Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hay guys i need some help im Installing a 25 turbo in my rb20 my stock one blew up last nite i need my car for next week and ive been told that i need to weld a nipple on my intercooler piping for a boost line but im not sure were to put it and which line goes to it and if i need to do anything to make it fit anything you guys know to help me out will be great thanks

Daniel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205038-installing-rb25-turbo-in-rb20/
Share on other sites

You mean a nipple that you connect to a boost controller? On my RB25 the boost line goes from a nipple in the intercooler piping leading to the intake plenum, goes through my manual boost controller, and connects to the wastegate actuator on the turbo.

If you've done some welding it's a DIY job, but should be cheap for a workshop to do.

Try this thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/In...st-t185848.html

Do a search for some entra info, and check the DIY thread.

Good luck mate.

Edited by R338OY

Reason for needing to do that is that on RB20 turbos the wastegate line is connected to a nipple that reads vacuum from the compressor housing. Not entirely the smartest idea. While the RB25 turbos having an updated design that reads vacuum from just before the throttle body. ie. a vacuum line runs from the actuator to the intercooler piping.

Some A/M intercooler piping, mainly the 20/25 type already have a vacuum line nipple installed on the piping that sits just before the factory hardpipe (which the factory BOV sits on). Anyway by far the easiest way is to drill a small hole on the intercooler piping and then buy yourself a fitting that screws into the piping which has a nipple on the end. No need for welding when there is an easier alternative. Just to be sure to use some thread tape to ensure it seals completely. Then you can run the vacuum line from the wastegate actuator to the nipple.

Reason for needing to do that is that on RB20 turbos the wastegate line is connected to a nipple that reads vacuum from the compressor housing. Not entirely the smartest idea. While the RB25 turbos having an updated design that reads vacuum from just before the throttle body. ie. a vacuum line runs from the actuator to the intercooler piping.

The wastegate actuator doesn't 'read' vacuum pressure.....it needs positive pressure so it knows when to open the wastegate

Why isn't a good idea to get the pressure from the comp housing?

Isn't that where it would be most accurate? no pressure drop through all the piping

As long as there's no boost leaks it's more accurate for the nipple to be before the throttle body. It's a truer measure of the amount of boost being used by the motor. If there are boost leaks then the wastegate actuator will need more boost to open the wastegate, and that means making the turbo work too hard, which can be dangerous at higher levels.

That said, if there aren't boost leaks whether it's at the comp. housing or not should make little difference.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not that I know from experience, but in theory you'd want your gate spring to be as close to target pressure as possible, so you'd go with the higher gate spring?
    • Before I commit to it as I already have the wastegate off the car, would you change it to the 9psi spring instead of the 12, or whack it back on now and try your suggestion?   Edit: Actually I might just swap the spring and see what the logs say after another few pulls, as we know it's still spiking without the Mac valve in the picture so I need more data without the Mac valve trying to combat the issue.
    • Sounds good Hmm suppose the main thing is, how much do you care about this car? The filler doesn't make for a very good water barrier lol. If there was a tiny little bit of rust forming now, that in 3 to 5 years time becomes obvious under the paint (starts to bubble up), would it bother you? 
    • I already have the ability to datalog the voltage... what I can't do is correlate it to what the gauge is showing when I'm looking at the data at a later date. Or something like this. Except getting the oil to 125C+ involves me going 200+kmh at the track so you can imagine this is a little tricky unless I do something like note what the voltage is when I am at the top of 5th gear so I have a point to reference on. Drove car today. O2 still reading richer because hopefully not a leak instead of massive restriction I've introduced. Car really doesn't sound like a LS. It's quite strange. Pulled a bit of fuel out up top. This does potentially explain why my spark plugs looked like the car was running pretty over-rich. If I was tuning it to a ~12.7 which in reality was far richer than that in the past. It will be handy to have the dyno WB to compare my WB to to compare notes that's for sure. At this point I'm happy to just sit in the passenger seat and tune the thing given I've got about 7 million hours on the platform lol.
    • Yeah I understand you have to pay for an updated map or subscription service or something. But I can't even find a current map for Australia. My map is dated 2017, but didn't this car version still sell in Australia until 2021?   Also, just as an aside, the navigation system warns you of traffic incidences ahead.....why would they include that on a map they knew is not receiving live information. I am forever going to be warned of an incident that probably existed for 30 minutes 8 years ago.
×
×
  • Create New...