Jump to content
SAU Community

Running Ex Bosch 044 W/o A Surge Tank?

Shockster0429

By Shockster0429,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Shockster0429 Enthusiast

Shockster0429

Posted
Posted

Well I'm going to be need more fuel for my new setup this year. However I really don't want to run a surge tank it seems like a hassle and not entirely needed at least from what I think.... could be wrong. I've been searching for a few hours now and am having trouble finding someone whose running their fuel pump(s) like this.

Using my currently intank walbro 255 as the lift pump, but not using a surge, and off that same feed line, running the 044 bosch then to the fuel filter, the fuel rail, into the FPR and back into the tank for return. Any issues with this setup type of setup? heres a shitty drawing I did in paint for it.

thanks.

305534299.jpg

GeeTR Grand Master

GeeTR

Posted
Posted (edited)

That setup should be fine.

You haven't mentioned what fuel tank your putting it in. Most Skylines seem to get away without a surge tank, if they're 1/3 full.

044 is rated at 600hp, which is about 350rwkw.

In reality, a tank and some line wont cost that much extra if you fit it under the car. Once you go in the boot, you'll have to use hardline or teflon braid to limit fuel weepage and cabin smell.

Edited by GeeTR
Shockster0429 Enthusiast

Shockster0429

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Its actually in an s-13 chassis, using the stock fuel tank. The rear of the car is gutted, and car has a 6 point cage it in. The car is daily driven so I do place items in the hatch (one reason I don't want a surge tank).

I'm under some time constraints currently to getting the car finished and moved out so a surge tank can always be an option for under the car at a later point.

I'm aware of the 044's output however are you saying that because the power outputs don't add to each other? I understand that there will be loses with this setup so it will never see the full potential of both pumps, but it should be able to make over 600hp since the walbro is aiding it as well?

GeeTR Grand Master

GeeTR

Posted
Posted

S13 chassis - nice, I almost bought a 180 with a RB20 in it 3y ago.

No sorry - I was just rambling off the output, as you hadn't mentioned a turbo, or power goal :)

Correct, having the ass of the 044 fed a positive pressure will undoubtedly help it reach its "on paper" spec.

180 or Silvia? As if 180, the boot isn't sealed from the cabin, so you cant legally fit a s.tank setup in there ne way. you'd have to enclose all the gear in a box, or just stick it under the car. My vote is for a carefully designed under floor setup. It means you can use ordinary EFI hose with worm clamps, and don't need to be fussed with fancy stuff to prevent smell.

Shockster0429 Enthusiast

Shockster0429

Posted
  • Author
Posted
S13 chassis - nice, I almost bought a 180 with a RB20 in it 3y ago.

No sorry - I was just rambling off the output, as you hadn't mentioned a turbo, or power goal :)

Correct, having the ass of the 044 fed a positive pressure will undoubtedly help it reach its "on paper" spec.

180 or Silvia? As if 180, the boot isn't sealed from the cabin, so you cant legally fit a s.tank setup in there ne way. you'd have to enclose all the gear in a box, or just stick it under the car. My vote is for a carefully designed under floor setup. It means you can use ordinary EFI hose with worm clamps, and don't need to be fussed with fancy stuff to prevent smell.

Lol, well I'm from the states, and around here theres no emissions testing or anything, so no worries. Its a s-13 hatch with chuki front end. I think for the moment since its cool to run the pump like that, I'll just use my stock lines and nipple adapters.

Setup is 2.7 liter stroker with forgies of course, 8.5 to 1, 35r T4 hot sided tons of other goodies too much to list. Looking to make close to 500rwhp with pump gas here. I shall see. This setup should be plenty for that.

Shockster0429 Enthusiast

Shockster0429

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The walbro wont be "aiding" the bosch at all, the bosch flows a truckload more so its pointless having the walbro there at all IMO.

good point, I know in fluid systems like for water plants and such, running pumps in parallel doesn't allow them to flow their max do to line sizing and so forth.. I shall see, basically the walbro will just be hanging out then if that ends up being the case. I'll know more when I'm making pulls and watching my fuel pressure.

BHDave Grand Master

BHDave

Posted
Posted

I tried the exact same thing. The 044 was cavitating with that setup, it just couldn't get enough fuel in.

If you want to run an external pump then add a surge tank with a decent size feed into the back of the 044, otherwise get an 040 and replace the in tank walbro and run one pump.

GeeTR Grand Master

GeeTR

Posted
Posted (edited)
...the bosch flows a truckload more...

The Bosch does indeed, but the Walbro's issue is suppling flow at high pressures, which isn't occurring here as its not pushing onto a FPR and making 60psi, its pushing into the back of the intake of another pump; Its pushing into negative pressure area. hence Id think It'd be fine.

Don't get me wrong, im not a fan of the setup either, but I know ppl that do run it like that, and its fine. The things you can get away with are amazing.

Dave, were the two pumps close to together?

PS: Nice sounding setup Cory, but wtf's a Chucki?

Edited by GeeTR
BHDave Grand Master

BHDave

Posted
Posted

the 044 was in the back corner of the boot walbro in the stock location in the tank, so maybe 800mm between them by the time the hose wound it's way into the boot.

to be honest i think the 044 just didn't like a 5/16 feed line as i had the same problem when i initially installed the surge tank and maintained the same 5/16 fitting on the inlet of the 044. I upsized to 3/8 (i think) or maybe 1/2inch, can't remember, and the problem went away.

Risking Grand Master

Risking

Posted
Posted

Its not feeding a negative pressure area at all. Thats why you need a lift pump to feed it. The old VL turbo pumps needed a lift pump due to this same reason.

If it did produce a neg area behind the feed there would be no need for a surge tank or a lift pump as the 044 would generate its own fuel supply.

Dave is correct the 044 will always cavitate when being feed by something like a walbro with a 5/16ths line. A 3/8ths feed should be fine for that pump. You really need to do it properly and run a surge tank gravity feeding into the 044. Or use an intank 040 and all your problems are covered with an intank solution.

GeeTR Grand Master

GeeTR

Posted
Posted
Its not feeding a negative pressure area at all. Thats why you need a lift pump to feed it. The old VL turbo pumps needed a lift pump due to this same reason.

If it did produce a neg area behind the feed there would be no need for a surge tank or a lift pump as the 044 would generate its own fuel supply.

Dave is correct the 044 will always cavitate when being feed by something like a Walbro with a 5/16ths line. A 3/8ths feed should be fine for that pump. You really need to do it properly and run a surge tank gravity feeding into the 044. Or use an intank 040 and all your problems are covered with an intank solution.

Confusions :( My point was that a Walbro, pushing against no restriction (or think of it, as having its output sucked from it by the 044) should keep up with a 044.

An 044 (roughly 040 sized i thought) into a S13 tank while not technically hard, isnt a simple affair I'v found; which is why people supplement the setup with a external 044, simply using the smaller Walbro to force feed it (and give it that head of pressure your talking about)

Shockster0429 Enthusiast

Shockster0429

Posted
  • Author
Posted

My 044 will be mounted in my engine bay, so there will basically be the length of the car's distance between the two. I think your pumps might have been too close together? OR maybe it was too small of a line. In theory you would think the fuel would be sucked through the walbro more with the 044 since they are hooked to the same line it would be aiding.. Maybe I'll call bosch tomorrow or a company that sells these pumps and uses them to see what they think.

GeeTR this is a chuki front end and my car...

265409365.jpg

Wheezy Mentor

Wheezy

Posted
Posted (edited)
The Japanese I do believe, and its KA24 :(.

We call them a Onevia in Aus. The opposite of Sileighty. :D

Thus your Chuki is a 180sx in Japan, with a 2.4L making 240, sucks to be a yank I guess :D

Edited by Wheezy
BHDave Grand Master

BHDave

Posted
Posted

chuki is an sr 180 front end, zenki is the ca 180 front end, as far as Aussies and Japanese are concerned.

type x front ends have a different name again, but i can't remember it as i've only seen it mentioned once.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • MBS206
      Duncan's V37.......race car?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • Duncan
      Duncan's V37.......race car?

      By Duncan · Posted

      To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • Duncan
      Duncan's V37.......race car?

      By Duncan · Posted

      So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • RP1421
      S15 Spec R

      By RP1421 · Posted

      As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • joshuaho96
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...