape to ensure it seals completely. Then you can run the vacuum line from the wastegate actuator to the nipple.

Reason for needing to do that is that on RB20 turbos the wastegate line is connected to a nipple that reads vacuum from the compressor housing. Not entirely the smartest idea. While the RB25 turbos having an updated design that reads vacuum from just before the throttle body. ie. a vacuum line runs from the actuator to the intercooler piping.

The wastegate actuator doesn't 'read' vacuum pressure.....it needs positive pressure so it knows when to open the wastegate

Why isn't a good idea to get the pressure from the comp housing?

Isn't that where it would be most accurate? no pressure drop through all the piping

As long as there's no boost leaks it's more accurate for the nipple to be before the throttle body. It's a truer measure of the amount of boost being used by the motor. If there are boost leaks then the wastegate actuator will need more boost to open the wastegate, and that means making the turbo work too hard, which can be dangerous at higher levels.

That said, if there aren't boost leaks whether it's at the comp. housing or not should make little difference.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...