Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am all set to put a RB25 turbo, Walbro fuel pump, Turbotech Boost Controller and a Apexi SAFC 2 aiming for 180kw-200kw.

Ive rang a place that was recommended here, and they say that with my piggyback ecu, there will not be much power gains as the ecu will reach boost cut and theres no way this can be removed with the SAFC. This is because the r33 turbo, flowing more air, will reach boost cut at lower boost pressure as opposed to the r32 turbo reach boost cut at higher boost, which makes not much difference in power.

Could someone clear this up as im fairly confused after reading so many threads stating otherwise.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206545-modifying-the-rb20/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SAFC = AFM Signal Bender.

It tricks the ECU into thinking there's less air coming in then there actually is. I'm sure you knew that already though.

There is no feasible reason why they can't tune it with the safc.

They either:

A) are idiots, or are unaware what a safc does

or

B)don't want your business

Otherwise try and tell them it can be done.

be prepared for a big bill....

ye, they said if there isnt any dramas with the swap, that is bolts seized and what not, then it should be ~$250 for the swap, and ~$200 for the tune by Jim. So fair pricing i say

$450.. lol..

let us know when it's done.

I would like to see dyno printout and paid invoice.

should be interesting to see which one has a higher curve.

LOL!!!

that's an extremely cheap price for a turbo swap and tune. maybe if they have done it a million times then they can do it that quickly? i hope so for your sake! definately let us know what they end up charging you, my brother wants to pay someone to do this for him, and he wont pay me...

hmm, wat is the more realistic price? Im willing to pay the average price, just dont want to pay above average. Ive called some more work shops, and the average seems to be the 400 mark for the turbo swap, 200 for SAFC tune

I'm sure CRD will do an outstanding job and will not make a mistake.

what I am saying is that they are a very well known workshop with great experience and are pretty much famous for what they do.

this sort of creditation does not come cheap.

if he said $250 to replace turbo and $200 for tune, then I hope that he keeps that.

If I were you, I would do the following before going there for this work.

Oil and oil filter change.

air filter change/clean

new copper spark plugs set to 0.8mm gap (search these forums for part number you need to buy)

tape up your coil packs (search forum for this too)

Also, going by your first post...

I am all set to put a RB25 turbo, Walbro fuel pump, Turbotech Boost Controller and a Apexi SAFC 2 aiming for 180kw-200kw

I will assume that all these items will need to be fitted/installed/set?

you will be charged extra for time to install all of these.

and parts like clamp for the walbro pump, vacuum lines for the boost controller, the nipple that needs to be tapped in to your Intercooler piping for the boost controller to be used with the RB25 turbo.

also, if you don't have the elbow pipe (first part of the intercooler piping bolted to the turbo) from the RB25, then they will charge you for modifying the stock one to fit.

There have been no mention of gaskets in your posts and I doubt that CRD will use the gaskets that are on your car now as they may leak and you will complain to them so to prevent this, they will get new manifold to turbo and turbo to dump pipe gaskets (about $35)

Bolts/studs that will snap = $?? not much.

time taken to drill out the broken studs = $?? not much

cost of new stainless studs, bolts, and those little washer type clamps that hold the bolts in place = $?? not much.

If you can, I would seriously ask for the quote for all of the above in writing.

Also, I'm surprised that CRD took on this job as it is a VERY small job compared to what they are known for.

I can assure you that all of the wrench work above will be done by an apprentice and the tuning of the safc will be Jim.

I suggest you have alot more than $450 with you or set aside when you go to pay.

I hope for your sake that you walk out with 180rwkw and $450 lighter, but I doubt it all very much... on both the power and $'s.

Thanks for the detailed response GTST, appreciate it.

I will be able to install the safc. Nipple has been attached to the elbow, so thats ready to go. Walbro pump will be installed by them too for $100 they said. Gaskets, bolts, vacuum hoses im willing to pay as install cant be done without them. Im prepared for the extra couple hundred dollars it may cost.

CRD have agreed to replace the turbo and pump while i wait, and then bring it in the next day for a tune. So im very happy that they have let me do this, coz i want to be aprt of the whole tuning atmosphere and that.

So u rekon 180kw is not acheiveable with the mods i have?

SAFC does not adjust timing so no. I don't think that you will get 180rwkw with an RB25 turbo and SAFC tune.

also, don't forget the oil and plug change.

they WILL make you do this on the day and they WILL supply and fit Iridium plugs which are about $22 - $25 each.

times 6 = another $150.

oil and filter + labour will charge you over $100 for that too.

When you booked in for?

4th of March, i already have Iridiums and Oil change is coming up, so that will be done next week. I think my plugs need to be regapped though to .8mm as i get some hesitation at 5000+rpm

Ive currently got full 3" Xforce exhaust, fmic, catco cat and Apexi Pod

Edited by mark_sudakov

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...