Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, i am finally going to pony up and buy some wheels spefically with the goal of getting the widest rubber under my car as i want to try and squeeze a lap time out of it :cheers:

So i am planning oin running a good quality 8.5" front rim and 9.5" rear rim with 235/40/17 RE55s on the front and 245/40/17s on the rear.

Now the question is that over a single lap, would you expect to see a car running the same tyre and rim width combination, only 18" run a quicker time? Allowing for the fact that the 18" rim/tyre package is bound to be heavier?

My gut feel is there wouldnt be a real difference, only i know of a person with an R33 GTR who changed from R33 gTR rims to R34 GTR rims and dropped over 1.5seconds off his best time. What i cant do is quantify how much of that is the diameter change, just more practice, or the fact he went from 255 to 245 on the 9" wheel????

Ppls thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206596-rim-performance-17-vs-18/
Share on other sites

I've got a good video you can watch that might answer your question. It was some best motoring video using an evo which had 'normal' wheels and wheels which were slightly lighter. There wasn't a big difference.

I'll try to get you the video.

I think it was in this video. I tried to look for it on youtube for easier viewing, but I couldn't find it. It's an interesting video.

Edit: It's free to sign up.

Edited by adam-__-

According to this comparo by Option, rigidity is more important than weight.

Not only did it punch out a better absolute lap time, but it was better on the tyres and deformed less so the suspension could do its work better, which means you could probably run more consistent fast laps.

Since I doubt you're going to be doing one-lap dashes and pulling over to let the tyres cool before trying to set another hot lap, consistency might be relevant to your goals.

Assuming the rims are the same type and the rigidity is constant, it boils down to whether the smaller sidewalled tyre on the bigger rim makes enough of a difference.

The smaller rim will have cheaper tyres, of course, which means you can afford to get more laps in to try running a faster time.

If that were the case why doesn't F1 and v8 supercars etc run super low profiles? Or does it have more to do with regulations more than anything?

F1 cars are irrelevant.

V8's run 17" because thats what the regulations say. That started in 1993, so it is an old reg based around old tech. No one else of note goes this small on diameter.

If you take a look at the old super tourers the ran big wheels diameters because their regs said with a flat/no tyre the body work couldn't scape ont he ground.

As for Roy's question. Hmmmm.

I suspect the answer would be yes. The weight thing isn't exactly obvious as the tyres themselves weigh as much as the rims. On the up side you get loads of room for rotors/calipers. On the downside it will probably cost you near on $500 each time you change tyres if you go for 18's rather than 17's. Plus the rims themselves will be more expensive.

Money better spent elsewhere?

Mate, while there would be a tiny difference in lap time if you ran EXACTLY the same lap back to back (which is never going to happen) I'd say in a real world situation it wouldn't make much of a difference. That 1.5sec in the 33gtr (and I know who you are talking about :) ) would be down to the driver having more experience plus perhaps he was trying different suspn settings.

More of a consideration is cost of tyres, maximizing the track and what brake setup you can fit under the rim.

OK, i am finally going to pony up and buy some wheels spefically with the goal of getting the widest rubber under my car as i want to try and squeeze a lap time out of it :D

So i am planning oin running a good quality 8.5" front rim and 9.5" rear rim with 235/40/17 RE55s on the front and 245/40/17s on the rear.

Now the question is that over a single lap, would you expect to see a car running the same tyre and rim width combination, only 18" run a quicker time? Allowing for the fact that the 18" rim/tyre package is bound to be heavier?

My gut feel is there wouldnt be a real difference, only i know of a person with an R33 GTR who changed from R33 gTR rims to R34 GTR rims and dropped over 1.5seconds off his best time. What i cant do is quantify how much of that is the diameter change, just more practice, or the fact he went from 255 to 245 on the 9" wheel????

Ppls thoughts?

If only it were that simple.

On one of the Production Cars we went from 16" to 17" tyres this year. I had to make quite a lot of suspension hardware changes (eg; softer springs) and the geometry was quite different (eg; less camber).

On one of the Improved Production Cars we went for 17" wheels to 16" wheels and it was 0.75 secs faster at OP, without changing anything. Why? Because the compound in the 16" A048 is softer than in the 17".

There is no quick/easy answer here, all I can suggest is that you do your homework on tyre compounds first. Then make sure you have sufficient budget to change at least spring rates and allocate the time to optimise the geometry.

Cheers

Gary

If only it were that simple.

On one of the Production Cars we went from 16" to 17" tyres this year. I had to make quite a lot of suspension hardware changes (eg; softer springs) and the geometry was quite different (eg; less camber).

On one of the Improved Production Cars we went for 17" wheels to 16" wheels and it was 0.75 secs faster at OP, without changing anything. Why? Because the compound in the 16" A048 is softer than in the 17".

There is no quick/easy answer here, all I can suggest is that you do your homework on tyre compounds first. Then make sure you have sufficient budget to change at least spring rates and allocate the time to optimise the geometry.

Cheers

Gary

So could you reasonably say that with 18" rims you would look to less camber & softer springs?

So could you reasonably say that with 18" rims you would look to less camber & softer springs?

Generally speaking, yes, assuming the overall diameter is the same (ie; lower profile tyres are used). Tyres are a spring and less sidewall means less spring (ie; higher rate). So when you increase the tyre's "spring" rate you need to decrease the spring's rate to compensate. Camber is not so straight forward, there is less sidewall to flex, so in a straight line (acceleration or braking) you need less camber to keep the tyre contact patch up. We also tend to run lower tyre pressures with lower profile tyres, which affects the rigidity as well. So, as usual, I let the pyrometer tell me how much camber to run.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
    • Which solenoid? Why was it changed? Again, why was this done? ...well, these wear..but ultimately, why was it changed? Did you reset the idle voltage level after fitment? I'm just a tad confused ~ the flash code doesn't allude to these items being faulty, so in my mind the only reason to change these things, would be some drive-ability issue....and if that's the case, what was the problem? Those questions aside, check if the dropping resistor is OK ...should be 11~14 ohms (TCU doesn't throw a flash code for this) ~ also, these TCU designs have full time power (to keep fault code RAM alive), and I think that'll throw a logic code (as opposed to the 10 hardware codes), if that power is missing (or the ram has gone bad in the TCU, which you can check..but that's another story here perhaps).
    • Question for people who "know stuff" I am looking at doing the new intake like the one in the picture (the pictured is designed for the OEM TB and intake plenum), this design has the filter behind the front bar, but, the filter sits where the OEM duct heads into the front bar, and the standard aperture when the OEM ducting is removed allows the filter to pulled back out of the front bar into the engine bay for servicing, a simple blanking plate is used to seal the aperture behind the filter This will require a 45° silicone hose from the TB, like the alloy pipe that is currently there, to another 45° silicone hose to get a straight run to the aperture in the front bar Question: how will it effect the tune if I move the MAF about 100-150mm forward, the red is around where my MAF is currently, and the green would be where it would end up Like this This is the hole the filter goes through  Ends up like this LOL..Cheers    
    • Despite the level up question, actually I do know what that is....it is a pressure sender wire.  So check out around the oil filter for an oil pressure sender, or maybe fuel pressure near the filter or on the engine. Possibly but less likely coolant pressure sensor because they tend to be combined temp/pressure senders if you have one. Could also be brake pressure (in a brake line somewhere pre ABS) but maybe I'm the only one that has that on a skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...