Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, i am finally going to pony up and buy some wheels spefically with the goal of getting the widest rubber under my car as i want to try and squeeze a lap time out of it :cheers:

So i am planning oin running a good quality 8.5" front rim and 9.5" rear rim with 235/40/17 RE55s on the front and 245/40/17s on the rear.

Now the question is that over a single lap, would you expect to see a car running the same tyre and rim width combination, only 18" run a quicker time? Allowing for the fact that the 18" rim/tyre package is bound to be heavier?

My gut feel is there wouldnt be a real difference, only i know of a person with an R33 GTR who changed from R33 gTR rims to R34 GTR rims and dropped over 1.5seconds off his best time. What i cant do is quantify how much of that is the diameter change, just more practice, or the fact he went from 255 to 245 on the 9" wheel????

Ppls thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206596-rim-performance-17-vs-18/
Share on other sites

I've got a good video you can watch that might answer your question. It was some best motoring video using an evo which had 'normal' wheels and wheels which were slightly lighter. There wasn't a big difference.

I'll try to get you the video.

I think it was in this video. I tried to look for it on youtube for easier viewing, but I couldn't find it. It's an interesting video.

Edit: It's free to sign up.

Edited by adam-__-

According to this comparo by Option, rigidity is more important than weight.

Not only did it punch out a better absolute lap time, but it was better on the tyres and deformed less so the suspension could do its work better, which means you could probably run more consistent fast laps.

Since I doubt you're going to be doing one-lap dashes and pulling over to let the tyres cool before trying to set another hot lap, consistency might be relevant to your goals.

Assuming the rims are the same type and the rigidity is constant, it boils down to whether the smaller sidewalled tyre on the bigger rim makes enough of a difference.

The smaller rim will have cheaper tyres, of course, which means you can afford to get more laps in to try running a faster time.

If that were the case why doesn't F1 and v8 supercars etc run super low profiles? Or does it have more to do with regulations more than anything?

F1 cars are irrelevant.

V8's run 17" because thats what the regulations say. That started in 1993, so it is an old reg based around old tech. No one else of note goes this small on diameter.

If you take a look at the old super tourers the ran big wheels diameters because their regs said with a flat/no tyre the body work couldn't scape ont he ground.

As for Roy's question. Hmmmm.

I suspect the answer would be yes. The weight thing isn't exactly obvious as the tyres themselves weigh as much as the rims. On the up side you get loads of room for rotors/calipers. On the downside it will probably cost you near on $500 each time you change tyres if you go for 18's rather than 17's. Plus the rims themselves will be more expensive.

Money better spent elsewhere?

Mate, while there would be a tiny difference in lap time if you ran EXACTLY the same lap back to back (which is never going to happen) I'd say in a real world situation it wouldn't make much of a difference. That 1.5sec in the 33gtr (and I know who you are talking about :) ) would be down to the driver having more experience plus perhaps he was trying different suspn settings.

More of a consideration is cost of tyres, maximizing the track and what brake setup you can fit under the rim.

OK, i am finally going to pony up and buy some wheels spefically with the goal of getting the widest rubber under my car as i want to try and squeeze a lap time out of it :D

So i am planning oin running a good quality 8.5" front rim and 9.5" rear rim with 235/40/17 RE55s on the front and 245/40/17s on the rear.

Now the question is that over a single lap, would you expect to see a car running the same tyre and rim width combination, only 18" run a quicker time? Allowing for the fact that the 18" rim/tyre package is bound to be heavier?

My gut feel is there wouldnt be a real difference, only i know of a person with an R33 GTR who changed from R33 gTR rims to R34 GTR rims and dropped over 1.5seconds off his best time. What i cant do is quantify how much of that is the diameter change, just more practice, or the fact he went from 255 to 245 on the 9" wheel????

Ppls thoughts?

If only it were that simple.

On one of the Production Cars we went from 16" to 17" tyres this year. I had to make quite a lot of suspension hardware changes (eg; softer springs) and the geometry was quite different (eg; less camber).

On one of the Improved Production Cars we went for 17" wheels to 16" wheels and it was 0.75 secs faster at OP, without changing anything. Why? Because the compound in the 16" A048 is softer than in the 17".

There is no quick/easy answer here, all I can suggest is that you do your homework on tyre compounds first. Then make sure you have sufficient budget to change at least spring rates and allocate the time to optimise the geometry.

Cheers

Gary

If only it were that simple.

On one of the Production Cars we went from 16" to 17" tyres this year. I had to make quite a lot of suspension hardware changes (eg; softer springs) and the geometry was quite different (eg; less camber).

On one of the Improved Production Cars we went for 17" wheels to 16" wheels and it was 0.75 secs faster at OP, without changing anything. Why? Because the compound in the 16" A048 is softer than in the 17".

There is no quick/easy answer here, all I can suggest is that you do your homework on tyre compounds first. Then make sure you have sufficient budget to change at least spring rates and allocate the time to optimise the geometry.

Cheers

Gary

So could you reasonably say that with 18" rims you would look to less camber & softer springs?

So could you reasonably say that with 18" rims you would look to less camber & softer springs?

Generally speaking, yes, assuming the overall diameter is the same (ie; lower profile tyres are used). Tyres are a spring and less sidewall means less spring (ie; higher rate). So when you increase the tyre's "spring" rate you need to decrease the spring's rate to compensate. Camber is not so straight forward, there is less sidewall to flex, so in a straight line (acceleration or braking) you need less camber to keep the tyre contact patch up. We also tend to run lower tyre pressures with lower profile tyres, which affects the rigidity as well. So, as usual, I let the pyrometer tell me how much camber to run.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...