Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

After going throu bout 40 odd pages of search resaults on plenums and not finding what i was after thought i would make a post.

I'm lookin at doin the front mounted throttle body to a stock plenum. Main question/ thing troubling me is;

People saying that air will be "forced" to cyl 6 and 5 and less air avail to 1 an 2

I don't think this would happen as aren't gases ment to expand\ contract to equalise the area they're in??

And just after some general feedback from people with\ had one any dramas, or noticable changes

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/207013-front-facing-stock-plenum/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey guys,

After going throu bout 40 odd pages of search resaults on plenums and not finding what i was after thought i would make a post.

I'm lookin at doin the front mounted throttle body to a stock plenum. Main question/ thing troubling me is;

People saying that air will be "forced" to cyl 6 and 5 and less air avail to 1 an 2

I don't think this would happen as aren't gases ment to expand\ contract to equalise the area they're in??

And just after some general feedback from people with\ had one any dramas, or noticable changes

Just because air isn't as heavy as most fluids doesn't mean that it doesn't display properties of fulids. It has a mass and even though it is very small it will still take time to deviate from its path so if you think of it as a fluid then in front mounted throttle body the majority of flow is perpendicular to the direction you want it to head. eg1 even though there is a large negative pressure differential in cylinder 1 the air still has to turn a 90deg bend in order to fill that cylinder. This is still the case even when on boost as the air within the plenum is never stagnent unless it has a massive volume.

If you want more proof look up various SAE articles about manifold design and you will see that there are large air flow differences usually in the last few cylinders. This is probably one of the reasons rb26's run lean in the num6 cylinder.

under pressure, distribution of air is completely equal.

Unfortunately incorrect in relation to a forward facing plenum, including RB26's.

As Rob says, air has inertia. Its why most people fit their highest flowing injectors in the last two cylinders. Its why most ppl det the last two cylinders (well, and less head coolant circulation back there) People use the Greddy jobby for trying to equalize flow. Mines R34 uses the Nismo one, which if you look at its overall size, isn't used because of its outright flow.

Mort, as you might have read, many people have measured big flow differences over a myriad of pressures with a mod'd 25 plenum. I think URAS has actual flow numbers.

Its not "too" much of an issue as long as you take measures to trim AFR's across the cylinders... this isn't a complete solution though, as the flow differences between runners, change with flow rate, ie - RPM.

They're just the issues with long plenum's, the issue is made even worse by mod'd the 25 unit (i read) having distribution fins or ribs inside it, that assist the function when the TB is mounted factory midway.

Iv never done the mod, nor seen the results with my own eyes, though would figure as long as you don't lean on the motor too hard, you should be fine.

Edited by GeeTR

ive got a rb25 with a modified stock plenum facing forward

had it for a few years, motor is fine

apparently there is evidence of low rpm pinging, knock never shows up on powerfc

made working on the engine easier

engine is down a few rwkw on what it should be though, dont know if thats related to plenum, just this motor itself or its something else

So its best advised to do this with an aftermarket ecu, after injectors have been replaced\ flow tested

or don't risk it and leave it be and save for a proper one

have a spare plenum in the shed, might have a looksy tomorrow for fins or anything

cos the one thing i always thought was if your gonna move the intake to the front and "lean" out 5&6 then why at the stock position don't say 1&6 "lean" as the air is coming in hitting the far wall and i'm guessing going left and right from there and one would think 1&6 would get more air, oh well as stated will have a look for ribs or fins tomorrow

One could theorize that the air "slug" has been split in half, and is now a little more turbulent from the 900 turn. This aids in more even distribution. All guess work of course, until someone CAD's it up, and runs it through a FEA.

You don't necessarily need an aftermarket ECU, its like umm, like a pack of snow dogs, the team as an entity, will only be as fast as the slowest dog; that is, your tuner will stop winding boost and ignition into the motor when those more sensitive cylinders start complaining, loosing you maybe 20kw that you would have got if you could tune to the max of the less sensitive ones.

As long as a decent safety margin is kept, you should really be no worse off.

You need some responses from people who have actually tuned an RB with the mod done i think.

Edited by GeeTR
  • 1 month later...
They're just the issues with long plenum's, the issue is made even worse by mod'd the 25 unit (i read) having distribution fins or ribs inside it, that assist the function when the TB is mounted factory midway.

i dont know about RB25DET ones but I ripped out my RB20 one, it has jack inside, no fins or ribs (well, there are real shallow ribs but they are more structural than flow-related). There is nothing in there to stop two middle cylinders getting more air than other cylinders, 2 & 5 cylinders getting less air and 1 & 6 even less air.

As i mentioned, I've NFI if a 20 is the same as a 25, I've never eyeballed one.

EGT's from mod'd 25 plenums tell the real story.

Check out the "Do i keep my 6 TB" thread ATM in Forced Induction. Theres some interesting talk, and per cyl AFR results.

For the cost of tuning the engine with 6 o2 sensors, you could easily fit a greddy plenum.

Also in regards to tuning to the "worst" cylinder theory, there is no way to know if one cylinder is running vastly leaner than the rest with a single o2 sensor in the dump pipe, it reads an average of all the cylinders

under pressure, distribution of air is completly equal.

This is true but only in a static sense...As soon as flow occurs you have friction on the walls of the plenum as well as turbulence and the pressure distribution will be different...

For the cost of tuning the engine with 6 o2 sensors, you could easily fit a greddy plenum.

Also in regards to tuning to the "worst" cylinder theory, there is no way to know if one cylinder is running vastly leaner than the rest with a single o2 sensor in the dump pipe, it reads an average of all the cylinders

Has anyone ever tried using a non contact temperature gun (too early in the morning for me to remember the exact name) to measure individual cyclinder EGTs...should be easy with a high mount manifold...Just point at each runner....

Infared temp gun? lol

Always been looking for an excuse to get a good one.

Yep thats the one. (hate getting in to work early)..I was talking to a guy a while ago who had a sprint car and thats what he uses...He just had a case where an engine he had built had a cracked piston ring from assembly...It wasn't making expected power and there was a slight miss...they did a static comp test and all cylinders were within specs...They ended up getting hold of an infra red temp gun and 1 cyl was down in temp...they pulled the engine down and found they had a broken piston ring in the colder cylinder...

If you get one I would get a good one...I also wouldn't expect it to work as well on the stock manifold because it is cast iron (higher thermal conductivity) and thick walled so the temperature gradients due to different EGTs would be lower..Although if you had another rb25 with similar exhaust setup you could comapre the two...

I am gonna try and explain in lamans terms why the Greddy and other plenums are shaped the way they are and a better option...

Btw way i would not use any other plenum for a foward facing TB!! I know I am going to get quoted back to me that person x, y and z use a modified rb25 manifold and make x, y and z rwkW so they do work, BUT consider this

Just because an engine doesn't suffer detonation or hasn't blown up yet doesn't mean it is running perfectly...It just may be that the tuning is overly rich and the leanest cylinder is still rich enough to keep EGTs respectable...It also may just be that the variation of between cylinders is just under the precipice of being acceptible and the engine 'is' holding together ...only just!!

Dont forget that the standard way of tuning is by using one O2 sensor that gives an averaged reading and for turbo cars target AFRs used by tuners are always conservative when compared to NA tuning...

The aim of any engine design is to have as much eveness between cylinder as possible...It is a known fact that multi cylinder engines that have even perfomance in each cylinder will make more power than those that don't...all else being equal...

This why we go to the trouble of cc ing combustion chambers etc etc to ensure the comp ratio is even...Now I doubt any engine deign would be perfect as real life is never perfect...But factory setups would be designed, prototyped and bench tested to ensure variations are within fairly tight limits...

So unless you do everything you can attain eveness throughout the cylinders, even if the engine is holding together and making decent power, you are still leaving horsepower on the table..

As far as the Greddy plenum shape is concerned....

Consider that:

Airflow into manifold = airflow out of manifold..

Gas flowing through any enclosure expereinces friction so you get pressure drop between inlet and outlets..AND pressure drop is proportional to cross section area and volumetric flow..

Volumetric airflow is proportional to flow velocity x flow cross sectional area.. at constant pressure...so for the same pressure if you reduce the cross sectional area by 50% flow velocity will roughly double...

Now if air enters the plenum at 6 volumetric units per second it needs to be divided up 6 ways...To do this you need the pressure at each outlet to be even...If you had a parallel plenum 6 units of air would enter, some would exit to cyl number 1 and the rest would continure to along the plenum...The air continuing throught the plenum would be 6 units minus air that exited through cyl number 1... Due to friction in plenum you would have pressure drop...due to reduced volumetric flow (some air has gone to cyl number 1) you would also have lower flow velocity (dont forget plenum is parallel at this stage) which also changes friction which changes pressure drop as well...BUT

If after cylinder number 1 you reduced the cross section of the plenum to so that the air velocity is increased again, the pressure would be reinstated..This repeats for each cylinder until number 6 is reached...

I think this is nearly correct....please feel free to pull it too pieces..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...